Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T08:31:59.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Morality of Sins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

David G. Attfield
Affiliation:
Hull, England

Extract

Once upon a time, at an examination for Fellowships at All Souls, there was a three-hour essay paper. When the eager candidates turned over their question-papers, on the reverse they found a blank expanse of whiteness with one little word in the centre for them to write about: the word was ‘SIN’.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 227 note 1 The Concept of Sin (Cambridge, 1912), chs. III–VI.

page 228 note 1 Strawson, P. F., Social Morality and Individual Ideal. In Christian Ethics and Contemporary Philosophy, ed. Ramsey, I. T. (London, 1966), ch. 15.Google Scholar

page 229 note 1 It is in this sense that Matthew 5:28 is defensible.

page 230 note 1 Jonah I: 1–3.

page 230 note 2 Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals (Oxford, 1952), 11.5.Google ScholarFreedom and Reason (Oxford, 1963), Chs. 2, 3, 6, 10 and 11.

page 231 note 1 Ethics and Christianity (London, 1970), Ch. IX.

page 232 note 1 The Object of Morality (London, 1971), Chs. 2 and 3.

page 233 note 1 Nicomachean Ethics, vii. i if.

page 234 note 1 Ibid.

page 234 note 2 ‘insincere’ op.cit. (1952), pp. 19–20, 169; (1963), pp. 79, 83; also Moral Thinking (1981), p. 185; ‘amoral’ op.cit. (1981), pp. 183–7.

page 237 note 1 Kirk, K. E., The Vision of God (1931), pp. 540–4;Google ScholarSome Principles of Moral Theology (1920), ch. XI.