Skip to main content Accessibility help

Effect of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on the Interference between Bluebunch Wheatgrass (Agropyron spicatum) and Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea maculosa)

  • James S. Jacobs (a1), Roger L. Sheley (a1) and Bruce D. Maxwell (a1)


Effectiveness of the common soil fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as a biological control for spotted knapweed and its effect on competitive interactions between spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass were evaluated in a growth chamber study using addition series methods. Total seeding densities ranged from 2000 to 60 000 seeds/m2. Mean bluebunch wheatgrass plant weight was 3.5 times greater than spotted knapweed weight per plant, respectively. Coefficient ratios estimating species interaction showed bluebunch wheatgrass density had a greater influence than spotted knapweed density on both bluebunch wheatgrass and spotted knapweed weights (2.11 and 0.51, respectively) when not under the influence of S. sclerotiorum. Niche differentiation ratios indicated a lack of resource partitioning between species (1.11). S. sclerotiorum reduced spotted knapweed density by 68 to 80% without reducing bluebunch wheatgrass density. Spotted knapweed weight per plant also was reduced by the addition of 5. sclerotiorum (1.4 to 1.2 mg) but there was not a corresponding increase in bluebunch wheatgrass weight. S. sclerotiorum decreased competition between spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. This study provides evidence that establishment of bluebunch wheatgrass on spotted knapweed infested rangeland may be improved by combining S. sclerotiorum with high grass seeding rates.



Hide All
1. Aarssen, L. W. 1983. Ecological combining ability and competitive combining ability in plants: Toward a general evolutionary theory of coexistence in systems of competition. Am. Nat. 122:707731.
2. Chicoine, T. K., Fay, P. K., and Nielsen, G. A. 1985. Predicting weed migration from soil and climate maps. Weed Sci. 34:5761.
3. Davis, E. S., Fay, P. K., Chicoine, T. K., and Lacey, C. A. 1993. Persistence of spotted knapweed. Weed Sci. 41:5761.
4. Donald, C. M. 1951. Inter-specific competition among annual pasture plants. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2:355376.
5. Ford, E. J. 1989. Sclerotinia as a Mycoherbicide. p. 182190 in Fay, P. K. and Lacey, J. R., eds. Knapweed Symp. Proc. Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT.
6. Griffith, D. and Lacey, J. R. 1991. Economic evaluation of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) control using picloram. J. Range Manage. 44:4347.
7. Harris, G. A. 1967. Some competitive relationships between Agropyron spicatum and Bromus tectorum . Ecol. Monogr. 37:89111.
8. Lacey, J. R., Marlow, C. B., and Lane, J. R. 1989. Influence of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) on surface runoff and sediment yield. Weed Technol. 3:627631.
9. Maddox, D. M. 1982. Biological control of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and spotted knapweed (C. maculosa). Weed Sci. 30:7682.
10. Miller, V., Ford, E. J., Zidack, N. J., and Sands, D. S. 1989. A pyrimidine auxotroph of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum for use in biological weed control. J. Gen. Microbiol. 135:20852091.
11. Mortenson, K. and Molloy, M. M. 1989. Fungi detected on Acroptilon repens (Russian knapweed) during surveys from 1981 to 1988. Can. Plant Dis. Surv. 69:143145.
12. Muller-Scharer, H. and Schroeder, D. 1993. The biological control of Centaurea spp. in North America: do insects solve the problem? Pestic Sci. 37:343353.
13. Prather, T. S. and Callihan, R. H. 1991. Interference between yellow starthistle and pubescent wheatgrass. J. Range Manage. 44:443447.
14. Purdy, L. H. 1979. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum history, diseases, symptomatology, host, range, geographic distribution, and impact. Phytopathology 69:875880.
15. Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1:190198.
16. Ratkowski, D. A. 1983. Nonlinear Regression Modeling: A Unified Practical Approach. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY. 276 p.
17. Roché, B. F. Jr. and Talbott, C. J. 1986. The collection history of Centaureas found in Washington State. Agric. Res. Cent., Washington State Univ. Res. Bull. XB0978. 36 p.
18. Roush, M. L. 1988. Models of a four-species annual weed community: growth, competition, and community dynamics. , Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 218 p.
19. Sheley, R. L., and Larson, L. L. 1994. Comparative growth and interference between cheatgrass and yellow starthistle seedlings. J. Range Manage. 47:470474.
20. Sheley, R. L. and Larson, L. L. 1995. Emergence date effects on resource partitioning between diffuse knapweed seedlings. J. Range Manage. [in press].
21. Shirman, R. 1981. Seed production and spring seedling establishment of diffuse and spotted knapweed. J. Range Mange. 34:4547.
22. Spitters, T. J. 1983. An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. I. Examinations of competition effects. Netherlands. J. Agric. Sci. 31:111.
23. Story, J. M., Boggs, K. W., Good, W. R. and Nowierski, R. M. 1989. The seed moth, Metzneria paucipuntella: Its impact on spotted knapweed seed production and two seed head flies, Urophora spp. p. 172174 in Fay, P. K. and Lacey, J. R., eds. Proc. Knapweed Symp. Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT.
24. Strang, R. M., Lindsay, K. M., and Price, R. S. 1979. Knapweeds: British Columbia's undesirable aliens. Rangelands 1:141143.
25. Tyser, W. T., and Key, C. H. 1988. Spotted knapweed in natural area fescue grasslands: an ecological assessment. Northwest Sci. 68:151160.
26. Watson, A. K., and Renney, A. J. 1974. The biology of Canadian weeds. 6. Centaurea diffusa and C. maculosa . Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:687701.
27. Watson, A. K., Copeman, R. L., and Renney, A. J. 1974. A first record of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Microsphoaeropsis centaureae on Centaurea diffusa . Can. J. Bot. 52:26392640.
28. Weldon, C. W. and Slauson, W. L. 1986. The intensity of competition versus its importance: An overlooked distinction and some implications. Q. Rev. Biol. 61:2344.
29. Zimdall, R. L. 1980. Weed crop competition: A review. International Plant Protection Center, Corvallis, OR. 195 p.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed