Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Convergence of Internal and External Structure for the California Child Q-set

  • David Bimler (a1), John Kirkland (a1), Hiram E. Fitzgerald (a2) and Robert A. Zucker (a3)

Abstract

The language of personality traits includes single-word trait descriptors, and longer phrases or sentences. Evidence has accumulated that abstract, semantic relationships among single words have the same underlying structure as the empirical relationships when words are applied to individuals. The present study examines whether these two kinds of structure are also isomorphic for longer trait descriptors. Empirical descriptions and judgements of semantic similarity were collected among the descriptors comprising the California Child Q-set, or CCQ, and analysed with multidimensional scaling. Canonical correlation showed the solutions to be closely related to one another, and to independent sets of ratings available for the CCQ items. Informants' similarity judgements were not affected by the context in which they were made. The dominant dimensions of the solutions reproduce dimensions found previously for the single-word personality lexicon, indicating the two trait-descriptive languages to be closely parallel.

El lenguaje de rasgos de personalidad incluye a descriptores de rasgo de una sola palabra y frases u oraciones más largos. Hay evidencia acumulada de que las relaciones semánticas abstractas entre estas palabras tienen la misma estructura subyacente que las relaciones empíricas cuando las palabras aisladas se aplican a individuos. Este estudio explora si estas dos clases de estructuras son también isomorfas para descriptores de rasgo más largos. Se registraron las descripciones y los juicios empíricos de similitud semántica de los descriptores incluidos en el California Child Q-set (CCQ) y se analizaron con escalamiento multidimensional. La correlación canónica mostró que ambas soluciones  están estrechamente relacionadas entre sí y con conjuntos independientes de puntuaciones disponibles para los ítems del CCQ. Los juicios de similitud de los informantes no estuvieron afectados por el contexto en el que fueron hechos. Las dimensiones dominantes de las soluciones reproducen otras dimensiones encontradas previamente en el léxico de personalidad de palabras únicas, indicando que los dos lenguajes de descripción de rasgos son cercanamente paralelos.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to David Bimler. School of Arts. Development and Health Education. MUCE. Massey University. Private Bag 11-222. Palmerston North. (New Zealand). E-mail: d.bimler@massey.ac.nz

Footnotes

Hide All
*John Kirkland is currently at Royal University for Women, Bahrain.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bimler, D.L.& Kirkland, J. (2007). Constructing personality maps, mapping personality constructs: Multidimensional scaling recovers the ‘Big Five’ factors from internal and external structure. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 6881.
Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychological research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas (reprinted 1978, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press).
Block, J.& Block, J.H. (1980). The California Child Q-set. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Briggs, S.R. (1992). Assessing the five-factor model of personality description. Journal of Personality, 60, 253293.
Caspi, A., Block, J., Block, J.H., Klopp, B., Lynam, D., Moffitt, T.E.& Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1992). A “common-language” version of the California Child Q-set for personality assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 512523.
Cattell, R.B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormaland Social Psychology, 38, 476507.
Church, A.T.& Katigbak, M.S. (1989). Internal, external, and self-report structure of personality in a non-Western culture: An investigation of cross-language and cross-cultural generalizability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 857872.
Dabady, M., Bell, M.& Kihlstrom, J. F. (1999). Person memory: organization of behaviors by traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 369377.
Fitzgerald, H.E., Zucker, R.A.& Yang, H.-Y. (1995). Developmental systems theory and alcoholism: Analyzing patterns of variation in high-risk families. Journal of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 822.
Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 2642.
Goodhill, G.J., Simmen, M.W.& Willshaw, D.J. (1995). An evaluation of the use of multidimensional scaling for understanding brain connectivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 348, 265280.
Green, D.E.& Walkey, F.H. (1980). A nonmetric analysis of Eysenck's Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Analysis, 15, 157163.
Gurtman, M.B.& Pincus, A.L. (2000). Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 374384.
Guttman, L. (1966). Order analysis of correlation matrices. In Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology (ed. Cattell, R.B.), 438458. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Hofstee, W.K.B., de Raad, B.& Goldberg, L.R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146163.
John, O.P., Caspi, A., Robins, R.W., Moffitt, T.E.& Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). The “little five”: Exploring the nomological network of the five-factor model of personality in adolescent boys. Child Development, 65, 160178.
Johnson, J.A, & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Clarification of the Five-Factor Model with the Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 563576.
Kogan, N.& Block, J. (1991). Independence from early childhood through adolescence: Personality and socialization aspects. In Field Dependence-Independence: Cognitive style across the life span (eds. Wapner, S. & Demick, J.), pp. 177207. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lanning, K. (1994). Dimensionality of observer ratings on the California Adult Q-set. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 151160.
Lorr, M. (1978). The structure of the California Q-set. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 387393.
Maraun, M.D. (1997). Appearance and reality: Is the Big Five the structure of trait descriptors? Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 629647.
McCrae, R.R.& Costa, P.T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 8190.
McCrae, R.R.& Costa, P.T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 1740.
McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.& Busch, C.M. (1986). Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q-set and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 54, 430446.
Osgood, C.E. (1971). Explorations in semantic space: A personal diary. Journal of Social Issues, 27, 564.
Peabody, D.& Goldberg, L.R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552567.
Schlesinger, I.M.& Guttman, L. (1969). Smallest space analysis of intelligence and achievement tests. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 95100.
Sherman, R.C. (1972). Individual differences in perceived trait relationships as a function of dimensional salience. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 7, 109129.
Sneed, C.D., McCrae, R. R.& Funder, D.C. (1998). Lay conceptions of the five-factor model and its indicators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 115126.
van Lieshout, C.F.M.& Haselager, G.J.T. (1994). The Big Five personality factors in Q-sort descriptions of children and adolescents. In: Halverson, C.F., Kohnstamm, G.A. and Martin, R.P. (eds.), The Developing Structure of Temperament and Personality (pp. 293318). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vaughn, B.E.& Martino, D.G. (1988). Q-sort correlates of visual regard in groups of young pre-school children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 589594.
Waters, E., Garber, J., Gornal, M.& Vaughn, B.E. (1983). Q-sort correlates of visual regard among preschool peers: Validation of a behavioral index of social competence. Developmental Psychology, 19, 550560.
Waters, E., Noyes, D.M., Vaughn, B.E.& Ricks, M. (1985). Q-sort definitions of social competence and self-esteem: Discriminant validity of related constructs in theory and data. Developmental Psychology, 21, 508522.
Wiggins, J.S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Zucker, R.A., Fitzgerald, H.E., Refior, S.K., Puttler, L.I., Pallas, D.M.& Ellis, D.A. (2000). The clinical and social ecology of childhood for children of alcoholics: Description of a study and implications for a differentiated social policy. In: Fitzgerald, H.E., Lester, B.M., & Zuckerman, B.S. (eds.), Children of addiction: Research, health and policy issues (pp. 109141). New York: Routledge/Falmer.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed