Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids

  • John L. Lindquist and David A. Mortensen (a1)

Abstract

Improved crop tolerance and weed suppressive ability are tactics that may reduce the negative effect of weeds on crop yield. Irrigated field experiments were conducted to compare leaf area index (LAI), intercepted photosynthetic photon flux (PPF), and relative tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability among two old (circa 1940) and two modern corn hybrids. Each hybrid was grown in monoculture and in mixture with velvetleaf at 1, 4, 16, and 40 plants m−1 row. Plants were periodically harvested in monoculture plots to obtain estimates of corn LAI, and PPF interception was measured. Variation in hybrid tolerance to velvetleaf competition for light was evaluated by comparing among hybrids the coefficients of a regression of corn yield loss on velvetleaf density. Velvetleaf seed capsule production in the presence of each hybrid was compared to evaluate variation in velvetleaf suppressive ability among hybrids. Maximum corn yield loss was 32% lower for the two old hybrids, and velvetleaf capsule production was reduced by 62% at low velvetleaf densities in 1995 compared to the modern hybrids. In 1996, yield loss of the modern hybrid 3394 was 74% lower than that of the other three hybrids at low velvetleaf densities, whereas maximum yield loss of the old hybrid 336 was 44% lower at high densities. Velvetleaf capsule production did not vary among hybrids at any velvetleaf density in 1996. Hybrids with greater tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability also had greater LAI and PPF interception, suggesting optimized corn LAI and PPF interception may be useful in an integrated weed management program.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915; jlindquist@unl.edu

References

Hide All
Berkowitz, A. R. 1988. Competition for resources in weed–crop mixtures. Pages 89-120 in Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Callaway, M. B. 1990. A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. Am. J. Alternative Agric. 7: 169180.
Callaway, M. B. and Forcella, F. 1992. Crop tolerance to weeds. Pages 100-131 in Callaway, M. B. and Francis, C. A., eds. Crop Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture Systems. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Christensen, S. 1994. Crop weed competition and herbicide performance in cereal species and varieties. Weed Res. 34: 2936.
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107: 239252.
Cousens, R. D. and Fletcher, D. J. 1990. Experimental design for screening competitiveness of crop cultivars. Pages 163-165 in Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conf. Adelaide, S. Australia: Crop Science Society of Australia, with assistance from the Wheat Research Council of Australia.
Duvick, D. N. 1992. Cenetic contributions to advances in yield of U.S. maize. Maydica 37: 6979.
Forcella, F. 1987. Tolerance of weed competition associated with high leaf atea expansion rate in tall fescue. Crop Sci. 27: 146147.
Jennings, P. R. and Aquino, R. C. 1968. Studies on competition in rice. III. Mechanisms of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22: 529542.
Jordan, N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecol. Appl. 3: 8491.
Kropff, M. J. and van Laar, H. H. 1993. Modelling crop–weed interactions. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International and the International Rice Research Institute. 274 p.
Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B., and Coombes, N. E. 1996. Interaction between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and diclofop to reduce the cost of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) control. Weed Sci. 44: 634639.
Levitt, J. 1980. Response of plants to environmental stresses. 2nd ed, Volume 2. New York: Academic Press. 607 p.
Lindquist, J. L. 1997. An Ecophysiological Approach to Understanding Corn Tolerance and Velvetleaf Suppressive Ability. Ph.D. thesis. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. 156 p.
Lindquist, J. L. and Kropff, M. J. 1996. Applications of an ecophysiological model for irrigated rice (Oryza sativa)– Echinochloa competition. Weed Sci. 44: 5256.
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Clay, S. A., Schmenk, R., Kells, J. J., Howatt, K., and Westra, P. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)–velvetleaf (Abutilon theopbrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 44: 309313.
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Johnson, B. E. 1998. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron. J. In press.
Lotz, L.A.P., Christensen, S., Cloutier, D., er al. 1996. Prediction of the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields based on the relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Res. 36: 93101.
McLachlan, S. M., Tollenaar, M., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F. 1993. Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) . Weed Sci. 41: 568573.
Murphy, S. D., Yakubu, Y., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1996. Effect of planting patterns and inter-row cultivation on competition between corn (Zea mays) and late emerging weeds. Weed Sci. 44: 856870.
Ottman, M. J. and Welch, L. F. 1989. Planting patterns and radiation interception, plant nutrient concentration, and yield in corn. Agron. J. 81: 167174.
Ratkowsky, D. A. 1983. Nonlinear regression modeling: a unified practical approach. New York: Marcel Dekker. 276 p.
Salonen, J. 1992. Efficacy of reduced herbicide doses in spring cereals of different competitive ability. Weed Res. 32: 483491.
Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Responses of corn hybrids to yellow foxtail competition. Weeds 9: 132136.
Swinton, S. M., Buhler, D. D., Forcella, F., Gunsolus, J. L., and King, R. P. 1994. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Sci. 42: 103109.
Tetio-Kagho, F. and Gardner, F. P. 1988. Responses of maize to plant population density. I. Canopy development, light relationships, and vegetative growth. Agron. J. 80: 930935.
Tollenaar, M., Dibo, A. A., Aguilera, A., Wiese, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994a. Effect of crop density on weed interference in maize. Agron. J. 86: 591595.
Tollenaar, M., Nissanka, S. P., Aguilera, A., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994b. Effect of weed interference and soil nitrogen on four maize hybrids. Agron. J. 86: 596601.
Tollenaar, M., Aguilera, A., and Nissanka, S. P. 1997. Grain yield is reduced more by weed interference in an old than in a new maize hybrid. Agron. J. 89: 239246.
Wicks, G. A., Ramsel, R. E., Nordquist, P. T., Schmidt, J. W., and Challaiah, . 1986. Impact of wheat cultivars on esrablishmenr and suppression of summer annual weeds. Agron. J. 78: 5962.
Williams, W. A., Loomis, R. S., Duncan, W. G., Dovrat, A., and Nunez, F. A. 1968. Canopy architecture at various population densities and the growth and grain yield of corn. Crop Sci. 8: 303308.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed