Article contents
Inclusion and Incarnation: a reply to Sturch
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 April 2003
Abstract
I make three points in response to Richard Sturch's comments on my paper: I defend my interpretation of the Morris–Swinburne (M–S) account of the Incarnation; I argue that the M–S model appears to undercut the view that the unity of consciousness can be explained in terms of the self; and third, I argue that M–S model seems to entail that God has false beliefs.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2003 Cambridge University Press
- 1
- Cited by