Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T07:59:42.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Politics and the urban process: the case of Philadelphia, 1800–54

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

Extract

History is a discipline in a state of perpetual crisis. Thus, in 1970, Arthur Marwick explained much of the controversy over historians' use of social science methods and theories in the latest incarnation of a social history which emerged after the Second World War. History's flirtations with the social sciences are recurrent. So are its crises. In the 1980s, Marwick's view of cyclical crises in history has been borne out. The use in history of ‘illuminating’ social science methods and concepts is now widely accepted. A spirit of tolerance, respect and professional courtesy has replaced the outward hostility which until recently characterized exchanges between the so-called ‘traditional’ and new social historians respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Marwick, Arthur, The Nature of History, 2nd edition (1981), 194200.Google Scholar

2 Stone, L., ‘History and the social sciences in the twentieth century’ in Stone, L., ed., The Past and the Present (1981), 20–1.Google Scholar

3 For the new spirit of toleration see Robert W. Fogel and G. R. Elton, Which Road to the Past? Two Views of History (1983). For particularly strong statements by traditionalists on social science history and social science historians on traditionalists respectively see Jacques Barzun, Clio and the Doctors (1974) and Landes, D. and Tilly, C., History as Social Science (1971).Google Scholar

4 Bender, T., ‘Wholes and parts: the need for synthesis in American history’, Journal of American History, 73 (1986), 120–36;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Leuchtenberg, W., ‘The pertinence of political history: reflections on the significance of the state in American history’, Journal of American History, 73 (1986), 585600;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Stone, L., ‘The revival of narrative: reflections on a new old history’, Past and Present, 85 (1971), 234.Google Scholar

5 Genovese, E. and Fox-Genovese, E., ‘The political crisis of social history: a marxist perspective’, Journal of Social History, 10 (1976–7), 205–20;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Judt, T., ‘A clown in regal purple: social history and the historians’, History Workshop, 7 (1979), 6694;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Himmelfarb, G., The New History and the Old, (1987).Google Scholar In contrast to the term ‘political arena’ which is widely used in the literature to denote the formal political machinery, the words ‘the political’ as used here embrace a wider range of activities than those associated purely with political parties and the instruments of government.

6 McDonald, T.J., ‘The problem of the political in recent American urban history: liberal pluralism and the rise of functionalism’, Social History, 10 (1985), 323–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Hershberg, T., ‘The new urban history: towards an interdisciplinary history of the city’ in Hershberg, T., ed., Philadelphia: Work, Space, Family, and Group Experience in the Nineteenth Century. Essays towards an Interdisciplinary History of the City (1981).Google Scholar

8 See Dahl, R., Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City (1961)Google Scholar and his many critics; or Banfield, E.C. and Wilson, J.Q., City Politics (1963)Google Scholar where the authors claim to study urban politics because it ‘affords exceptional opportunities to generalize about American political culture, American democracy, and democracy in general’, p.2. For urban politics as a testing ground for theories of the capitalist state see Dunleavy, P., Urban Political Analysis: The Politics of Collective Consumption (1980);CrossRefGoogle Scholar Castells, Manuel, The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Yates, Douglas, The Ungovernable City: The Politics of Urban Problems and Policy Making (1977);Google Scholar Lineberry, R. and Sharansky, I., Urban Politics and Public Poetry, (1978);Google Scholar David, S.M. and Peterson, P.E., Urban Politics and Public Policy: The City in Crisis, 2nd edition (1976).Google Scholar

10 McDonald, , op.cit., 326–8.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., 343.

12 McDonald also makes this recommendation, ibid., 345.

13 Price, E.K., The History of the Consolidation of the City of Philadelphia (1873), 21.Google Scholar

14 ‘An act to incorporate the City of Philadelphia…1789, Ordinances of the corporation of, and acts of assembly relating to the City of Philadelphia… (1851)—henceforth referred to as OAA—and acts amending the city charter in each year 1796–9 published in the same volume, pp.62–3, 65–7, 69, and 73–5 respectively.

15 Commercial elites' extensive hold over the city's political offices, and its economic institutions was established through a prosopographical survey based on contemporary biographies and city and business directories too numerous to mention here. See Greenstein, D.I., ‘Urban politics and the urban process: two case studies of Philadelphia’ (Oxford D.Phil, thesis, 1987), 5365.Google Scholar

16 Scharf, J.T. and Westcott, T., History of Philadelphia, 1609–1884, 3 vols (1884), I, 527, 543;Google Scholar Greenstein, , op.cit., 86108.Google Scholar

17 ‘An ordinance for auditing and controlling the expenditure of the city… 1st Oct 1835’, OAA, 211–15.Google Scholar

18 Bridges, Amy, A City in the Republic: Antebellum New York and the Origins of Machine Politics (1984), 1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Snyder, CM., The Jacksonian Heritage: Pennsylvania Politics, 1833–1848 (1958), 21–3, 65.Google Scholar

20 Hartz, L., Economic Policy and Democratic Thought in Pennsylvania, 1776–1860 (1948), 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Ferguson, P.C., ‘The response to need: welfare and poverty in the city of Philadelphia’ (University of Pennsylvania Ph.D. thesis, 1977), 1617.Google Scholar

22 Leffman, H., ‘The consolidation of Philadelphia’, Philadelphia History, 1 (1908), 27;Google Scholar Campbell, W.B., ‘Old towns and districts of Philadelphia’, Philadelphia History, 4 (1942), 94149;Google Scholar Price, op. cit., 28.

23 Price, op. cit., 88; Campbell, op. cit., 139.

24 Spann, E.K., The New Metropolitan New York (1981);Google Scholar Teaford, J., City and Suburb: The Political Fragmentation of Metropolitan America, 1850–1970 (1979).Google Scholar

25 Cutler, W.W. III and Gillette, H.F. Jr, ‘The emergence of the modern metropolis’ in Cutler, W.W. and Gillette, H.F. Jr, eds, The Divided Metropolis: Social and Spatial Dimensions of Philadelphia, 1800–1975 (1980).Google Scholar

26 Chichester, C.E., Department of Supplying the City with Water: History of the Works… (1860), 69;Google Scholar Scharf and Westcott, op. cit., I, 643–5, III, 216–7; Howland, C.A., Philadelphia's Gas Problem (1926), 6;Google Scholar ‘An ordinance providing for the superintendence of the Broad Street Railroad’, OAA, 200–1;Google Scholar Campbell, op. cit., 140.

27 Greenstein, op. cit., 21, 424–30.

28 Warner, Sam Bass Jr, The Private City: Philadelphia in Three Periods of its Growth (1968), 223.Google Scholar

29 Baltzell, D., Philadelphia Gentlemen: The Making of a National Upperclass (1971);Google Scholar Zachary, A., ‘Social thought in the Philadelphia leadership community’ (University of Pennsylvania, Ph.D. thesis, 1975);Google Scholar Stewart, J.D., ‘Philadelphia politics in the Gilded Age’ (St John's University, Ph.D. thesis, 1973).Google Scholar

30 Laurie, B., The Working People of Philadelphia, 1800–1850 (1980), 11;Google Scholar Blumin, S., ‘Mobility in a nineteenth-century city: Philadelphia, 1820–1860’, (University of Pennsylvania, Ph.D. thesis, 1968), 113–30.Google Scholar

31 Blumin, op. cit., 113–30.

32 Formisano, R.P., ‘Federalists and Republicans: parties, yes—system, no’Google Scholar and Shade, W.G., ‘Political pluralism and party development: the creation of a modern party system, 1815–1852’, in Kleppner, P., ed., The Evolution of American Electoral Systems (1981);Google Scholar Snyder, op. cit., 21–3, 65.

33 Phillips, K.T., ‘William Duane, Philadelphia's Democratic Republicans and the origins of modern polities’, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 70 (1977), 305–87Google Scholar, hereafter referred to as PMHB.

34 Cutler, and Gillette, op. cit.

35 Katznelson, I., City Trenches: The Patterning of Class in the United States (1981), 52.Google Scholar

36 Frisch, Michael as quoted in Henretta, J., ‘Social history as lived and written’, American Historical Review, 84 (1979), 1322.Google Scholar

37 Lindstrom, Diane, Economic Development in the Philadelphia Region, 1810–1850 (1978), 212, 91;Google Scholar Zachary, A., ‘The Philadelphia elite before Jackson’, PMHB, 99 (1975), 293–5.Google Scholar

38 Scharf and Westcott, op. cit., III, 2212–18.

39 Greenstein, op. cit., 53–6.

40 Clarke, J.S. Jr, ‘The railroad struggle for Pittsburgh: 43 years of the Philadelphia-Baltimore trade rivalry, 1828–1871’, PMHB, 99 (1975), 293Google Scholar

5 Klein, P.S., Pennsylvania Politics, 1817–1832: A Game Without Rules (1940), 120–60.Google Scholar

41 Snyder, op. cit., 23–6.

42 Hartz, op. cit., 40–6, 82, 168.

43 Burgess, G.H. and Kennedy, M.C., The Centennial History of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company (1949), 38.Google Scholar

44 Statement of the Finances of the County of Philadelphia…1853–1854 (1854).Google Scholar

45 Dahl, op. cit., 11–84; Banfield and Wilson, op. cit., 149.

46 Greenstein, op. cit., 57–63.

47 Price, op. cit., 21.

48 Greenstein, op. cit., 137–8. Names were taken from Scharf and Westcott, op. cit., I, 595–611.

49 Hartz, op. cit., 10–13.

50 Laurie, op. cit., 11.

51 Report to the Select and Common Councils of the City of Philadelphia…signed Thomas Taylor and Daniel Barr et al. (1832);Google Scholar and Blumin, op. cit., 113–30.

52 Blumin, op. cit., 37–9; B. Laurie and M. Schmitz, ‘Manufacturing and productivity: the making of an industrial base, Philadelphia, 1850–1880’, in Hershberg, ed., op. cit., 43–92.

53 Blumin, op. cit., 45–7.

54 Gough, R.J., ‘Towards a theory of class and social conflict: a social history of wealthy Philadelphia, 1775–1800’ (University of Pennsylvania Ph.D. thesis, 1977), 383–9.Google Scholar

55 Campbell, op. cit., 140 and T. Westcott, Biographies of Philadelphians… (1861).

56 Ferguson, op. cit., 43–4, 284; Phillips, op. cit.

57 M. Feldberg, The Philadelphia Bible Riots of 1844: A Study of Ethnic Conflict (1975) and Katznelson, op. cit.

58 A.N. Burstein, ‘Immigrants and residential mobility: the Irish and Germans in Philadelphia, 1800–1880’ in Hershberg, ed., op. cit., 181–6.

59 This is Light's thesis in ‘Ethnicity and the urban ecology in a nineteenth-century city: Philadelphia's Irish, 1840–1890’, (University of Pennsylvania, Ph.D. thesis, 1979).Google Scholar Also see Light, D.B. Jr, ‘The reformation of Philadelphia Catholicism’, PMHB, 112 (1988), 376.Google Scholar

60 Ferguson, op. cit., 12, 30–1.

61 The discussion of party politics draws on Klein, op. cit., Hartz, op. cit., and Snyder, op. cit.

62 Klein, op. cit., 120–60.

63 Sullivan, W.A., ‘Philadelphia labor in the Age of Jackson’, Pennsylvania History, 15 (1948), 315.Google Scholar

64 Bernstein, L., ‘The working people of Philadelphia from colonial times to the General Strike of 1835’, PMHB, 74 (1950), 331–2.Google Scholar

65 Sullivan, W.A., Industrial Workers of Pennsylvania, 1800–1850 (1955), 178–9.Google Scholar

66 Bernstein, op. cit., 331–2.

67 Laurie, op. cit., 111–5.

68 Madonna, G.T., ‘The Pennsylvania Jacksonians and the Bank War’, (University of Delaware, Ph.D. thesis, 1975), 191–2;Google Scholar Akagi, R.H., ‘The Pennsylvania Constitution of 1838’, PMHB, 48 (1924), 301–22;Google Scholar Snyder, op. cit., 97.

69 Mueller, H.R., The Whig Party in Pennsylvania (1925), 55.Google Scholar

70 Geffen, E.N., ‘Violence in Philadelphia in the 1840s and 1850s’, Pennsylvania History, 36 (1969), 383–9.Google Scholar

71 Snyder, op. cit., 48–9.

72 Laurie, op. cit., 117. For a general work on Philadelphia revivalism see M.L. Bell, Crusade in the City: Revivalism in Nineteenth-century Philadelphia (1977).

73 Geffen, E.N., ‘Philadelphia Protestantism reacts to social reform movements before the Civil War’, Pennsylvania History, 30 (1963), 208.Google Scholar

74 Montgomery, D., ‘The shuttle and the cross: weavers and artisans in the Kensington riots of 1844’, Journal of Social History, 5 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

75 Warner, Jr, op. cit., 93–4; Geary, M.T., A History of Third Parties in Pennsylvania, 1840–1860 (1938), 41–4.Google Scholar

76 Laurie, op. cit., 39. For a general history of the party see Tabachnik, L., ‘The origins of the Know-Nothing party in Philadelphia’, (Columbia University, Ph.D. thesis, 1973).Google Scholar

77 Feldberg, op. cit., 167.