Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T03:36:57.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reciprocity of Temporary and Permanent Workers: an Exploratory Study in an Industrial Company

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Silvia Lopes  and
Maria José Chambel
Silvia Lopes
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Maria José Chambel*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Maria José Chambel. Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa. Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa (Portugal). E-mail: mjchambel@netvisao.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The increasing use of temporary work prompts the need to understand to what degree workers with this type of contract differ from permanent workers as to the relationship they establish with the organization they work for. This study used a sample of temporary workers (N = 78) and permanent workers (N = 196) within the same company of electronics in Portugal. The results show that, regardless of the type of contract, the perception of human resource practices was related to the perception of psychological contract fulfillment by the company. Additionally and according to the norm of reciprocity, we verified that when workers thought the company was fulfilling its obligations they responded favorably showing more affective commitment towards the company. However, we found differences between these two groups of workers: for the permanent performance appraisal, training and rewards were human resources practices that were significantly related to psychological contract fulfillment, while for the temporary ones there weren't any specific practices that had a significant relationship with that variable. The practical implications of these findings for the management of temporary workers are discussed.

El uso creciente de trabajo temporal hace que surja la necesidad de comprender en qué medida los trabajadores con este tipo de contrato difieren de los trabajadores con contratos permanentes en cuanto a la relación que establecen con la organización para la que trabajan. Este estudio utilizó una muestra de trabajadores temporales (N = 78) y otra de trabajadores permanentes (N = 196) de la misma empresa de electrónica en Portugal. Los resultados muestran que, independientemente del tipo de contrato, la percepción de las prácticas de recursos humanos se relaciona con la percepción de cumplimiento del contrato psicológico por parte de la empresa. Adicionalmente y de acuerdo con la norma de reciprocidad, se comprobó que cuando los trabajadores pensaban que la compañía estaba cumpliendo con sus obligaciones, respondieron favorablemente mostrando un mayor compromiso afectivo con la empresa. Sin embargo, encontramos diferencias entre estos dos grupos de trabajadores: para los permanentes, las prácticas de recursos humanos que se relacionaron significativamente con el cumplimiento del contrato psicológico son la evaluación del desempeño, la formación, y las recompensas; mientras que para los temporales hubo prácticas específicas significativas en relación con esta variable. Se discuten las implicaciones prácticas de estos hallazgos para la gestión de los trabajadores temporales.

Keywords

temporary workershuman resources practicespsychological contractaffective commitmenttrabajadores temporalesprácticas de recursos humanoscontrato psicológicocompromiso afectivo
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 1163 - 1176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, U., & Bhargava, S. (2009). Reviewing the relationship between human resource practices and psychological contract and their impact on employee attitude and behaviours: A conceptual model. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33, 4–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090590910924351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aselage, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2003). Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: A theoretical integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 491–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bal, P. M., Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G., & Velde, M. E. (2008). Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 143–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barringer, M. W., & Sturman, M. C. (1998). The effects of variable work arrangements on the organizational commitment of contingent workers. Working paper. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. (1990). Fit indexes, lagrange multipliers, constraint changes and incomplete data in structural models. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 163–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buonocore, F. (2010). Contingent work in the hospitality industry: A mediating model of organizational attitudes. Tourism Management, 31, 378–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantisano, G. T., Domínguez, J. F. M., & Depolo, M. (2008). Psychological contract breach and outcomes: Combining meta-analysis and structural models. Psicothema, 20, 487–496.Google Scholar
Chambel, M. J. (2010). Interim report of the project “Relação de emprego nos trabalhadores temporários: As implicações da gestão de recursos humanos“ [Employment relations in temporary workers: The implications of human resource management]. Lisboa, Portugal: Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Chambel, M. J., & Alcover, C-M. (2011). The psychological contract of call-centre workers: Employment conditions, satisfaction and civic virtue behaviors. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32, 115–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143831X10376421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. (2007). They don't want to be temporaries: Similarities between temps and core workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 943–959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambel, M. J., & Sobral, F. (2011). Training is an investment with return in temporary workers: A social exchange perspective. Career Development International, 16, 161–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13620431111115613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, S-C., & Chen, S-C. (2007). Perceived psychological contract fulfillment and job attitudes among repatriates: An empirical study in Taiwan. International Journal of Manpower, 28, 474–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437720710820008Google Scholar
CIETT (International Confederation of Private Employment Agencies) (2010). The agency work industry around the world. Brussels, Belgium: CIETT (International Confederation of Private Employment Agencies).Google Scholar
Claes, R. (2005). Organization promises in the triangular psychological contract as perceived by temporary agency workers, agencies, and client organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17, 131–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-6937-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohany, S. R. (1996). Workers in alternative employment arrangements. Monthly Labor Review, 119, 31–45.Google Scholar
Connelly, C. E., & Gallagher, D. G. (2004). Emerging trends in contingent work research. Journal of Management, 30, 959–983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2002). Contingent and non-contingent working in local government: Contrasting psychological contracts. Public Administration, 80, 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cuyper, N., Jong, J., De Witte, H., Isaksson, K., Rigotti, T., & Schalk, R. (2008). Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 25–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00221.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2005). Job insecurity: Mediator or moderator of the relationship between type of contract and various outcomes? Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31, 79–86.Google Scholar
De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2007). Job insecurity in temporary versus permanent workers: Associations with attitudes, well-being, and behavior. Work & Stress, 21, 65–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678370701229050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2008). Volition and reasons for accepting temporary employment:Associations with attitudes, well-being, and behavioral intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 363–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320701810373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N. T., & Rauter, K. A. (2004). Organizational citizenship behaviors in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 81–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, D. A. (2004). Temporary workers: Managing the problem of unscheduled turnover. Management Decision, 42, 963–973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740410555452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, D. G., & Connelly, C. E. (2008). Nonstandard work arrangements: Meaning, evidence, and theoretical perspectives. In Barling, J. & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 621–640). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Social Review, 25, 161–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracia, F. J., Silla, I., Peiró, J. M., & Fortes-Ferreira, L. (2006). El estado del contrato psicológico y su relación con la salud psicológica de los empleados [The state of psychological contract and it relationship with employees' psychological health]. Psicothema, 18, 256–262.Google Scholar
Guest, D. E. (1998). Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 649–664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(1998)19:1+<649::AID-JOB970>3.0.CO;2-T3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, D. E. (2004a). Flexible employment contracts, the psychological contract and employee outcomes: An analysis and review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6, 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00094.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, D. E. (2004b). The psychology of the employment relationship:An analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 541–555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00187.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, D. E., & Conway, N. (2002). Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 12, 22–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2002.tb00062.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzo, R. A., & Noonan, K. A. (1994). Human Resource Practices as communications and the psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33, 447–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, D., & Iverson, R. (2004). Employment relationships in context: Implications for policy and practice. In Coyle-Shapiro, J., Shore, L., Taylor, S., & Tetrick, L. (Eds.), The Employment Relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives (pp. 322–350). Oxford, UK: University Press.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling, concepts, issues, and applications (pp.1–15). Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Purcell, J., Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2005). Satisfaction with HR practices and commitment to the Organisation: Why one size does not fit all. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(4), 9–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00293.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, S. W., & Kickul, J. (2001). Psychological contracts in the 21st Century: What employees value most and how well organizations are responding to these expectations. Human Resource Planning, 24, 10–21.Google Scholar
Lester, S. W., Turnley, W. H., Bloodgood, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (2002). Not seeing eye to eye: Differences in supervision and subordinate perceptions of and attributions for psychological contract breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 39–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resources Management Review, 1, 61–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78, 538–551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.78.4.538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Smith, C. A. (2000). HRM practices and organizational commitment: Test of a mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17, 319–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2000.tb00231.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9707180265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parzefall, M-R. (2007). Psychological contracts and reciprocity: A study in a Finnish context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1703–1719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190802295272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. L. (1993). Toward an organizational behavior of contract laborers: Their psychological involvement and effects on employee co-workers. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1082–1096. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polivka, A. E. (1996). A profile of contingent workers. Monthly Labor Review, 10–21.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations. Understanding written and unwritten agreements. London, England: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological Contract Inventory Technical Report. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., & Greller, M. M. (1994). Human resource practices: Administrative contract makers. Human Resource Management, 33, 385–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1994). Linking strategy and human resource practices: How employee and customer contracts are created. Human Resource Management, 33, 463–489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalk, R., & Roe, R. E. (2007). Towards a dynamic model of the psychological contract. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37, 167–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00330.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeenk, S. G. A., Eisinga, R. N., Teelken, J. C., & Doorewaard, J. A. (2007). The effects of HRM practices and antecedents on organizational commitment among university employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 2035–2054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190600965449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Wang, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2007). An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1069–1083. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1069CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29, 187–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00214-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (1999). The impact of psychological contract violation on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Human Relations, 52, 895–922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dyne, L., & Ang., S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 692–703. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., & Iverson, R. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 77–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar