Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:41:30.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Coherence of Plato's Philosophers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2018

Abstract

Because Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues is such a monumental book, understanding its own coherence is a daunting task. The dialogue Theaetetus has as its theme the problem of knowledge, and so the part of Plato's Philosophers that deals with the Theaetetus seems a promising place to begin to think through what Zuckert's book means to be as a whole. In the Theaetetus we learn how knowledge, as a story that must begin and unfold for us in time, while necessarily partial, provides indirect, if imperfect, access to the whole and leads to a kind of self- knowledge. Plato makes this self-knowledge, the true goal of philosophy, most fully manifest in the drama of the life of his philosopher, Socrates, to which Plato's Philosophers, in meticulously tracing the dramatic order of the dialogues, means to provide access.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Plato, Letter II 322c6–d6.

2 Zuckert, Catherine and Zuckert, Michael, The Truth about Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zuckert, Michael P. and Zuckert, Catherine H., Leo Strauss and the Problem of Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Strauss, Leo, “How to Begin to Study Medieval Philosophy,” in The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, ed. Pangle, Thomas L. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 207–12Google Scholar.

4 Consider, for example, Strauss, Leo, The City and Man (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), 5063Google Scholar.

5 With only a few exceptions, for example, this is true of Strauss's accounts of the Euthyphro (in Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism, 187–206) and of the Laws (Strauss, Leo, The Argument and the Action of Plato's “Laws” [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975]Google Scholar).

6 See, for example, the introduction to City and Man, 1–12; Strauss, Leo, “What Is Political Philosophy?,” in What Is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies (New York: Free Press, 1959)Google Scholar; and Strauss, Leo, “Jerusalem and Athens: Some Preliminary Reflections,” in Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy, ed. Pangle, Thomas L. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), 147–73Google Scholar.

7 Zuckert, Catherine H., Natural Right and the American Imagination: Political Philosophy in Novel Form (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1990)Google Scholar.

8 All parenthetical page references are to Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

9 Zuckert, Catherine H., Postmodern Platos: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Gadamer, Strauss, Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996)Google Scholar.