Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effect of Glyphosate and MSMA Application Timing on Weed Control, Fruiting Patterns, and Yield in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton

  • Michael W. Edenfield (a1), Barry J. Brecke (a1), Daniel L. Colvin (a2), Joan A. Dusky (a3) and Donn G. Shilling (a1)...

Abstract

The limited window of opportunity for glyphosate postemergence (POST) over-the-top applications in glyphosate-resistant cotton poses a problem for growers where a midseason salvage weed control remedy is necessary. The objectives of these experiments were to compare glyphosate and MSMA for midseason weed control and their subsequent effect on cotton fruiting characteristics and yield. Glyphosate at 0.85 kg ai/ha was more effective than MSMA at 1.7 kg ai/ha for POST control of sicklepod, redweed, and pitted morningglory. Single glyphosate treatments applied at the 8-, 10-, or 12-leaf cotton stage resulted in less-effective weed control than when applied at the four-leaf cotton stage. Glyphosate applied at the four-leaf cotton stage followed by a sequential POST-directed application at 6-, 8-, 10-, or 12-leaf cotton stage increased season-long weed control and yield compared with a single application at the four-leaf stage. Both glyphosate and MSMA controlled Florida beggarweed, regardless of POST application timing. Generally, cotton was more tolerant to glyphosate than MSMA when applied over-the-top. Glyphosate applied POST over-the-top to weed-free 12-leaf cotton resulted in a 19 and 14% yield loss compared with the weed-free nontreated cotton in 1997 and 1999. MSMA reduced yield by 58 and 36% in 1997 and 1999, respectively. Glyphosate did not affect weed-free cotton fruit development or yield when applied over-the-top to four-leaf cotton or when a POST-directed application was followed at the 12-leaf stage.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: mike.edenfield@bayercropscience.com

Footnotes

Hide All
Current address: Bayer CropScience, 17745 South Metcalf, Building #1, Stilwell, KS 66085-9104.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Boone, M. Y. L., McKinion, J. M., and Willers, J. L. 1995. Baker's plant mapping technique—an alternative procedure for GOSSYM. in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton conference, January 4–7, 2000, San Antonio, TX. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. Pp. 443444.
Bourland, F. M. and Watson, C. E. Jr. 1990. COTMAP, a technique for evaluating structure and yield of cotton plants. Crop Sci. 30:224226.
Brown, S. M. 1996. Cotton weed control. in Delaplane, K., ed. Georgia Pest Control Handbook. Georgia Coop. Ext. Serv. Spec. Bull. 882. Memphis, TN: The Cotton Foundation. 30 p.
Buchanan, G. A. 1992. Trends in weed control methods. in McWhorter, C. G. and Abernathy, J. R., eds. Weeds of Cotton: Characterization and Control. Cotton Foundation Ref. Book Ser. 2. Memphis, TN: The Cotton Foundation. Pp. 4772.
Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149154.
Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Interaction of fluometuron and MSMA with sethoxydim and fluazifop. Weed Sci. 33:270276.
Constable, G. A. 1991. Mapping the production and survival of fruit on field-grown cotton. Agron. J. 83:374378.
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1998. Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 2:174185. Web page: http://www.jcotsci.org. Accessed: January 2000.
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed survey—southern states: broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:300313.
Guthrie, D. S. and York, A. C. 1989. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield following fluometuron postemergence applied. Weed Technol. 3:501504.
Johnson, W. C. III., Wauchope, R. D., and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 1997. Response of peanut to low rates of MSMA. Weed Sci. 45:430433.
Jones, M. A. and Snipes, C. E. 1999. Tolerance of transgenic cotton to topical applications of glyphosate. J. Cotton Sci. 3:1926. Web page: http://www.jcotsci.org. Accessed: January 2000.
Jordan, D., McClelland, M., Kendig, A., and Frans, R. 1997. Monosodium methanearsonate influence on broadleaf weed control with selected postemergence-directed cotton herbicides. J. Cotton Sci. 1:7275. Web page: http://www.jcotsci.org. Accessed: January 2000.
Kennedy, C. W., Smith, W. C. Jr., and Jones, J. E. 1986. Effect of early season square removal on three leaf types of cotton. Crop Sci. 26:139145.
Kletter, E. and Wallach, D. 1982. Effects of fruiting form removal on cotton reproductive development. Field Crops Res. 5:6984.
Pline, W. A., Wilcut, J. W., Duke, S. O., Edmisten, K. L., and Wells, R. 2002. Tolerance and accumulation of shikimic acid in response to glyphosate applications in glyphosate-resistant and nonglyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:506512.
Reddy, V. R., Baker, D. N., and Hodges, H. F. 1990. Temperature and mepiquat chloride effects on cotton canopy architecture. Agron. J. 82:190195.
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1987. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 6th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.
Snipes, C. E. and Byrd, J. D. Jr. 1994. The influence of fluometuron and MSMA on cotton yield and fruiting characteristics. Weed Sci. 42:210215.
Sprenkel, R. K. 1997. Cotton Production Guidelines. Agronomy Department Document SS-AGR-62. Gainesville, FL: IFAS, University of Florida. Pp. 18.
Wells, R. and Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1984. Comparative growth of obsolete and modern cultivars. III. Relationship of yield to observed growth characteristics. Crop Sci. 24:868872.
Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Vencill, W. K., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1997. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with soil-applied and post-directed herbicides. Weed Technol. 11:221226.

Keywords

Effect of Glyphosate and MSMA Application Timing on Weed Control, Fruiting Patterns, and Yield in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton

  • Michael W. Edenfield (a1), Barry J. Brecke (a1), Daniel L. Colvin (a2), Joan A. Dusky (a3) and Donn G. Shilling (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed