Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T12:22:06.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Saintliness And Moral Perfection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

James R. Horne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the course of supporting his larger thesis about mysticism, Steven Katz argues that, ‘Every religious community and every mystical movement within each community has a “model” or “models” of the ideal practitioner of the religious life.' Among thirteen functions of such models he mentions three that partially overlap. He says that (i) these model lives set standards of perfection to measure believers' actions, (ii) they are perfect examples of what it is to be a human being, and (iii) they are moral paradigms. Katz mentions various saints, sages, and other exemplary figures, and sums up with the claim that in the Christian tradition the function of ‘ models’ is expressed in Thomas à Kempis' The Imitation of Christ. Taking all of this together, one could conclude that he intends to say that every religious tradition contains accounts of morally perfect persons who are examples to be imitated.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 463 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Katz, Steven T., ‘The “Conservative” Character of Mysticism’, in Mysticism and Religious traditions, ed. by Katz, Steven T. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), p. 43.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. p. 44.

3 Ibid. p. 45.

4 Wolf, Susan, ‘Moral Saints’, in Moral Philosophy: Selected Readings, ed. by Sher, George (Toronto: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, 1987), p. 35.Google Scholar

5 Adams, Robert M., ‘Saints’, in The Virtue of Faith (New York: Oxford University press, 1987), p. 164.Google Scholar

6 Hume, David, An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. by Hendel, Charles W. (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1957), p. 91.Google Scholar

7 Wolf, ‘Moral Saints’, p. 42.Google Scholar

8 Ibid. p. 43.

9 Ibid. p. 44.

10 Ibid. p. 45.

11 Adams, ‘Saints’, p. 171.Google Scholar

12 Urmson, J. O., ‘Saints and Heroes’, in Essays in Moral Philosophy, ed. by Melden, A. I. (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958), p. 203.Google Scholar

13 Ibid. pp. 214–15.

14 Ibid. pp. 215–16.

15 Ibid. p. 205.

16 Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics 1109b.30–1111b.3, trans, by Ross, W. D., The basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by McKeon, Richard (New York: Random House, 1941), pp. 964–7.Google Scholar

17 Hare, R. M., Moral Thinking (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981), p. 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Fyodor Dostoevsky, letter to friend and poet Maykov, quoted in the Translator's Introduction to The Idiot, trans, by Magarshack, David (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1955), p. 9.Google Scholar

19 Krieger, Murrayn, ‘ Dostoevsky's “Idiot”: The Curse of Saintliness’, in Doestoevsky, ed. by Welleck, Rene (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1962), p. 47.Google Scholar

20 Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, 11453.25, in Basic Works, p. 1037.Google Scholar

21 Adams, ‘Saints’, p. 168.Google Scholar

22 Ibid. p. 170.

23 Tillich, Paul, Systematic Theology, vol. 1 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951), p. 121.Google Scholar

24 Buber, Martin, I and Thou, trans, by Kaufmann, Walter (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1970), P. 134.Google Scholar

25 Tillich, Paul, Systematic Theology, vol. III (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963), p. 211.Google Scholar

26 Tillich, , Systematic Theology, III, p. 211.Google Scholar

27 Buber, I and Thou, p. 134.Google Scholar

28 Maclntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, 2nd edn (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984), p. 218.Google Scholar

29 Tillich, Systematic Theology, in, p. 211.Google Scholar