Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Intersections and Multiple ‘Candidacies’: Exploring Connections between Two Theoretical Perspectives on Domestic Abuse and Their Implications for Practicing Policy

  • Mhairi Mackenzie (a1), Ellie Conway (a2), Annette Hastings (a3), Moira Munro (a4) and Catherine A. O’Donnell (a5)...

Abstract

Domestic abuse policy increasingly uses language which indicates that abuse is patterned according to structural factors. However, practicing according to these structural accounts of abuse is problematic because of the policy and organisational contexts that practitioners work within and, we argue, because the implications of the structured nature of victims’ experiences is not fully understood by all practitioners.

We ask whether women's differential use and experiences of services with a remit to address abuse can be illuminated using two theoretical perspectives – ‘candidacy’ and intersectionality. We report the findings of a literature synthesis that investigates how these improve our understanding of women's help-seeking and service utilisation and of the responses that they receive. Both concepts were highly congruent with the literature and we conclude that, together, candidacy and intersectionality offer a means of enhancing knowledge of how the political becomes enacted in the personal. Embedding such knowledge within practice repertoires offers the potential to develop more nuanced structural understandings of women's experiences and constraints.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Baachus, L., Mezey, G. and Bewley, S. (2002) ‘Women's perceptions and experiences of routine enquiry for domestic violence in a maternity service’, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 1, 916.
Browne, I. and Misra, J. (2003) ‘The intersection of gender and race in the labor market’, Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487513.
Burman, E. and Chantler, K. (2005) ‘Domestic violence and minoritisation: legal and policy barriers facing minoritized women leaving violent relationships’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 1, 5974.
Carlyle, K. E., Slater, M. D. and Chakroff, J. L. (2008) ‘Newspaper coverage of intimate partner violence: skewing representation of risk’, Journal of Communication, 58, 1, 168–86.
Cavanagh, K. (2003) ‘Understanding women's responses to domestic violence’, Qualitative Social Work, 2, 3, 229–49.
Cole, P. (2001) ‘Impoverished women in violent partnerships’, Violence against Women, 7, 2, 222–33.
Cramer, E. P. and Plummer, S. B. (2009) ‘People of color with disabilities: intersectionality as a framework for analyzing intimate partner violence in social, historical, and political contexts’, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 18, 2, 162–81.
Crenshaw, K. (1991) ‘Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color’, Stanford Law Review, 43, 6, 1241–99.
Davis, K. (2008) ‘Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful’, Feminist Theory, 9, 1, 6785.
Davis, L. V., Hagen, J. L. and Early, T. J. (1994) ‘Social services for battered women: are they adequate, accessible, and appropriate?’, Social Work, 36, 6, 695704.
Dixon-Woods, M., Kirk, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, T., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., Riley, R. and Sutton, A. (2005) Vulnerable Groups and Access to Health Care: A Critical Interpretive Review, London: National Coordinating Centre for the Service Delivery and Organisation (NCCSDO) Research Programme.
Dixon-Woods, M., Kirk, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., Riley, R. and Sutton, A. J. (2006) ‘Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 35.
Eastman, B. J. and Bunch, S. G. (2007) ‘Providing services to survivors of domestic violence’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 4, 465–73.
Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Public Policy, Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002) ‘Dilemmas and opportunities for an appropriate health-service response to violence against women’, Lancet, 359, 9316, 1509–14.
Grossman, S. F., Lundy, M., George, C. C. and Crabtree-Nelson, S. (2010) ‘Shelter and service receipt for victims of domestic violence in Illinois’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 11, 2077–93.
Hague, G. and Mullender, A. (2005) ‘Listening to women's voices: the participation of domestic violence survivors in services’, in Skinner, T., Hester, M. and Malos, E. (eds.), Researching Gender Violence, Feminist Methodology in Action, Devon: Willan Publishing, pp. 146–66.
Hamby, S. (2013) Battered Women's Protective Strategies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harwin, N. (2006) ‘Putting a stop to domestic violence in the United Kingdom: challenges and opportunities’, Violence Against Women, 12, 6, 556–67.
Hearn, J. and McKie, L. (2010) ‘Gendered and social hierarchies in problem representation processes: “domestic violence” in Finland and Scotland’, Violence Against Women, 16, 2, 136–58.
Humphreys, C. and Thiara, R. (2003a) ‘Mental health and domestic violence: ‘I call it symptoms of abuse’, British Journal of Social Work, 33, 2, 209–26.
Humphreys, C. and Thiara, R. (2003b) ‘Neither justice nor protection: women's experiences of post-separation violence’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 25, 3, 195214.
Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., Varone, F. and Hill, M. (2007) Public Policy Analysis, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Mackenzie, M., Conway, E., Hastings, A., Munro, M. and O’Donnell, C. (2013) ‘Is “candidacy” a useful concept for understanding journeys through public services? A critical interpretive literature synthesis’, Social Policy and Administration, 47, 7, 806–25.
McKie, L., Fennell, B. and Mildorf, J. (2002) ‘Time to disclose, timing disclosure: GPs' discourses on disclosing domestic abuse in primary care’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 24, 3, 327–46.
Mullender, A. (1996) Rethinking Domestic Violence, The Social Work and Probation Response, London: Routledge.
Mullender, A. and Hague, G. (2005) ‘Giving a voice to women survivors of domestic violence through recognition as a service user group’, British Journal of Social Work, 35, 8, 1321–41.
Nash, J. C. (2008) ‘Rethinking Intersectionality’, Feminist Review, 89, 1, 1–15.
Nixon, J. and Humphreys, C. (2010) ‘Marshalling the evidence: using intersectionality in the domestic violence frame’, Social Politics, 17, 2, 137–58.
O’Connor, M. (2002) ‘Consequences and outcomes of disclosure for abused women’, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 78, Suppl.1, S8389.
Payne, B. and Triplett, R. (2009) ‘Assessing the domestic violence training needs of benefits workers’, Journal of Family Violence, 24, 4, 243–53.
Peckover, S. (2003) ‘“I could have just done with a little more help”: an analysis of women's help-seeking from health visitors in the context of domestic violence’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 11, 3, 275–82.
Petersen, R., Kathryn, E., Moracco, K. E., Goldstein, K. M. and Clark, K. A. (2005) ‘Moving beyond disclosure: women's perspectives on barriers and motivators to seeking assistance for intimate partner violence’, Women and Health, 40, 3, 6376.
Price, S., Baird, K. and Salmon, D. (2007) ‘Does routine antenatal enquiry lead to an increased rate of disclosure of domestic abuse? Findings from the Bristol Pregnancy and Domestic Violence Programme’, Evidence Based Midwifery, 5, 3, 100–6.
Ramsay, J., Richardson, J., Carter, Y. H., Davidson, L. L. and Feder, G. (2002) ‘Should health professionals screen women for domestic violence? Systematic review’, British Medical Journal, 325, 314–18.
Sen, R. (1999) ‘Between a rock and a hard place: domestic violence in communities of color’, Colorlines, 2, 1.
Smye, V., Browne, A. J., Varcoe, C. and Josewski, V. (2011) ‘Harm reduction, methadone maintenance treatment and the root causes of health and social inequalities: an intersectional lens in the Canadian context’, Harm Reduction Journal, 8, 17.
Sokoloff, N. J. and Dupont, I. (2005) ‘Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender’, Violence Against Women, 11, 1, 3864.
Stark, E. (2007) Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Starmer, K. (2011) ‘Domestic violence: the facts, the issues, the future’, International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 25, 1–2, 915.
Ulbrich, P. M. and Stockdale, J. (2002) ‘Making family planning clinics an empowerment zone for rural battered women’, Women and Health, 35, 2, 83100.
Walby, S., Armstrong, J. and Strid, S. (2012) ‘Intersectionality: multiple inequalities in social theory’, Sociology, 46, 2, 224–40.
Weisz, A. N. (2005) ‘Reaching African American battered women: increasing the effectiveness of advocacy’, Journal of Family Violence, 20, 2, 91–9.
World Health Organisation. Violence against Women (n.d.) http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/en/ (accessed 5 February 2012).
Yuval-Davies, N. (2006) ‘Intersectionality and feminist politics’, European Journal of Women's Studies, 13, 3, 193209.
Zweig, J. M., Schlichter, K. A. and Burt, M. R. (2002) ‘Assisting women victims of violence who experience multiple barriers to services’, Violence Against Women, 8, 2, 162–80.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed