Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T08:09:43.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How is the Concept of Sin related to the Concept of Moral Wrongdoing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Ingolf Dalferth
Affiliation:
University of Tubingen

Extract

Professor Mitchell's strategy for answering the question before us appears to be straightforward. Part, at least, of saying that the concepts of sin and moral wrongdoing belong to different vocabularies is that they are intensionally different. But this does not exclude their being related. Taken as concepts in extension there appear to be five possible relations between sin (S) and moral wrongdoing (M) not all of which Mitchell considers:

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brunner, E., Man in Revolt (London, 1939).Google Scholar
Dalferth, I. U., Religiöse Rede von Gott (München, 1981).Google Scholar
Fischer, J., Anrede als Handlung. Skizze zu einer handlungstheoretischen Rekonstruktion der logischen Strucktur christlicher Ethik, theol. Diss. Tübingen (1982).Google Scholar
Hebblethwaite, B., The Adequacy of Christian Ethics (London, 1981).Google Scholar
Heyd, D., Supererogation. Its Status in Ethical Theory (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Lorenzen, P., Logik, und Grammatik, , Methodisches Denken, (Frankfurt, 1974), pp. 7080.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B., Morality: Religious and Secular. The Dilemma of the Traditional Conscience, (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
Quinn, Ph. L., Divine Commands and Moral Requirements, (Oxford, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B., Human Society in Ethics and Politics, (London, 1954; 41971)Google Scholar