Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:53:19.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Open Ecologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2020

Devin Griffiths  and
Deanna K. Kreisel Open the ORCID record for Deanna K. Kreisel [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This collection of essays turns to the nineteenth century in order to weigh the legacy of its holistic conception of systems and to resurrect alternative discourses of openness, permeability, and indeterminate relation. If modern ecocriticism has sometimes been hobbled by a restrictively organic, harmonious conception of how ecologies work, we wager that a return to Victorian interrogations of natural and social collectives can furnish more open, less integrated models for how assemblages operate. The nineteenth century saw both the first acceleration of anthropogenic climate change and the birth of a host of sciences-economic, social, geological, energetic, and (yes) ecological-that now struggle to address the planetary implications of that acceleration. Our growing awareness that we are now living in the long tail of this conjuncture and at the birth of the Anthropocene has prompted a re-evaluation of what we think we know about how nature and society work, and how they might work together.

Type
Introduction
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 48 , Special Issue 1: Open Ecologies , Spring 2020 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ahmed, Sara. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacy. Exposed: Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alaimo, Stacy. “Sustainable This, Sustainable That: New Materialisms, Posthumanism, and Unknown Futures.” PMLA 127, no. 3 (2012): 558–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albritton, Vicky, and Jonsson, Fredrik Albritton. Green Victorians: The Simple Life in John Ruskin's Lake District. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anker, Elizabeth S., and Felski, Rita. Critique and Postcritique. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anker, Peder. Imperial Ecology: Environmental Order in the British Empire, 1895–1945. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. New York: Verso, 2010.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy. 2 vols. New York: Zone Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Economy of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Ernst. The Principle of Hope. Translated by Plaice, Neville, Plaice, Stephen, and Knight, Paul. 3 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Carrington, Damian. “Arctic Stronghold of World's Seeds Flooded after Permafrost Melts.” The Guardian, May 19, 2017.Google Scholar
Carroll, Siobhan. An Empire of Air and Water: Uncolonizable Space in the British Imagination, 1750–1850. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, Frederic E.Research Methods in Ecology. Lincoln: University Publishing Co., 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. Stone: An Ecology of the Inhuman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, William A.Embodied: Victorian Literature and the Senses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John. “Naturing the Nation: Aliens, Apocalypse and the Postcolonial State.” Journal of Southern African Studies 27, no. 3 (2001): 627–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Jeremy. The Birth of the Anthropocene. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Delbourgo, James. Collecting the World: Hans Sloane and the Origins of the British Museum. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch. Edited by Ashton, Rosemary. London: Penguin, 1994.Google Scholar
Endersby, Jim. Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. “How the Victorian Novel Got Realistic, Reactionary, and Great.” Interdisciplinary Nineteenth-Century Studies Conference, Asheville, North Carolina, March 10–13, 2016.Google Scholar
Gidal, Eric. Ossianic Unconformities: Bardic Poetry in the Industrial Age. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gigante, Denise. Life: Organic Form and Romanticism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, David M., and Crist, Thomas O.. “Experimental Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Rove Beetles and Ants: Patch Area or Edge?” Oikos 90, no. 3 (2000): 525–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, Suzanne. George Eliot and Community: A Study in Social Theory and Fictional Form. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Devin. The Age of Analogy: Science and Literature between the Darwins. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Grove, Richard. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens, and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Guha, Ramachandra, and Alier, Juan Martínez. Varieties of Environmentalism: Essays North and South. London: Earthscan, 1997.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J.Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields: Metaphors of Organicism in Twentieth-Century Developmental Biology. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–81. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J.Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna J.When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Building Dwelling Thinking.” In Poetry, Language, Thought, translated by Hofstadter, Albert, 141–59. New York: Harper Collins, 2001.Google Scholar
Heise, Ursula K.Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensley, Nathan K., and Steer, Philip. Ecological Form: System and Aesthetics in the Age of Empire. New York: Fordham University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heringman, Noah. Sciences of Antiquity: Romantic Antiquarianism, Natural History, and Knowledge Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörl, Erich, ed. General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London: Verso, 2007.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan, and Nersessian, Anahid. “Form and Explanation.” Critical Inquiry 43, no. 3 (2017): 650–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreisel, Deanna K. “Sustainability.” Victorian Literature and Culture 46, nos. 3–4 (2018): 895–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucich, John. “Modernization and the Organic Society.” In The Oxford History of the Novel in English, edited by Parrinder, Patrick, 3:343–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurance, William F., and Yensen, Eric. “Predicting the Impacts of Edge Effects in Fragmented Habitats.” Biological Conservation 55, no. 1 (1991): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidström, Susanna, West, Simon, Katzschner, Tania, Isabel Pérez-Ramos, M., and Twidle, Hedley. “Invasive Narratives and the Inverse of Slow Violence: Alien Species in Science and Society.” Environmental Humanities 7, no. 1 (2015): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. “The Meaning of Romanticism for the Historian of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas 2, no. 3 (1941): 257–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malm, Andreas. Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. New York: Verso, 2016.Google Scholar
“Manifesto of the V21 Collective.” V21 (blog), http://v21collective.org/manifesto-of-the-v21-collective-ten-theses (accessed August 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.” In Karl Marx: 1857–61, vol. 28 of The Collected Works, by Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick, 17–48. New York: International Publishers, 1987.Google Scholar
Maturana Romesín, Humberto, and Varela, Francisco J.. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston: D. Reidel, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medovoi, Leerom. “A Contribution to the Critique of Political Ecology: Sustainability as Disavowal.” New Formations 69 (2010): 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menely, Tobias, and Taylor, Jesse Oak, eds. Anthropocene Reading: Literary History in Geologic Times. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. Kant's Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
“Middlemarch. By George Eliot. Book II—Old and Young.” The Athenaeum 2310 (February 3, 1872).Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. “Dombey's Perspective.” The Dickens Project, Santa Cruz, California, July 2016.Google Scholar
Miller, David Albert. “Narrative and Its Discontents: Jane Austen, George Eliot, Stendhal.” PhD diss., Yale University, 1977.Google Scholar
Miller, Elizabeth Carolyn. “Ecology.” Victorian Literature and Culture 46, nos. 3–4 (2018): 653–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Jason W.Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso, 2015.Google Scholar
Morris, William. News from Nowhere. Edited by Leopold, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. “The Dark Ecology of Elegy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy, edited by Weisman, Karen A., 251–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. “Guest Column: Queer Ecology.” PMLA 125, no. 2 (2010): 273–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Muñoz, José Esteban. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: New York University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Murcia, Carolina. “Edge Effects in Fragmented Forests: Implications for Conservation.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10, no. 2 (1995): 58–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, Maggie. The Argonauts. Minneapolis: Graywolf, 2016.Google Scholar
Nersessian, Anahid. Utopia, Limited: Romanticism and Adjustment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishime, LeiLani, and Williams, Kim D. Hester. “Introduction: Why Racial Ecologies?” In Racial Ecologies, edited by Nishime, LeiLani and Williams, Kim D. Hester, 3–15. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Nixon, Rob. “Environmentalism and Postcolonialism.” In Postcolonial Studies and Beyond, edited by Loomba, Ania and Kaul, Suvir, 233–51. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, UN Documents, http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm#IV.Google Scholar
Pasquinelli, Matteo. “What an Apparatus Is Not: On the Archaeology of the Norm in Foucault, Canguilhem, and Goldstein.” Parrhesia 22 (2015): 79–89.Google Scholar
Phillips, John F. V.The Biotic Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickerill, Jenny. “Black and Green: The Future of Indigenous-Environmentalist Relations in Australia.” Environmental Politics 18 (2018): 1–24.Google Scholar
Pierce, Trevor. “‘A Great Complication of Circumstances’: Darwin and the Economy of Nature.” Journal of the History of Biology 43, no. 3 (2010): 493–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. “The Model System of Contemporary Literary Criticism.” Critical Inquiry 27 (2001): 408–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Robert J.The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Jordana (Jordy). “The Molecularization of Sexuality: On Some Primitivisms of the Present.” Theory & Event 17, no. 2 (2014), https://muse.jhu.edu/article/546470.Google Scholar
Scott, Heidi C. M.Chaos and Cosmos: Literary Roots of Modern Ecology in the British Nineteenth Century. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Scranton, Roy. Learning to Die in the Anthropocene: Reflections on the End of a Civilization. San Francisco: City Lights Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Siskin, Clifford. System: The Shaping of Modern Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Smith, Andrea. “Queer Theory and Native Studies: The Heteronormativity of Settler Colonialism.” GLQ 16, nos. 1–2 (2010): 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffer, Robert C. “Haeckel, Darwin, and Ecology.” Quarterly Review of Biology 32, no. 2 (1957): 138–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoekl, Allan. “‘After the Sublime,’ After the Apocalypse: Two Versions of Sustainability in Light of Climate Change.” Diacritics 41, no. 3 (2013): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansley, A. G. “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms.” Ecology 16, no. 3 (1935): 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jesse Oak. The Sky of Our Manufacture: The London Fog in British Fiction from Dickens to Woolf. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Thomas, Julia Adeney. “History and Biology in the Anthropocene: Problems of Scale, Problems of Value.” American Historical Review 119, no. 5 (2014): 1587–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Turner, James. Philology: The Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, with a New Prologue. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Wellek, René. “The Concept of ‘Romanticism’ in Literary History II: The Unity of European Romanticism.” Comparative Literature 1, no. 2 (1949): 147–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellek, René, and Warren, Austin. Theory of Literature. London: Jonathan Cape, 1966.Google Scholar
Whyte, Kyle. “Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” English Language Notes 55, nos. 1/2 (2017): 153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Elizabeth A.Gut Feminism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worster, Donald. Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar