Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:30:11.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE SHAPE OF LOCKEAN RIGHTS: FAIRNESS, PARETO, MODERATION, AND CONSENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2005

Richard J. Arneson
Richard J. Arneson
Affiliation:
Philosophy, University of California at San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In chapter four of Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Robert Nozick raised interesting questions about whether or not it is ever morally acceptable to act against what are agreed to be an individual's natural moral rights. The pursuit of these questions opens up issues concerning the specific content of these individual rights. This essay explores Nozick's questions by posing examples and using our considered responses to them to specify the shape of individual rights. The exploration provisionally concludes that a conception of individual moral rights quite different from Nozick's looks attractive and merits further development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Philosophy and Policy , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 255 - 285
Copyright
© 2005 Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Ellen Frankel Paul for helpful, constructive, and substantive comments on a prior draft of this essay. It goes without saying that her comments outstripped my ability to respond.