Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T14:15:04.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Address: Collective Mentalities in mid-Seventeenth-Century England: IV. Cross Currents: Neutrals, Trimmers and Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

G. E. Aylmer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the most striking changes from the text-book generalisations of my school days is the emphasis given nowadays to those who were not committed to either side in the Civil War, those who tried and in some cases succeeded in keeping clear of the conflict altogether. Indeed so great has been the stress on neutrals and neutralism and on the general reluctance to take sides and to begin fighting at all in 1642, that we are in danger of having to explain how a mere handful of obstinate or fanatical extremists on each side contrived to drag the country down into the abyss of Civil War. I have said enough in my previous addresses in this series to make my own position clear on that. Among Royalists, including the King himself, there were enough who believed that rebellion must be put down, whether they were more concerned to defend the constitutional prerogatives of the Crown, the government and liturgy of the Church, or the whole existing fabric of society. Correspondingly there were enough Parliamentarians who believed that religion, liberty and property were in deadly peril, through the design for Popery and arbitrary government. If these beliefs had been confined to a few dozen or even score of men on each side, it is not credible that a war would have begun in 1642, where fighting broke out be it noted in Lancashire, Yorkshire and Somerset before the preparations and manoeuverings of the two main armies led up to the campaign and battle of Edgehill.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 39 , December 1989 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Everitt, A. M., The Community of Kent and the Great Rebellion 1640–1660 (Leicester, 1966)Google Scholar; Morrill, J. S., The Revolt of the Provinces 1630–50 (revised edition, 1980)Google Scholar; Fletcher, A., The Outbreak of the English Civil War (1981)Google Scholar.

2 Broxap, E., The Great Civil War in Lancashire (1642–1651) (Manchester, 1910Google Scholar; reprinted Clifton, N. J., 1973), ch. iii; Newman, P. R., ‘The Royalist Armies in Northern England 1642–45’, D.Phil., Univ. of York (1978), ch. 1Google Scholar; Underdown, D., Somerset in the Civil War and Interregnum (Newton Abbot, 1973), ch.2Google Scholar; Gardiner, S. R., History of England…1603–42 (10 vols., 1883–1884), X, ch. cvGoogle Scholar. This excludes the King's two attempts to seize Hull, because no fighting took place involving loss of life.

3 Manning, B. S., ‘Neutrals and Neutralism in the English Civil War’, D.Phil., Univ. of Oxford (1955; deposited 1957)Google Scholar.

4 For example: The State of the Whole Kingdom … (1642), Wing S5324, royalist; [Prynne, William], A Soveraign Antidote To Prevent, Appease and Determine Our unnaturall and destructive Civill Wanes and Dissensions (1642)Google Scholar, Wing P4086, parliamentarian; A Miracle: An Honest Broker … (1642), Wing M2206, parliamentarian; A Plea for Moderation… (1642), Wing P2512, royalist.

5 History of the Rebellion… ed. Macray, W. D. (6 vols., Oxford, 1888), i. 69–71 (Book I, paras. 118–19)Google Scholar.

6 [Richard, ] Challenor, His Confession and Speech… (1643)Google Scholar, Wing C1800, p. 4. He is mis-spelt Chaloner in the DNB and by Wing.

7 The Whole Confession and Speech…of Mr Nathaniel Tompkins… (1643), Wing T1865. Clarendon says that he was Clerk of the Queen's, Council (Hist. Reb., Book VII, paras. 54–73)Google Scholar; he is not in the DNB. For the fullest account of Waller's Plot, see still Gardiner, , History of the Great Civil War 1642–1649 (3 vols., 1888–1891), chs. vii & viiiGoogle Scholar.

8 For Edmund Waller himself, see DNB; Introduction to Poems, ed. Drury, G. Thorn (2 vols., 1893)Google Scholar; Chernaik, W. L., The poetry of limitation: a study of Edmund Waller (New Haven, 1968)Google Scholar; Poems 1645 (etc.) (Menston, , Yorks, , 1971)Google Scholar, includes speeches in parliament, 1641–3; Henning, B. D. (ed.), History of Parliament. The House of Commons 1660–1690 (3 vols., 1983), iii. 653–7Google Scholar.

9 On Povey, the DNB is quite inadequate. His career can be pieced together fromUnderdown, D., Pride's Purge… (Oxford, 1971), pp. 104 n., 253, 383Google Scholar; Latham, R. & Matthews, W. (eds.), Pepys' Diary (11 vols. 1970–1983), x, Companion, pp. 344–5Google Scholar. Besides secondary sources on Cromwell's ‘Western Design’, for the 1650s and after see Cal. St. Papers Colonial, America and West Indies 1574–1660, pp. 460–96; ibid., Addenda, 1574–1674, pp. 135, 211, etc.; British Library, Additional MS 11411, Povey's West India letter book 1655–60.

10 Queries and Conjectures… Wing Q 165, in Erskine-Hill, G. & Storey, G. (eds.), Revolutionary Prose of the English Civil War (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 230–6, esp. p. 233Google Scholar.

11 Christie, R. C. (ed.), The Diary and Correspondence of Dr John Worthington, vol. 11, Part ii (Chetham Soc., CXIV, 1886), p. 315Google Scholar.

12 This is to assume that he, and not his uncle Sir William Coventry, was the author. For a brief discussion of this and an accessible version of the text, see Kenyon, J. P. (ed), Halifax Complete Works (Harmondsworth, 1969)Google Scholar; the older, classic text is Foxcroft, H. C., Life and Letters of… Halifax (2 vols., 1898), ii. 273et seq.Google Scholar; also Raleigh, W. (ed.), Works of… Halifax (Oxford, 1912)Google Scholar, and for more recent discussions, Faulkner, T. C., ‘Halifax's The Character of a Trimmer and L'Estrange's Attack on Trimmers in The Observator’, Huntington Library Quarterly, xxxvii (1973–1974), pp. 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; M. N. Brown, ‘Trimmers and Moderates in the Reign of Charles II’, ibid., pp. 311–36.

13 Skinner, Q., ‘Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy’ in Aylmer, G. E. (ed.), The Interregnum The Quest for Settlement 1646–1660 (1972 and paperback 1974), pp. 79–98, 208–9, 222–4Google Scholar, which is still in my view the best account.

14 Frank, J., Cromwell's Press Agent: A Critical Biography of Marchamont Nedham, 1620–1678 (Lanham, Md., 1980)Google Scholar.

15 Aylmer, G. E., The King's Servants… 1625–42 (1961; 2nd edn. 1974), p. 389Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., via the index, under ‘Neutrals’, etc.

17 Underdown, D., ‘The Chalk and the Cheese: Contrasts among the English Clubmen’, Past & Present, lxxxv (1979), pp. 25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Manning, ‘Thesis’, ch. 6; Morrill, Revolt of Provinces, via index; Hutton, R., ‘The Worcestershire Clubmen in the English Civil War’, Midland History, v (1979–1980) pp. 39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; P.Gladwish, ‘The Herefordshire Clubmen: a re-assessment’, ibid., x (1985), pp. 62–71.

19 The Desires and Resolutions of the Club-Men of … Dorset and Wilts … (1645), Wing D1180, Thomason E. 292/24, dated 12 July.

20 Trevor-Roper, H. R., Historical Essays (1957), ‘Erasmus’Google Scholar; Religion, The Reformation, and Social Change (1967), ‘The Origins of the Enlightenment’; Renaissance Essays (1985), chs. 3, 4, 7; and most recently Catholics, Anglicans and Puritans (1987).

21 Hayward, J. C., ‘New Directions in Studies of the Falkland Circle’, The 17th Century, II, i (1987), 19–48, quotation from p. 20Google Scholar. I am extremely grateful to Dr Hayward for lending me a copy of his Cambridge Ph.D. thesis (1982); it is a matter of regret that neither his nor two earlier theses on Great Tew have been published. I am also grateful to DrBeale, P., the editor of Index of English Literary Manuscripts (1980–, in progress)Google Scholar.

22 The account which I have found most helpful is Orr, R. R., Reason and Authority The Thought of William Chillingworth (Oxford, 1967)Google Scholar.

23 The first edition of the Microcosmographie was 1628, revised STC, no. 7439; the earliest known MS is 1627 (Bodleian Library, English Poetry, E. 112). I am not clear why in the Addenda and Corrigenda to the DNB Earle's authorship is denied; by whatever date in the 1630s we are to think of the Great Tew Circle as being in existence, he was already a mature scholar, having been a fellow of Merton College since 1619.

24 See the claims made by Tuck, R. in his Natural Rights Theories: Origins and Development (Cambridge, 1979), ch. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The most recent assessment of Selden's scholarship in relation to his politics, but so far only reaching c. 1630, is Christianson, P., ‘Young John Selden and the Ancient Constitution, ca. 1610– 18’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 128, part 4 (1984), pp. 271–315Google Scholar and Selden, John, the Five Knights' Case, and Discretionary Imprisonment in Early Stuart England', Criminal Justice History, vi (1985), pp. 65–87Google Scholar.

25 Nicolson, M. H. (ed.), Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conivay, Henry More, and their friends, 1642–1684 (1930), p. 40 & n. 5Google Scholar.

26 Colie, R. L., Light and Enlightenment A Study of the Cambridge Platonists and the Dutch Arminians (Cambridge, 1957), esp. chs. i & iiGoogle Scholar. The suggestion that Samuel Hartlib and John Dury formed a link between the Dutch Remonstrants and the English Latitudinarians is unfortunately not pursued or documented; its relevance to Lord Dacre's argument is obvious.

27 Tulloch, J., Rational Theology and Christian Philosophy in England in the 17th Century (2 vols. Edinburgh and London, 1872), vol. iiGoogle Scholar; Passmore, J. A., Ralph Cudworth. An Interpretation (Cambridge, 1951)Google Scholar; Colie, Light & Enlightenment; Cragg, G. R. (ed.), The Cambridge Platonists (A Library of Protestant Thought, New York, 1968)Google Scholar; Patrides, C. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Platonists (Stratford-upon-Avon, no. 5, London, 1969)Google Scholar; see also Bush, D., English Literature in the Earlier 17th Century 1600–1660 (revised edn. Oxford, 1962), pp. 340–9 and appendicesGoogle Scholar. Needless to say, this note is not intended as a bibliography.

28 The Autobiography ofSymon Patrick, Bishop of Ely (Oxford, 1839), pp. 18–19Google Scholar.

29 BL, Sloane MS 1710, fo. 309 et seq. (late 17th or early 18th-century copies of the apparently lost originals); Eight Letters of Dr Anthony Tuckney and Dr Benjamin Whichcote…, bound with Salter, S. (ed.), Moral and Religious Aphorisms … of … Dr Whichcote (new edn. London, 1753)Google Scholar; the two texts seem identical. The letters have been quoted in part by Tulloch, Cragg, Patrides (and no doubt others), but have not so far as I am aware been reprinted in full anywhere.

30 Hutton, Sarah, ‘Thomas Jackson, Oxford Platonist, and William Twisse, Aristotelian’, Journal of the History of Ideas, xl (1978), 635–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I am very grateful to Dr Hutton for giving me copies of her articles, some in advance of publication, and for other helpful suggestions; she is currently re-editing the correspondence of Henry More, Anne Lady Conway and their circle. On Jackson's Arminianism, see now also Tyacke, N., Anti-Calvinists: The Rise of English Arminianism c. 1590–1640 (Oxford, 1987), via the indexGoogle Scholar.

31 Hayward, , ‘New Directions…’, pp. 29–30Google Scholar; Hammond, P., ‘Thomas Smith: a beleaguered humanist of the Interregnum’, Bull. Inst. Hist. Res., lvi (1983), pp. 180–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Twigg, J. D., ‘The parliamentary visitation of the University of Cambridge, 1644–1645’, E.H.R., xcviii (1983), pp. 513–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Journals of the House of Commons (folio, London, n.d.), 5, 1646–1648, pp. 97, 131Google Scholar.

34 Wing C7469. In Cragg and Patrides (the latter without the prefatory Dedication to the House); also, for a handy reprint if obtainable, R. Cudworth, A Sermon preached before the House of Commons March 31, 1647 (Facsimile Text Society, N.Y., 1930).

35 Aylmer, G. E., The State's Servants…1640–60 (1973), pp.71–2Google Scholar.

36 This is partly made clear in Worthington, , Diary & Correspondence (Chetham Soc., XIII, 1847, XXXVI, 1855, CXIV, 1886), I, 202–3, 216–17, II, ii, 378Google Scholar. For Whichcote's case, see also Heywood, J. & Wright, T., The Ancient Laws of the 15th century, for King's College, Cambridge, and for the public school of Eton College (1850), pp. 287–95Google Scholar.

37 Nicolson, Conway Letters, via the index; also Lynch, Kathleen M., ‘The Incomparable Lady Ranelagh’, in Butt, J. (ed.), Of Books and Humankind. Essays and Poems presented to Bonamy Dobree (1964), pp. 25–33Google Scholar.

38 For these totals, see Twigg, ‘Parliamentary Visitation’. The Oxford purges of the 1640s and 1660s are much the more fully documented: see The Register of the Visitors… 1647–58, ed. Burrows, M. (Camden Soc., new ser.xxix (1881)Google Scholar, and The Restoration Visitation…, ed. Varley, F.J. (Camden 3rd ser., lxxix, 1948, Camden Miscellany, xviii)Google Scholar. For Barlow, see The Genuine Remaines of that learned prelate Dr Thomas Barlow (1693), Wing B832; DNB and refs. in numerous other works, including histories ofThe Queen's College, Oxford, and the Bodleian Library.

39 Fuller, T., The History of the Worthies of England, ed. Nuttall, P. A. (3 vols., 1840), i. 112–13Google Scholar; Grigson, G. (ed.), The Oxford Book of Satirical Verse (Oxford, 1980), no. 69, pp. 158–60Google Scholar, and in other anthologies; Victoria County History, Berkshire, iii (1923), 125, ‘Cookham’

40 I have relied basically on G. D. Squibb, Dorset Incumbents, 1542–1731, reprinted from Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society, vols. 70–75 (1948–53), cross-checked against Matthews, A. G., Calamy Revised… Oxford, 1934)Google Scholar, and Walker Revised… (Oxford, 1948)Google Scholar. In the very few cases where these two distinguished authorities disagree about particular individuals, I have preferred the higher figures for extrusions and the lower for continuity, so as not to exaggerate the latter. For the most recent general treatment, see Green, I. M., ‘The Persecution of “Scandalous” and “malignant” parish clergy during the English Civil War’, E.H.R., xciv (1979), 507–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Spurr, J., ‘“Latitudinarianism” and the Restoration Church’, Histl. Jnl., xxxi (1988), 61–82Google Scholar. See Burnet, G., History of my own time, Part I, The Reign of Charles II, ed. Airy, O. (2 vols., Oxford, 1897), i.331–41, esp. p. 334Google Scholar.

42 S. P., A Brief Account… (1662, Wing P754), pp. 4–5, 6–9, 14–15, 19–21, 24.

43 (Oxford, 1666, Wing P 463, dedicated to Dr Bathurst, President of Trinity College), pp. 2, 4, 34, 40, 46, 76, 87, 104, 109–10.

44 Latham, & Matthews, (eds.), Pepys Diary, ix.485, 16 03 1669Google Scholar; S.P., A Brief Account, p. 7Google Scholar; Nicolson, (ed.), Conway Letters, p. 243Google Scholar; [Fowler, E.], Principles and Practices… (1670)Google Scholar, Wing F1711, Bodleian 80 A 16 Line. (I am extremely grateful to Mrs Mary Clapinson for identifying both of the manuscript annotations as being in Barlow's own hand.)

45 For a bibliography down to the early 1980s, see Shapiro, Barbara J., Probability and Certainty in 17th-century England: A Study of the Relationship between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law and Literature (Princeton, 1983), notes to ch. ii, pp. 273–87, & ch. iii, n. 2, pp. 287–8Google Scholar.

46 The handiest and most reliable presentation of the essential data is in Hunter, M., The Royal Society and its Fellows 1660–1700. The Morphology of an early scientific institution (British Society for the History of Science, no. 4, Chalfont St. Giles, 1982; corrected edn. 1985)Google Scholar. The author wisely adopts a classification of the early fellows by status and occupation, rather than by ideology.

47 Redwood, J., Reason, Ridicule and Religion: The Age of Enlightenment in England 1660–1750 (1976)Google Scholar. See also Wootton, D., ‘Lucien Febvre and the Problem of Unbelief in the Early Modern Period’, Jnl. of Mod. Hist., lx (12 1988); I am grateful to Dr Wootton for letting me read this before publicationGoogle Scholar.

48 There is a voluminous bibliography, Digby having attracted numerous biographies; the most recent scholarly study is Foster, M., ‘Sir Kenelm Digby (1603–65): as man of religion and thinker’, Parts I & II, The Downside Review, (01 & 04 1988), pp. 35–38, 101–25Google Scholar.

49 Among relatively recent studies see Bradley, R. J., SJ, ‘Blacklo and the Counter-Reformation…’, in Carter, C. H. (ed.), From the Renaissance to the Counter-Reformation (N.Y., 1965; London, 1966), pp. 348–70Google Scholar; Jones, H. W., (ed. & transl.), Hobbes, Thomas, Thomas White's De Mundo Examined (Bradford, 1972)Google Scholar; T. A. Birrell (ed.), R. Pugh, Blacklo's Cabal 1680 (Farnborough, 1970); Jones, H. W., ‘Thomas White (or Blacklo), 1593–1676; New Data’, Notes & Queries, 218, new ser. XX (1973), 381–8Google Scholar; South-gate, B. C., ‘”That Damned Booke”: The Grounds of Obedience and Government (1655), and the downfall of Thomas White’, Recusant History, xvii (1985), 238–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Wright, A. D., The Counter-Reformation… (1982), chs. 5 & 8, or via the indexGoogle Scholar; Lynch, J., ‘Philip II and the Papacy’, T.R.H.S., 5th ser. xi (1961), 23–42Google Scholar; among earlier works, see Orcibal, J., Louis XIVcontre Innocent XI… (Paris, 1949)Google Scholar.

51 Besides the numerous editions of his works, older biographies and critical studies, see in particular Wallace, J. M., Destiny His Choice: The Loyalism of Andrew Marvell (Cambridge, 1968)Google Scholar; Smith, D. I. B. (ed.), Marvell, Andrew, The Rehearsal Transpros'd and The Rehearsal Transpros'd The Second Part (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar; Patterson, A. M., Marvell and the Civic Crown (Princeton, 1978)Google Scholar; Kelliher, H. (comp.), Andrew Marvell Poet and Politician 1621–78 An Exhibition to commemmorate the tercentenary of his death (British Library Reference Division, 1978)Google Scholar; in addition I am most grateful to Professor Caroline Robbins for copies of articles and other help, back in the 1970s. I hope that my having been an undergraduate pupil of Dr Christopher Hill and a colleague of the late C. A. Patrides may almost qualify me as an honorary Marvellian.