Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T18:00:42.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fusions de communes et redistribution du revenu : quelques aspects du problème

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

B.J. Jurion
B.J. Jurion*
Affiliation:
Université de Liège
Get access

Extract

Au terme d’une loi que vient de voter le Parlement, un nombre appréciable de communes seront rayées définitivement de la carte de Belgique le ler janvier 1977, fusionnées qu’elles seront alors avec une ou plusieurs communes voisines. I1 faut remarquer, à ce propos, qu’au recensement de 1970, on comptait dans le pays, sur 2379 communes, 479 communes de moins de 500 habitants et 952 communes de moins de 1.000 habitants. Pour prendre deux exemples particulièrement frappants de la manière dont le territoire est fragmenté en un nombre important de petites communes très peu peuplées, intéressons-nous, un instant, au cas des provinces de Namur et du Luxembourg. Dans la première, sur 345 communes, 259 ont moins de 1.000 habitants, tandis que sur les 229 que compte la seconde, on en relève 174 de moins de 1.000 habitants. Souvent, pour justifier le processus de fusion, on a mis en évidence les économies d’échelle qu’il serait possible de réaliser.

Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1975 , pp. 363 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Bedard, (D.): «Le problème des effets de débordement et des subventions conditionnelles», Acrualité Economique, 1967, pp.415à441.Google Scholar
Boskin, (M.J.): «Local Government Tax and Product Competition and the Optimal Provision of Public Goods», Journal of Political Economy, 1973, pp.203à210.10.1086/260017Google Scholar
Brainard, (W.C.) et Dolbear, (F.T.): «The Possibility of Oversupply of Local « Public » Goods : A Critical Note», Journal of Political Economy, 1967, pp.86à90.10.1086/259241Google Scholar
Breton, (A.): «Public Goods and the Stability of Federalism», Kyklos, 1970, pp.882à902.10.1111/j.1467-6435.1970.tb01050.xGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, (J.M.): «Federalism and Fiscal Equity», American Economic Review, 1950, pp.583à599.Google Scholar
Buchanan, (J.M.) et Strubblebine, (W.C.): «Externality», Economica, 1962, pp.371à384.10.2307/2551386Google Scholar
Buchanan, (J.M.) et Zafoglis, (M.Z.): «A Note On Public Goods Supply», American Economic Review, 1963, pp.403à413.Google Scholar
Buchanan, (J.M.): «An Economic Theory of Clubs», Economica, 1965, pp.1à14.10.2307/2552442Google Scholar
Buchanan, (J.M.)): «The Demand and Supply of Public Goods», Chicago, Rand McNally and Co., 214pages.Google Scholar
Hirsch, (W.Z.): «Urban Economic Analysis», 1973, London, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 450pages.Google Scholar
Litvack, (J.M.) et Oates, (W.E.): «Group Size and the Output of Publlc Goods Theory and an Application to State-Local Finance in the United-States», Public Finance, 1970, pp.42à57.Google Scholar
Musgrave, (R.A.): «The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy», 1959, London, Mac Graw-Hill Book Co., 628pages.Google Scholar
Musgrave, (R.A.): «Theories of Fiscal Federalism», Public Finance, 1969, pp.521à532.Google Scholar
Oates, (W.E.): «The Theory of Public Finance in a Federal System», Canadian Journal of Economics, 1968, pp.37à54.10.2307/133460Google Scholar
Oates, (W.E.): «Fiscal Federalism», 1972, New York. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 256pages.Google Scholar
Olson, (M.) et. Zeckhauser, (R.) «An Economic Theory of Alliances», Review, of Economics und Statistic, 1966, pp.266à279 10.2307/1927082Google Scholar
Pauly, (M.V.) «Optimality « Public » Goods and Local Governments a General Theoretical Analys», Journal of Political Economy, 1970, pp572à585.10.1086/259651Google Scholar
Rothenberg, (J.): «Local Decentralization and the Theory of optimal Government», in Margolis, (J.) Edit., «The Analysis of Public Output», National Bureau of Economic Research, 1970, pp.31à68.Google Scholar
Samuelson, (P.A.): «The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure», Review of Economics and Statistics, 1954, pp.387à389.10.2307/1925895Google Scholar
Samuelson, (P.A.): «A Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure», Review of Economics and Statisrics, 1956, pp.350à356.Google Scholar
Samuelson, (P.A.): «Aspect of Public Expenditure Theories», Review of Economics and Statisrics, 1958, pp.332à338.10.2307/1926336Google Scholar
Sandler, (T.M.) et. Shelton, (R.B.): «Fiscal Federalism, Spillovers, and the Export of Taxes», Kyklos, 1972, pp.736à753.10.1111/j.1467-6435.1972.tb01079.xGoogle Scholar
Sandler, (G.): «Economie des Services Collectifs et de la Dépense Publique» Paris, Dunod, 1971 402page.Google Scholar
Tiebout, (C.M.): «An Economic Theory of Fiscal Decentralization», in «Public Finances : Needs, Sources and Utilization», National Bureau of Economic Research, 1961, pp.79à96.Google Scholar
Williams, (A.): «The Optimal Provision of Public Goods in a System of Local Governments», Journal of Political Economy, 1966, pp.18à33.10.1086/259106Google Scholar