Skip to main content Accessibility help

Cultivation and Reduced-Rate Herbicides Weed Control in Sugarbeet Grown for Biofuel

  • W. Carroll Johnson (a1), Theodore M. Webster (a2), Timothy L. Grey (a3) and Xuelin Luo (a4)


Sugarbeet, grown for biofuel, is being considered as an alternate cool-season crop in the southeastern United States. Previous research identified ethofumesate PRE and phenmedipham + desmedipham POST as herbicides that controlled troublesome cool-season weeds in the region, specifically cutleaf evening-primrose. Research trials were conducted from 2014 through 2016 to evaluate an integrated system of sweep cultivation and reduced rates of ethofumesate PRE and/or phenmedipham+desmedipham POST for weed control in sugarbeet grown for biofuel. There were no interactions between the main effects of cultivation and herbicides for control of cutleaf evening-primrose and other cool-season species in two out of three years. Cultivation improved control of cool-season weeds, but the effect was largely independent of control provided by herbicides. Of the herbicide combinations evaluated, the best overall cool-season weed control was from systems that included either a 1/2X or 1X rate of phenmedipham+desmedipham POST. Either rate of ethofumesate PRE was less effective than phenmedipham+desmedipham POST. Despite improved cool-season weed control, sugarbeet yield was not affected by cultivation each year of the study. Sugarbeet yields were greater when treated with any herbicide combination that included either a 1/2X or 1X rate of phenmedipham+desmedipham POST compared with either rate of ethofumesate PRE alone or the nontreated control. These results indicate that cultivation has a very limited role in sugarbeet grown for biofuel. The premise of effective weed control based on an integration of cultivation and reduced herbicide rates does not appear to be viable for sugarbeet grown for biofuel.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: W. Carroll Johnson III, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793-0748. (Email:


Hide All
Anonymous (2017a) Betamix® herbicide specimen label. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. Accessed: November 3, 2017
Anonymous (2017b) North Dakota Herbicide Compendium. Accessed: October 24, 2017
Anonymous (2017c) Nortron SC® herbicide specimen label. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. Accessed: November 3, 2017
Armstrong, JQ, Sprague, CL (2010) Weed management in wide- and narrow-row glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet. Weed Sci 24:523528
Bollman, SL, Sprague, CL (2009) Effect of tillage and soil-applied herbicides with micro-rate herbicide programs on weed control and sugarbeet growth. Weed Technol 23:264269
Carlson, AL, Luecke, JL, Khan, MFR, Dexter, AG (2007) Survey of Weed Control and Production Practices on Sugarbeet in Minnesota and Eastern North Dakota. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University and University of Minnesota. Accessed: November 28, 2017
Dale, TM, Renner, KA, Kravchenko, AN (2006) Effect of herbicides on weed control and sugarbeet yield (Beta vulgaris) yield and quality. Weed Technol 20:150156.
Dexter, AG, Luecke, JL, Smith, LJ (1999) Influence of Cultivation on Yield of Roundup Ready and Liberty Link Sugarbeet. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University Sugarbeet Research and Extension Reports. Accessed: November 3, 2017
Finkenstadt, VL (2014) A review on the complete utilization of the sugarbeet. Sugar Tech 16:339346
Hembree, KJ (2016) UC IPM Guidelines: Sugarbeet. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3469. Accessed: November 3, 2017
Johnson, WC III, Webster, TM, Grey, TL, Luo, X (2018) Managing cool-season weeds in sugarbeet grown for biofuel in the southeastern U.S. Weed Technol 32:385391
Kaffka, S, Tharp, R (2013) Sugarbeet Production in the Imperial Valley. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. Accessed: December 13, 2017
Kemp, NJ, Taylor, EC, Renner, KA (2009) Weed management in glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant sugarbeet. Weed Technol 23:416424
Khan, MFR (2015) Update on adoption of glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet in the United States. Outlooks on Pest Management 26:6165
Kniss, AR, Wilson, RG, Martin, AR, Burgener, PA, Feuz, DM (2004) Economic evaluation of glyphosate-resistant and conventional sugar beet. Weed Technol 18:388396
Kroetz, ME, Schmidt, WH, Russell, FB, Brimhall, P (1973) Survey of sugar beet production practices in Ohio and their effect on sugar beet quality and yield. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 17:254259
McMinimy, MA (2016) U.S. Sugar Fundamentals. Congressional Research Service, R43998. Accessed: August 18, 2017
Melander, B, Rasmussen, IA, Barberi, P (2005) Integrating physical and cultural methods of weed control—examples from European research. Weed Sci 53:369381
Morishita, DW (2018) Impact of glyphosate-resistant sugar beet. Pest Manag Sci 74:10501053
Owen, MDK (2016) Diverse approaches to herbicide-resistant weed management. Weed Sci 64(suppl):570584
Panella, L (2010) Sugar beet as an energy crop. Sugar Tech 12:288293
Shaner, DL (2014) Lessons learned from the history of herbicide resistance. Weed Sci 62:427431
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2014) Table 37. Specified crops by acres harvested. In 2012 Census of Agriculture—State Data: Georgia.,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Georgia/st13_1_037_037.pdf . Accessed: December 21, 2017
Webster, TM, Grey, TL, Scully, BT, Johnson, WC III, Davis, RF, Brenneman, TB (2016) Yield potential of spring-harvested sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) depends on autumn planting date. Ind Crop Prod 83:5560
Wiltshire, JJJ, Tillett, ND, Hague, T (2003) Agronomic evaluation of precise mechanical hoeing and chemical weed control in sugar beet. Weed Res 43:236244
Wilson, RG, Sbatella, GM (2011) Late-season weed control in glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet. Weed Technol 25:350355
Winter, SR, Weise, AF (1978) Phytotoxicity and yield response of sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris) to a mixture of phenmedipham and desmedipham. Weed Sci 26:14
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed