Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T06:41:50.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergence pattern of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) influenced by tillage timings and residual herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2020

Parminder S. Chahal Open the ORCID record for Parminder S. Chahal [Opens in a new window] ,
Ethann R. Barnes  and
Amit J. Jhala Open the ORCID record for Amit J. Jhala [Opens in a new window]
Parminder S. Chahal
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Scientist, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Ethann R. Barnes
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Amit J. Jhala*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Amit J. Jhala, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, 279 Plant Science Hall, P.O. Box 830915, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE68583 Email: Amit.Jhala@unl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evolution of multiple herbicide-resistant weeds, including Palmer amaranth, has necessitated the implementation of an integrated weed management (IWM) program. Understanding weed emergence patterns is critical for developing effective IWM strategies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of tillage timings and residual herbicides on cumulative emergence and emergence pattern of Palmer amaranth. Field experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016 in a field naturally infested with photosystem (PS) II and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth near Shickley, Nebraska, in a bare ground study, with no crop planted in the plots, although residues from the preceding corn crop were present on the soil surface. Treatments consisted of shallow tillage timings (early, mid, and late), three premix corn or soybean residual herbicides, and a nontreated control. The Weibull function was fitted to cumulative Palmer amaranth emergence with day of year (DOY) and thermal time (TT) as independent variables. Year by treatment interaction was significant for time to 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90% Palmer amaranth emergence and cumulative emergence. The majority of Palmer amaranth seedlings emerged early, following early tillage with 90% cumulative emergence occurring on DOY 172 compared with DOY 210 to 212 for mid- and late-tillage, and DOY 194 for the nontreated control in 2015. In 2016, 90% of cumulative emergence following early-, mid-, and late-tillage (DOYs 201 to 211) were similar, and that of the nontreated control (DOY 188) was similar to that of early tillage. Nontreated control and PRE herbicide treatments had similar DOY values for 90% emergence in both years. The number of emerged Palmer amaranth seedlings over the season was higher with shallow tillage than no tillage or with the use of PRE herbicides.

Keywords

Cumulative emergenceday of yearintegrated weed managementoccasional tillagethermal time modelWeibull functionAtrazinebicyclopyronechlorimuronflumioxazinfluthiacetmesotrionepyroxasulfoneS-metolachlorPalmer amaranthAmaranthus palmeri S. Watson
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 433 - 439
Check for updates
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Mark VanGessel, University of Delaware

References

Anderson, DR (2008) Model based inference in the life sciences: primer on evidence. New York: Springer. 184 p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aulakh, JS, Price, AJ, Enloe, SF, Wehtje, G, Patterson, MG (2013) Integrated Palmer amaranth management in glufosinate-resistant cotton: II. primary, secondary and conservation tillage. Agron 3:28–42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, ER, Werle, R, Sandell, LD, Lindquist, JL, Knezevic, SZ, Sikkema, PH, Jhala, AJ (2017) Influence of tillage on common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) emergence pattern in Nebraska. Weed Technol 31:623–631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, VP, Reardon, CL, Coffey, T, Klein, AM, McFarland, C, Huggins, DR, Sullivan, TS (2018) Stratification of soil chemical and microbial properties under no-till after liming. Appl Soil Ecol 130:169–177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ (2011) Herbicide-resistant weed management: focus on glyphosate. Pest Manag Sci 67:1037–1048 Google ScholarPubMed
Blanco-Canqui, H, Lal, R (2008) No-Tillage and carbon sequestration: an on-farm assessment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:693–701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Canqui, H, Wortmann, CS (2020) Does occasional tillage undo the ecosystem services gained with no-till? A review. Soil Till Res 198: Article 104534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, IC, Schroeder, M, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2007) Palmer amaranth interference and seed production in peanut. Weed Technol 21:367–371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahal, PS, Irmak, S, Jugulam, M, Jhala, AJ (2018a) Evaluating effect of degree of water stress on growth and fecundity of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) using soil moisture sensors. Weed Sci 66:738–745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahal, PS, Ganie, ZA, Jhala, AJ (2018b) Overlapping residual herbicides for control of photosystem II and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) in glyphosate-resistant maize. Front Plant Sci 8:2231, 10.3389/fpls.2017.02231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahal, PS, Jhala, AJ (2018) Economics of management of photosystem II- and HPPD-inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth in corn. Agron J 110:1905–1914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahal, PS, Jhala, AJ (2019) Integrated management of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) with tillage and herbicides in soybean. Weed Technol 33:859–866 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Singh, RG, Mahajan, G (2012) Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: a review. Crop Prot 38:57–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristaudo, A, Gresta, F, Luciani, F, Restuccia, A (2007) Effects of after harvest period and environmental factors on seed dormancy of Amaranthus species. Weed Res 47:327–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, York, AC (2010) Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer amaranth in the US. Pages 195–212 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate resistance: evolution, mechanisms, and management. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470634394.ch11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, WS (2016) Persistence of herbicides in soil. Crops Soil 49:16–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, SO (2017) The history and current status of glyphosate. Pest Manag Sci 74:1027–1034 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehleringer, J (1983) Ecophysiology of Amaranthus palmeri, a Sonoran desert summer annual. Oecologia 57:107–112 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franca, LX (2015) Emergence patterns of common waterhemp and Palmer amaranth in southern Illinois. M.S. thesis. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University. 44 pGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, RS, Cardina, J (1998) Phytochrome-Mediated Amaranthus germination, I: effect of seed burial and germination temperature. Weed Sci 46:48–52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianessi, LP (2005) Economic and herbicide use impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 61:241–245 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilley, JE, Doran, JW (1997) Tillage effects on soil erosion potential and soil quality of a former conservation reserve program site. J Soil Water Cons 52:184–188 Google Scholar
Givens, WA, Shaw, DR, Kruger, GR, Johnson, WG, Weller, SC, Young, BG, Wilson, RG, Owen, MD, Jordan, D (2009) Survey of tillage trends following the adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 23:150–155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, AC (2003) Predicting weed emergence: a review of approaches and future challenges. Weed Res 43:1–11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummerson, RJ (1986) The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potential on the germination of sugar beet. J Exp Bot 41:1431–1439 Google Scholar
Guo, PG, Al-Khatib, K (2003) Temperature effects on germination and growth of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis). Weed Sci 51:869–875 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2020) Herbicide resistant Palmer amaranth globally. http://www.weedscience.org/Summary/Species.aspx. Accessed: November 2, 2020Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 48:347–355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK (2009) Soybean canopy and tillage effects on emergence of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) from a natural seed bank. Weed Sci 57:644–651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK, Riley, MB, Bridges, W Jr (2010) Annual changes in temperature and light requirements for germination of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seeds retrieved from soil. Weed Sci 58:426–432 Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Norsworthy, JK, Ganie, ZA, Sosnoskie, LM, Beckie, HJ, Mallory-Smith, CA, Liu, J, Wei, W, Wang, J, Stoltenberg, DE (2020) Pollen-Mediated gene flow and transfer of resistance alleles from herbicide-resistant broadleaf weeds. Weed Technol https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Rana, N, Kruger, GR, Knezevic, SZ (2014 ) Confirmation and control of triazine and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-inhibiting herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 28:28–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Malik, MS, Willis, JB (2015). Weed control and crop tolerance of micro-encapsulated acetochlor applied sequentially in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Can J Plant Sci 95:973–981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WG, Bradley, PR, Hart, SE, Buesinger, ML, Massey, RE (2000) Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 14:57–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, S, Werle, R, Sandell, L, Jhala, AJ (2016) Spring-Tillage has no effect on the emergence pattern of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in Nebraska. Can J Plant Sci 96:726–729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingaman, TE, Oliver, LR (1994) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 42:523–527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Pavlovic, P, Osipitan, OA, Barnes, ER, Beiermann, C, Oliveira, MC, Lawrence, N, Scott, JE, Jhala, A (2019) Critical time for weed removal in glyphosate-resistant soybean as influenced by preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 33:393–399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, RG, Knapp, AD, Owen, MDK (2004) Effect of temperature on the germination of common waterhemp (Amaranthis tuberculatus), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 52:67–73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, RG, Owen, MDK (2003) Regulation of weed seed dormancy through light and temperature interactions. Weed Sci 51:752–758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liphadzi, KB, Dille, JA (2006) Annual weed competitiveness as affected by preemergence herbicide in corn. Weed Sci 54:156–165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, RS, Horak, MJ, Boyer J Jr (2001) Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci 49:202–208 Google Scholar
Mayer, DG, Butler, DG (1993) Statistical validation. Ecol Model 68:21–32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60 (SI I):31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogle, RE, Warren, GF (1954) Fate and activity of herbicides in soils. Weeds 3:257–273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powles, SB (2008) Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manag Sci 64:360–365 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raper, RL, Reeves, DW, Burmester, CH, Schwab, EB (2000) Tillage depth, tillage timing, and cover crop effects on cotton yield, soil strength, and tillage energy requirements. Appl Eng Agric 16:379–385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, KN, Whiting, K (2000) Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-tolerant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems. Weed Technol 14:204–211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman, ES, Murphy, SD, Swanton, CJ (2000) Simulation of Chenopodium album seedling emergence. Weed Sci 48:217–224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Jhala, AJ (2018a) A Statewide survey of stakeholders to assess the problem weeds and weed management practices in Nebraska. Weed Technol 32:642–655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Jhala, AJ (2018b) Comparison of a premix of atrazine, bicyclopyrone, mesotrione, and S-metolachlor with other preemergence herbicides for weed control and corn yield in no-tillage and reduced-tillage production systems in Nebraska, USA. Soil Till Res 178:82–91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, JD (1957) Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious Amaranthus . Evolution 11:11–31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, MacRae, AW, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2012) Pollen-Mediated dispersal of glyphosate-resistance in Palmer amaranth under field conditions. Weed Sci 60:366–373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmaus, SJ, Prather, TS, Holt, JS (2000) Estimation of base temperatures for nine weed species. J Exp Bot 51:275–286 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker A (1976) Simulation of herbicide persistence in soil.I. simazine and prometryne. Pest Manag Sci 7:41–49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Coble, HD (1995) Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol 11:308–317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, R, Bernards, ML, Arkebauer, TJ, Lindquist, JL (2014a) Environmental triggers of winter annual weed emergence in the Midwestern United States. Weed Sci 62:83–96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, R, Sandell, LD, Buhler, DD, Hartzler, RG, Lindquist, JL (2014b) Predicting emergence of 23 summer annual weed species. Weed Sci 62:267–279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, MS, McClure, MA, Hayes, RM, Steckel, LE (2015). Integrating cover crops and POST herbicides for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in corn. Weed Technol 29:412–418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America (2016) WSSA survey ranks Palmer amaranth as the most troublesome weed in the U.S., Galium as the most troublesome in Canada. http://wssa.net/2016/04/wssa-survey-ranks-palmer-amaranth-as-the-most-troublesome-weed-in-the-u-s-galium-as-the-most-troublesome-in-canada/. Accessed: January 28, 2019Google Scholar
Young, BG (2006) Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 20:301–307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar