^{page 21 note 1} London (1966).

^{page 22 note 1} London, pp. 279–80.

^{page 22 note 2} De Carni Christi, v.

^{page 23 note 1} There is a useful collection of Aquinas' texts on analogy at the end of Palmer's, H.Analogy (London, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar see also Ferré, F., Logic, Language and God (London, 1962), chap. VI.Google Scholar

^{page 24 note 1} The Existence of God, pp. 52, 279.Google Scholar

^{page 27 note 1} Bonhoeffer, D., Letters and Papers from Prison.Google Scholar

^{page 29 note 1} See my A Philosophical Approach to Religion (London, 1974), pp. 14–16.

^{page 29 note 2} Cf further on this in my ‘What makes religous beliefs religious?’, Religious Studies XIII (1977).

^{page 30 note 1} ‘Empiricism, semantics and ontology’, in Revue Internationale de Philosophie (Bruxelles, 1950).

^{page 30 note 2} On Certainty, 315.

^{page 31 note 1} Op. cit. 103.

^{page 31 note 2} Op. cit. 310–17.

^{page 31 note 3} Op. cit. 23.

^{page 32 note 1} See The Concept of Mind (London, 1949) and Dilemmas, (Cambridge, 1960).

^{page 32 note 2} Principia Ethica (Cambridge, 1903), chapter 1.

^{page 32 note 3} See his ‘A defence of common sense’ (1925) in Moore, G. E., Philosophical Papers (London, 1959).Google Scholar

^{page 33 note 1} ‘Metaphysics and common sense’ in his collection of papers with the same title (London, 1969), p. 72.

^{page 33 note 2} The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London, 1959), p. 280.

^{page 33 note 3} Cf. On Certainty, 145.

^{page 33 note 4} See his I and Thou (Berlin, 1933; Edinburgh, 1970).

^{page 35 note 1} Op. cit. 559.

^{page 36 note 1} Op. cit. 102.

^{page 36 note 2} Op. cit. 97.

^{page 36 note 3} Op. cit. 410.