Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:48:59.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editorial note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Urban History Yearbook , Volume 16 , May 1989 , pp. v - x
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

Notes

1 For a review of that tradition, and of the content and impact of the Urban History Yearbook, 1974Google Scholar, see Bloomfield, E., ‘The Urban History Yearbook— interdisciplinary forum or indispensable research tool?’, Urban History Review/Revue d'histoire urbaine, 16 (1987), 75–7.Google Scholar

2 For a review of this work see Mohl, R.A., ‘;The new urban history and its alternatives: some reflections on recent U.S. scholarship on the twentieth century city’, Urban History Yearbook, 1983, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 ‘Register of Research in Progress on the History of London’, The London Journal, 13 (1987–1988), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Dyos, H.J., ‘Editorial’, Urban History Yearbook, 1974, 5–6Google Scholar and his inaugural lecture, Urbanity and Suburbanity, 1973.Google Scholar

5 Wheatley, P., ‘European urbanization: origins and consummation’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 17 (1986), 415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Rollison, D., ‘The bourgeois soul of John Smyth of Nibley’, Social History, 12 (1987), 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Ibid., his emphasis.