Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T01:01:42.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Addition of Dicamba to POST Applications of Quizalofop-p-ethyl or Clethodim Antagonizes Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Corn Control in Dicamba-Resistant Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Matthew G. Underwood ,
Nader Soltani ,
David C. Hooker ,
Darren E. Robinson ,
Joseph P. Vink ,
Clarence J. Swanton  and
Peter H. Sikkema
Matthew G. Underwood
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, Canada N0P 2C0
Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, Canada N0P 2C0
David C. Hooker
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, Canada N0P 2C0
Darren E. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, Canada N0P 2C0
Joseph P. Vink
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, Canada N0P 2C0
Clarence J. Swanton
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, Canada N0P 2C0
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, Canada N0P 2C0
*
∗Corresponding author's E-mail: soltanin@uoguelph.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two studies consisting of six field experiments each were conducted at three locations in southwestern Ontario, Canada, in 2014 and 2015 to evaluate the possible antagonism when dicamba was added to quizalofop-p-ethyl or clethodim for the control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant (GR) corn. At 4 wk after application (WAA), quizalofop-p-ethyl at 24, 30, or 36 g ai ha−1 provided 88, 94, and 95% control of volunteer GR corn, respectively. The addition of dicamba at 300 or 600 g ae ha−1 to quizalofop-p-ethyl (24 g ha−1) reduced the activity of quizalofop-p-ethyl on volunteer GR corn by 12 and 20%. At 4 WAA, clethodim at 30, 37.5, and 45 g ai ha−1 provided 85, 91, and 95% control of volunteer GR corn, respectively. The addition of dicamba at 300 or 600 g ha−1 to clethodim (30 g ha−1) resulted in antagonism, causing a reduction in volunteer GR corn by 12 and 11%, respectively. In general, there was greater antagonism when the high rate of dicamba was tank-mixed with the lower rate of the graminicide. There was no antagonistic effect on soybean yield by tank-mixing dicamba with either graminicide at all rates evaluated. Based on these results, volunteer GR corn can be controlled effectively by increasing the rate of the graminicide when tankmixed with dicamba.

Dos estudios que consistieron de seis experimentos de campo cada uno fueron realizados en tres localidades en el suroeste de Ontario, Canada, en 2014 y 2015, para evaluar el posible antagonismo cuando se agrega dicamba a quizalofop-p-ethyl o clethodim para el control de maíz resistente a glyphosate (GR) voluntario. A 4 semanas después de la aplicación (WAA), quizalofop-p-ethyl a 24, 30, ó 36 g ai ha−1 brindó 88, 94, y 95% de control de maíz GR voluntario, respectivamente. La adición de 300 ó 600 g ae ha−1 dicamba a quizalofop-p-ethyl (24 g ha−1) redujo la actividad de quizalofop-p-ethyl en maíz GR voluntario en 12 y 20%. A 4 WAA, clethodim a 30, 37.5, y 45 g ai ha−1 brindó 85, 91, y 95% de control de maíz GR voluntario, respectivamente. La adición de 300 ó 600 g ha−1 dicamba a clethodim (30 g ha−1) resultó en antagonismo, el cual causó una reducción en el control de maíz GR voluntario de 12 y 11%. En general, hubo un mayor antagonismo cuando se mezcló en tanque la dosis alta de dicamba con la dosis baja del graminicida. No hubo ningún efecto antagónico sobre el rendimiento de la soja al mezclar en tanque dicamba con cualquiera de los dos graminicidas a las dosis evaluadas. Con base en estos resultados, el maíz GR voluntario puede ser controlado efectivamente al incrementar la dosis del graminicida en la mezcla en tanque.

Keywords

Clethodimdicambaquizalofop-p-ethylvolunteer corn, Zea mays L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrAntagonisticdensityglyphosate resistancegraminicideinjurytankmixweed controlweed emergenceyield
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 639 - 647
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Lawrence Steckel, University of Tennessee.

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, RN, Ford, JH, Lueshen, WE (1982) Controlling volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans (Glycine max) with diclofop and glyphosate. Weed Sci 30: 132–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, JW, Oliver, LR (2004) Chloransulam antagonizes annual grass control with aryloxyphenoxypropionate graminicides but not cyclohexanediones. Weed Technol 18: 763–772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnwell, P, Cobb, AH (1994) Graminicide antagonism by broadleaf weed herbicides. Pestic Sci 41: 77–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Harker, KN, Clayton, GE, O'Donovan, JT (2006) Broadleaf herbicide effects on clethodim and quizalofop-p efficacy on volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 20: 221–226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, JD, Gronwald, JW, Somers, DA, Connelly, JA, Gengenbach, BG, Wyse, DL (1987) Inhibition of plant acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase by the herbicides sethoxydim and haloxyfop. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 148: 1039–1044 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaunhal, PS, Krueger, G, Blanco, H, Jhala, AJ (2014) Efficacy of pre-emergence and post-emergence soybean herbicides for control of glufosinate-, glyphosate-, and imidazolinone-resistant volunteer corn. J Agric Sci 6: 131–140 Google Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses for herbicide combinations. Weeds 15: 20–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Your, AC, Jordan, DL, Corbin, FT, Sheldon, YS (1999) Basis for antagonism mixtures of bromoxynil plus quizalofop-p applied to yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca). Weed Technol 13: 515–519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deen, W, Hamill, A, Shropshire, C, Soltani, N, Sikkema, PH (2006) Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays) in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 20: 261–266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, JM (1989) Herbicide antagonism at the whole plant level. Weed Technol 3: 217–226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukorelli, G, Reisinger, P, Pinke, G (2013) ACCase inhibitor herbicides—selectivity, weed resistance and fitness cost: a review. Int J Pest Manage 59: 165–173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulasekera, K (2015) Estimated Area, Yield, Production and Farm Value of Specified Field Crops, Ontario, 2011–2015 (Imperial and Metric Units). http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/crops/estimate_new.htm. Accessed December 11, 2015Google Scholar
Mueller, TC, Barrett, M, Witt, WW (1990) A basis for the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on haloxyfop-methyl toxicity to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci 38: 103–107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[OMAFRA] Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (2013) Guide to Weed Control. Toronto, ON: OMAFRA Publ. 75. 191 pGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, GN, Coble, HD (1984) Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci 32: 436–441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2006) Control of volunteer glyphosate-tolerant maize (Zea mays) in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Crop Prot 25: 178–181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2015) Control of volunteer corn with the AAD-1 (aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-1) transgene in soybean. Weed Technol 29: 374–379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollmann, J, Wagentristl, H, Hartl, W (2010) The effects of simulated weed pressure on early maturity soybeans. Eur J Agron 32: 243–248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R, Sandell, LD, Klein, R, Bernards, M (2010) Volunteer corn control. Pages 201–215 in Proceedings of 2010 Crop Production Clinics. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension Google Scholar