Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T15:41:11.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Weed Control and Irrigation on Pecan (Carya illinoinensis) Growth and Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael G. Patterson  and
William D. Goff
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
William D. Goff
Affiliation:
Hortic. Dep. and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pecan trees subjected to different weed control and irrigation regimes from planting in 1986 through 1993 produced similar yields when irrigated (400 kg/ha, 3-yr avg) and not irrigated (320 kg/ha, 3-yr avg). Trees receiving total chemical weed control produced over five times more pecans (735 kg/ha, 3-yr avg) than weedy trees (131 kg/ha, 3-yr avg). Trees receiving disking produced more pecans when irrigated (677 kg/ha, 3-yr avg) than when not irrigated (339 kg/ha, 3-yr avg). Growth rate, expressed as increase in tree stem diameter, decreased for trees in all treatments once trees began bearing.

Keywords

Pecan, Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) Koch ‘Desirable.’Drip irrigationherbicidestillagemowing
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 717 - 719
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alabama Pesticide Handbook. 1993. Pecan weed control, peach weed control. Alabama Coop. Ext. Ser., Auburn, AL. 388 p.Google Scholar
2. Brown, S. M., Whitwell, T., and Street, J. E. 1985. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) competition in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 33:503–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Curtis, L. M., Goff, W. D., and Tyson, T. W. 1986. Drip irrigation for pecans in Alabama. Alabama Coop. Ext. Serv. Cir. ANR-448, 11 p. Auburn University, AL.Google Scholar
4. Goff, W. D., Patterson, M. G., and West, M. S. 1991. Orchard floor management practices influence elemental concentrations in young pecan trees. HortScience 26:1379–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Patterson, M. G., Wehtje, G., and Goff, W. D. 1990. Effects of weed control and irrigation on the growth of young pecans. Weed Technol. 4:892–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Stein, L. A., McEachern, G. R., and Storey, J. B. 1989. Summer and fall moisture stress and irrigation scheduling influence pecan growth and production. HortScience 24:607–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Vencil, W. K., Giraudo, L. J., and Langdale, G. W. 1993. Soil moisture relations and critical period of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. (coastal bermudagrass) competition in conservation tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Weed Res. 33:89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Weller, S. C., Skroch, W. A., and Monaco, T. J. 1985. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) interference in newly planted peach (Prunus persica) trees. Weed Sci. 33:50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar