Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-sbc4w Total loading time: 2.497 Render date: 2021-02-26T22:56:40.674Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Control of Imazethapyr-Resistant Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Soybean (Glycine max) and Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Dallas E. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
David L. Regehr
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1997 and 1998 near Rossville in northeast Kansas to evaluate control of imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower with selected herbicides in corn and soybean. In soybean, common sunflower control was unacceptable with imazethapyr, chlorimuron, CGA-277476, and cloransulam applied alone. Lactofen or acifluorfen applied with these herbicides slightly improved control, whereas glyphosate applied with them controlled more than 97% of common sunflower. All herbicides reduced common sunflower populations in the corn. The greatest reductions occurred when atrazine was applied with dicamba, 2,4-D, RPA 201772, or CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron. These herbicide combinations also stunted common sunflower that survived treatment. Several herbicide alternatives are available to control imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower in corn. However, glyphosate was the only herbicide that gave adequate control in soybean.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

1 Contribution 99-487-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station

References

Al-Khatib, K., Baumgartner, J. R., Peterson, D. E., and Currie, R. S. 1998. Imazethapyr resistance in common sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Sci. 46: 403407.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. N., Behrens, R., Warnes, D. D., and Nelson, W. W. 1973. Bromoxynil for control of common cocklebur and wild common sunflower in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21: 103106.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. C. and Hibberd, K. A. 1985. Evidence for the interaction of an imidazolinone herbicide with leucine, valine, and isoleucine metabolism. Weed Sci. 33: 479483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, J. R., Al-Khatib, K., and Currie, R. S. 1999. Cross-resistance of imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) to selected imidazolinone, sulfonylurea, and triazolopyrimidine herbicides. Weed Technol. 13: 489493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, P., Woodworth, A. R., Rosen, B. A., Subramanian, M. V., and Siehl, D. L. 1995. A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetolactate synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 1738117385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bestman, H. D., Devine, M. D., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1990. Herbicide chlorsulfuron decreases assimilate transport out of treated leaves of field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.) seedling. Plant Physiol. 93: 14411448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, D. L., Long, J. H., and Maddux, L. D. 1991. Using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5: 834840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, P. W., Maddux, L. D., Moshier, L. J., and Stahlman, P. W. 1996. Common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 10: 317321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harader, P. and Ascheman, R. 1976. Bentazon for common sunflower control in soybeans. Proc. North Central Weed Conf. 31:92.Google Scholar
LaRossa, R. A. and Schloss, J. V. 1984. The sulfonylurea herbicide sulfometuron methyl is an extremely potent and selective inhibitor of acetolactate synthase in Salmonella typhimurium . J. Biol. Chem. 259: 87539758.Google ScholarPubMed
Nalewaja, J. D., Woznica, Z., and Manthey, F. A. 1990. Sodium bicarbonate antagonism of 2,4-D amine. Weed Technol. 4: 588591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neter, J., Wasserman, W. W., and Kutner, M. H. 1985. Residual analysis. In Applied Linear Statistical Models, Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design. 2nd ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin. pp. 609615.Google Scholar
Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron, inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75: 827831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regehr, D. L., Peterson, D. E., Ohlenbusch, P. D., Fick, W. H., Stahlman, P. W., and Kuhlman, D. K. 1999. Chemical weed control for field crops, pastures, rangeland, and noncropland. Agric. Exp. Stn. Prog. Rep. 826. 72 p.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. pp. 83140.Google Scholar
Sathasivan, K., Haughn, G. W., and Murai, N. 1991. Molecular basis of imidazolinone herbicide resistance in Arabidopsis thalina var Columbia. Plant Physiol. 97: 10441050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, E. E. and Bridge, L. D. 1982. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 30: 514519.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 1991. Physiological effects of the imidazolinone herbicides. In Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp 129-137.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 11: 241247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 1993. Effect of preplant tillage, post-plant cultivation, and herbicides on weed density in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 728734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 1995. Response of sugarbeet, common sunflower, and common cocklebur to clopyralid or desmedipham plus phenmedipham. J. Sugar Beet Res. 32: 8996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 9 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 26th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Control of Imazethapyr-Resistant Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Soybean (Glycine max) and Corn (Zea mays)
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Control of Imazethapyr-Resistant Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Soybean (Glycine max) and Corn (Zea mays)
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Control of Imazethapyr-Resistant Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Soybean (Glycine max) and Corn (Zea mays)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *