Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:24:50.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultra-processed foods consumption and diet quality among preschool children and women of reproductive age from Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2022

María Elisa Zapata*
Affiliation:
Center of Studies in Child Nutrition Dr. Alejandro O´Donnell (CESNI), Cerrito 1136 1° Floor, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, 1010, Argentina
Gustavo Cediel
Affiliation:
University of Antioquia, School of Nutrition and Dietetics, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Ezequiel Arrieta
Affiliation:
Multidisciplinary Institute of Plant Biology (IMBIV), CONICET and National University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Argentina
Alicia Rovirosa
Affiliation:
Center of Studies in Child Nutrition Dr. Alejandro O´Donnell (CESNI), Cerrito 1136 1° Floor, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, 1010, Argentina
Esteban Carmuega
Affiliation:
Center of Studies in Child Nutrition Dr. Alejandro O´Donnell (CESNI), Cerrito 1136 1° Floor, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, 1010, Argentina
Carlos A Monteiro
Affiliation:
Center for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Email mezapata@cesni.org.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the association between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) and diet quality among preschool children and women of reproductive age from Argentina.

Design:

Cross-sectional and nationally representative survey. The food items were classified according to the NOVA system. Consumption of fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds and wholegrains was estimated, and the energy and nutrients related to non-communicable disease (NCD) intake. Linear regression was used to assess the associations.

Setting:

Argentina.

Participants:

Children aged 2–5 years (n 7022), female adolescent aged 10–19 years (n 2165) and women aged 20–49 years (n 4414).

Results:

UPF represented more than a quarter of total energy intake, 27 % in children, 31 % in female adolescents and 26 % in women. Across all age groups, the major contributors to UPF consumption were cookies and pastries (about 6·0–7·0 %), soft drinks (about 2·7–3·7 %), candies (about 1·8–4·6 %), and juices (about 1·3–1·7 %). The consumption of fresh vegetables, fresh fruits and legumes was negatively associated with UPF consumption. A significant positive association was found between the dietary share of UPF and the dietary content of NCD-promoting nutrients such as free sugars and total saturated and trans-fats. In contrast, a significant negative association was found with the content of NCD-protective such as fibre and protein.

Conclusions:

UPF were associated with lower consumption of healthy foods and higher intake of nutrients related to NCD in children and women of reproductive age in Argentina. It is necessary to design food policies that simultaneously reduce the consumption of UPF while promoting the intake of fresh and whole foods to improve the dietary quality.

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Diet is a significant determinant of human health(Reference Fanzo, Drewnowski and Blumberg1), and the relationship between food consumption and non-communicable diseases (NCD) has been extensively reported(Reference Schwingshackl, Schwedhelm and Hoffmann2). According to the Global Burden of Disease Study, one in five deaths and one in six disability-adjusted life years are attributed to poor-quality diets, representing the most critical risk factor globally(Reference Wang, Li and Afshin3,Reference Afshin and Murray4) . Projections indicate that food-related diseases’ prevalence will increase in the following decades unless strategies to modify the trajectory are applied, particularly in low- and middle-income countries(5).

Ultra-processed foods (UPF) are industrial formulations manufactured with multiple ingredients, typically containing cosmetic additives such as colourings, flavourings, sweeteners and emulsifiers, with little whole food. Because UPF are typically ready-to-consume, cheap, hyper-palatable, and aggressively marketed food and drink products(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy6), their sales and consumption have increased progressively and steadily over the last decades globally(Reference Baker, Machado and Santos7). UPF are energy-dense and highly concentrated in unhealthy nutrients such as Na, free sugars and unhealthy fats (trans and saturated fats)(Reference Poti, Mendez and Ng8).

The characteristics mentioned above make UPF highly preferred by consumers, generating a displacement effect in consuming fresh or minimally processed foods such as fruits, vegetables and legumes. Several studies have shown that UPF have displaced and are displacing staple foods worldwide, shaping the food supply, the food culture and the dietary patterns(Reference Monteiro, Moubarac and Cannon9). The nature of UPF indicates that these changes are harmful to public health(Reference Elizabeth, Machado and Zinocker10). Several studies based on nationally representative cross-sectional surveys have shown that increased UPF intake is associated with higher content of nutrients related to NCD and decreasing the dietary diversity of natural foods and the content of fibre and vitamins(Reference Louzada, Ricardo and Steele11Reference Marron-Ponce, Sanchez-Pimienta and Rodriguez-Ramirez18). In recent years, several studies revealed associations of high consumption of UPF with several NCD such as for overweight and obesity(Reference Lane, Davis and Beattie19,Reference Pagliai, Dinu and Madarena20) , type 2 diabetes(Reference Srour, Fezeu and Kesse-Guyot21), hypertension(Reference Mendonca, Lopes and Pimenta22), dyslipidemias(Reference Srour, Fezeu and Kesse-Guyot23), coronary diseases, stroke(Reference Chen, Zhang and Yang24), metabolic syndrome(Reference Lane, Davis and Beattie19,Reference Pagliai, Dinu and Madarena20) , all cancers and breast cancer(Reference Fiolet, Srour and Sellem25).

Argentina is a middle-income country with malnutrition in all its forms but has comparatively lower undernutrition indices and higher overweight prevalence(Reference Zapata, Soruco and Carmuega26) than the other countries in Latin America(Reference Wang, Li and Afshin3). The prevalence of obesity reaches 3·6 % in <5 years, 20·4 % in the population aged 5 to 17 years, and 33·9 % in the population 18 old years and over(27), 12·3 % of adults report high blood glucose or diabetes, 28·9 % high cholesterol and 34·7 % high blood pressure(28). Remarkably, Argentina has one of the region’s highest UPF sales per capita(29). Despite the relevance of the issue, few studies analysed the contribution of UPF in diets(Reference Drake, Abeya Gilardon and Mangialavori30,Reference Zapata, Rovirosa and Carmuega31) , but it was limited to the assessment of nutrients related to NCD. Therefore, the present study aims to assess the influence of UPF consumption on the intake of specific food groups and critical nutrients for developing NCD in the Argentinian population of children and women of reproductive age, using dietary data collected from a nationally representative nutritional survey.

Methods

Data source and sampling

We utilised dietary data collected during the 2005 National Survey of Health and Nutrition (ENNyS) of Argentina, a nationally representative and cross-sectional survey of maternal and child populations of urban areas carried out by the Ministry of Health(32). Using a probabilistic multi-stage sample involving localities, census blocks and three independent samples: 32 474 boys and girls between 6 months and 5 years, 8307 women aged 11–49 years, and 1941 pregnant women. We analysed data from 7022 children (2–5 years of age), 2165 adolescent females (10–19 years of age) and 4414 adult women (20–49 years of age).

Food consumption was collected at the interviewee’s home by one 24-h dietary recall interview conducted by trained nutritionists, for adolescents and adults or to the person responsible for feeding young children in the case of 2–5-year-old participants. The institution’s managers gave information about the food consumed in day-care centres and schools by children and adolescents. It was registered the consumption of everything eaten by individuals the day before the survey, including food, beverages (except drinking water and infusions), and mineral and vitamin supplements of particular interest. The interviewers used visual food models with colour photographs of portions of different food sizes and references of raw and cooked weight amounts. The composition of some preparations was previously standardised using essential and regional recipes. Details on the methodology of ENNyS can be found elsewhere(32).

Additional information for the analysis was obtained from a general questionnaire with details of household characteristics and assets and sociodemographic characteristics of the head of households and participants. Aspects of the study were provided, and participants were asked to sign informed consent before their inclusion in the study.

Food classification according to processing

The food items were sorted into mutually exclusive food subgroups within: (1) unprocessed or minimally processed foods (eleven subgroups: e.g. fresh meat, roots, and tubers, cereals, vegetables, legumes, fruits); (2) processed culinary ingredients (four subgroups: e.g. plant oils, table sugar, animal fats); (3) processed foods (five subgroups: e.g. unpackaged fresh bread, cheese, ham, and salted meat, vegetables and fruits preserved in brine or sugar syrup); and (4) UPF (seventeen subgroups: e.g. carbonated soft drinks, sweet or savoury snacks, confectionery, industrial desserts, reconstituted meat products, shelf-stable or frozen meals, industrial packaged bread), according to the grade of processing by following the NOVA system classification(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy6). Details of categorisation can be found in Table 1 in Supplemental Material.

Total energy and nutrient intake assessment

To obtain the nutritional profile of diets, we estimated the energy and nutrients provided by each food item. Given that a complete local database for the nutrient compositions of foods and beverages is not available for Argentina, we combined different sources of nutritional composition databases. Although the Argenfoods database(33) was the primary source, we also utilised the USDA database(34), the Germany database(Reference Souci, Fachmann and Kraut35) and the National Nutritional Institute of Salta University database(36). Also, we have used the information from food labels for some products that are not reported in any of the databases mentioned above and some data obtained in the CESNI laboratory (Centro de Estudios Sobre Nutrición Infantil, a Non-Government Organization of Argentina).

Thus, the diet’s nutrient composition was assessed by the daily intake of energy, total proteins, total carbohydrates, available carbohydrates, free sugars, fibre, total fats, saturated fats, Na and K. It was calculated considering the edible part of each food item and their energy and nutrient composition. Finally, the contribution of every NOVA food group was estimated.

Data analysis

The intake was reported (mean and standard error) in absolute terms (grams or milligrams) and considering the energy intake relative to the total daily intake of the specific participant.

The dietary pattern of children, adolescent females and adult females was described by distributing the total energy intake according to the four NOVA food groups, and within these groups, according to selected subgroups.

After that, we analysed the average energy contribution of UPF and the impact of the consumption of these products on specific food groups and critical nutrients related to NCD by considering the recommendations of the WHO(37). Firstly, the 421 food items reported in the 24-h dietary recall were classified into five food groups, fresh vegetables, fresh fruits, legumes, nuts and seeds, and wholegrains (Table 2 in Supplemental Material) and were estimated the consumption in 2000 kcal/d. Secondly, we assess the daily intake of protein, free sugar, fibre, total fats, saturated fat, trans-fat, fibre, Na and K(3741). Fibre, Na and K intake were expressed per 2000 kcal, while the other nutrients were expressed as a percentage of total energy intake. The energy density of solid fraction was calculated by dividing the sum of energy from the intake of solid foods by the amount in grams of these foods. The recommendations used for this indicator were those proposed by the World Cancer Research Fund(42).

Each nutritional indicator was estimated for the overall diet, for NOVA 1-2-3 categories (the fraction of non-UPF) and NOVA 4 category (the fraction of UPF). The indicators were used to evaluate the dietary quality of the population strata corresponding to the distribution quintiles of caloric contribution from UPF to total calories. Linear regression analyses were used to identify the direction and the statistical significance of the association between the distribution quintiles of caloric contribution from UPF (as % of the energy of UPF) and nutritional indicators as the dependent variable, with and without fitting for confounding variables (age, gender in children 2–5 years, geographic region, years of schooling of the head of the family in children and adolescent aged 10–19 years, years of education of women aged 20–49 years, unsatisfaction of basic needs, household income per capita divided into quintiles).

Individuals were classified into five strata according to the caloric value that UPF contributed to the total value of their diet. These strata were related to the distribution quintiles of caloric contribution from UPF across the population.

Results

Distribution of total energy intake by food group

We estimated a mean daily energy intake of 1636 ± 620 kcal among children, 1956 ± 829 kcal in adolescent females and 1695 ± 800 kcal in adult females, with differences in the participation of each NOVA food group (Fig. 1). For more details on the contribution of each food item, see Table 1.

Fig. 1 Contribution to the daily energy intake of each NOVA food group (first bar) and share of total energy of ultra-processed food (second bar). Argentinian children and women population (2005).

Table 1 Distribution of total energy intake according to NOVA food groups. Argentinian children and women population (2005)

Other processed culinary ingredients include cornstarch and honey. Other processed foods include salted roasted peanuts, chips, churros, potato gnocchi, fried cakes ( torta fritas), dulce de batata, dulce de membrillo, jalea de membrillo and fruit jam. Other ultra-processed foods include creamy canned maize, canned diet peaches, canned diet pears, instant and canned soups, instant meals, margarine, and distilled alcoholic beverages.

Minimally processed food accounted for 41 % of daily energy intake in children, while in adolescent and adult females, the intake of minimally processed foods provided 31 % and 33 % of daily energy, respectively. Milk and plain yogurt were the essential food items in children (15 %), and meat and cereals contributed with most calories in adolescent and adult females (10–12 %). The relative energy intake from processed culinary ingredients was 15 % in children, 16 % in adolescent females and 20 % in adult females, being table sugar the primary source of calories in this group (about 7–10 %). Processed foods contributed 16 % of total calories in children, 21 % in adolescent females and 20 % in adult females. The main contributor was fresh bread with about 12–15 % of total energy.

Concerning UPF, they represented 27·5 % of daily energy in children and 31·5 % in adolescent females, while in adult females, the participation was 26 %. Most calories from UPF were related to cookies, pastries, cakes, packaged bread and crackers (about 11 % of total daily intake), followed by soft drinks and juices (about 5 % of total daily intake). Sweets and candies represented 5 % of total daily intake in children and adolescents and 2 % in adult women. Milk-based drinks and yogurt contributed 3 % of energy in children and 1 % in adolescents and women.

The nutrient profile of the diet

As can be observed in Table 2, the overall diet of the analysed Argentinian population presented an unhealthy profile. On the one hand, the number of fruits and vegetables consumed was very low (169–227 g/d), well below the WHO recommendations (400 g/d). In addition, the total intake of wholegrains, legumes, nuts and seeds reached a low quantity of 7–14 g/d. On the other hand, the consumption of free sugar and saturated fats exceeds the recommended levels (<10 % of the total energy of both nutrients) in the three age groups. Moreover, the consumption of fibre and potassium was deficient, three- and twofold below the optimal intake level, respectively. In addition, although the reported Na intake was relatively low, the Na:K ratio was <1:3 in all groups. However, the survey did not account for salt intake during meal preparation or at the table. Thus, Na consumption could have been higher than the figure reported here, increasing the Na:K ratio further. It is worth mentioning that the consumption of trans-fats was just below the recommended intake (<1 %).

Table 2 Indicators of diet quality of the overall diet and two diet fractions. Argentinian children and women population (2005)

UPF contributed significantly to the intake mentioned above of unhealthy nutrients. Compared to the fraction of the diet concerning non-UPF, the fraction referring to UPF has 1·6 to 1·8 more energy/g, 1·5 to 2 more trans-fat, 2·1 to 4·2 more added sugar, 3·3 to 5·3 more Na, depending on the age group. In addition, the UPF fraction was two times lower in fibre, proteins and K content. Non-processed and ultra-processed fractions have similar fat and saturated fat contents, especially in adolescents and women. Regarding saturated fats, its primary sources were both UPF and non-UPF because of the high consumption of animal products in Argentina, particularly red meat (Table 2).

Nutrient profile and healthy food consumption according to UPF intake

An interesting pattern emerged when the population was classified according to their consumption of UPF and adjusted by sociodemographic variables. Table 3 presents the nutritional dietary profile indicators for the five strata of the population corresponding to increasing quintiles in energy contribution from UPF. Besides UPF being an important source of free sugar in all the analysed groups, a positive association between UPF consumption and free sugar intake was found only in children and adolescent females (r = 0·47 and 0·34, P < 0·001). While UPF did not contribute significantly to the intake of trans-fat, higher consumption of UPF was also positively associated with trans-fat intake in the three groups (r = 0·40, 0·46 and 0·51, P < 0·001). Na, total fat and saturated fat also increased with higher consumption of UPF, but the association was weaker (r < 0·30, P < 0·001; see Table 3). The same trend was observed for fibre, protein and K (r < -0·35, P < 0·001; Table 3 for more details). Also, we found a negative association between the consumption of UPF and fresh and whole foods (r < -0·30, P < 0·001), showing a potential displacement effect. This result was particularly evident in the highest quintile of UPF consumption, in which a deficient intake of fresh fruits was observed in all age groups analysed.

Table 3 Indicators of diet quality across quintiles of the dietary share of ultra-processed foods. Argentinian children and women population (2005)

* P value <0·001.

Obtained by regressing indicators on quintiles of the dietary share of ultra-processed foods.

Adjusted for sociodemographic variables (age, sex in children aged 2–5 years, geographic region, years of schooling of head of family in children and women aged 10–19 years, years of schooling of women aged 20–49 years, unsatisfaction of basic needs, income, income level (quintile)).

** Mean values.

*** Quintiles of energy from UPF (% kcal). In children aged 2–5 years (Q1: 0–9·3 %; Q2: 9·4–20·6 %; Q3: 20·7–31·1 %; Q4: 31·2–43·8 %; Q5: 43·9–100 %). In women aged 10–19 years (Q1: 0–8·3 %; Q2: 8·4–20·8 %; Q3: 20·9–32·8 %; Q4: 32·9–47·0 %; Q5: 47·1–100 %). In women aged 20–49 years (Q1: 0–5·4 %; Q2: 5·5–15·9 %; Q3: 16·0–27·1 %; Q4: 27·2–41·7 %; Q5: 41·8–100 %).

Discussion

Our results showed that in 2005, the UPF supplied more than a quarter of total daily energy in children, adolescent females and adult females in Argentina. Across all age groups, the major contributors to UPF consumption were cookies and pastries (about 6·0–7·0 %), soft drinks (about 2·7–3·7 %), candies (about 1·8–4·6 %), and juices (about 1·3–1·7 %). We also found that UPF consumption was negatively associated with the intake of fresh vegetables, fresh fruits and legumes. It was the most important source of free sugar, Na and refined carbohydrates. It showed a significant positive association between the dietary share of UPF and the dietary content of NCD-promoting nutrients such as free sugars and total saturated and trans-fats, contributing significantly to the unhealthy profile of the Argentinian diet.

The estimated dietary share of UPF found here was similar to that reported in more recent studies for Mexico (29·8 % of total energy intake)(Reference Marrón-Ponce, Flores and Cediel15) and Chile (28·6 %)(Reference Cediel, Reyes, Cor and valan17) in the general population but higher than Brazil (21·5 %)(Reference Louzada, Ricardo and Steele11) and Colombia (15·9 %)(Reference Parra, da Costa-Louzada and Moubarac14). Comparatively, these results are much lower than those found in high-income countries such as the USA (57·9 %)(Reference Martinez Steele, Popkin and Swinburn12), Canada (47·7 %)(Reference Moubarac, Batal and Louzada13) and Australia (42·0 %)(Reference Machado, Steele and Levy16). However, studies that analysed the purchase of UPF have shown that it is likely that UPF consumption has increased during the last decade in Argentina, reaching nearly 30 % of daily energy(Reference Zapata, Rovirosa and Carmuega31).

As was observed in our results, previous studies on food sales showed that(29,Reference Zapata, Rovirosa and Carmuega31) cookies, pastries, crackers, soft drinks and juices, and sweets were the most consumed UPF in Argentina, a pattern of preference for UPF similar to that in other countries of the region(29). In addition, we also found a deficient intake of fresh and whole foods such as fruits, vegetables, legumes, wholegrains, nuts and seeds in the analysed population, which contributed to undermining public health(Reference Afshin and Murray4). The observed increase in the consumption of UPF during the last decades in Argentina (including the ready-to-eat meals) has caused a displacement in the intake of healthy foods. For instance, in Argentina, fruits are usually consumed as a dessert, particularly after lunch, and in many cases is the only instance of fruit intake during the day. The inclusion of UPF desserts such as sweets, candies and ice cream could compete directly with the consumption of fruits. In addition, snacks also compete with the consumption of fruits in between main meals. In the same line, ready-to-eat meals displaced homemade meals’ with vegetables and other culinary ingredients. This dietary pattern is of concern given the high prevalence of childhood and adult overweight and obesity in Argentina and hypertension, coronary diseases, stroke, and type 2 diabetes in the general population(43). In this sense, our findings provide helpful evidence for formulating national food policies to improve dietary quality.

Different strategies could be implemented in Argentina to decrease the consumption of UPF, from taxation and marketing controls to food subsidies, front-of-package labelling, and shifts in school foods and the school food environment(Reference Popkin, Barquera and Corvalan44). These policies have already been shown to reduce the consumption of harmful products, such as tobacco and alcohol. Many countries have applied one or more of these initiatives(Reference Moodie, Stuckler and Monteiro45). Although each of these policies can have an effect on the consumption of UPF, the evidence suggests that the most promising approaches are those that comprise multiple coordinated policies. For instance, a 5 % increase in the price of soft drinks through taxation, implemented by the Government of Chile in 2014, reduced the consumption of 3 % of high-sugar beverages(Reference Caro, Corvalan and Reyes46). However, warning labelling in soft drinks decreased their consumption by 23 %(Reference Taillie, Reyes and Colchero47). National policies can substantially modify the food environment in which people purchase and consume foods and affect millions of people simultaneously and are crucial to preventing rapid increases in the intake of unhealthy food products and nutrition-related NCD(Reference Moreira, Hyseni and Moubarac48,Reference Adams, Hofman and Moubarac49) .

A bill is being intensely discussed in the Argentinian national congress for implementing a law that includes front-of-pack labelling of food and non-alcoholic beverages, regulation of marketing and advertising of unhealthy foods, and nutritional education in school environments. However, because of the low consumption of fruits, vegetables, wholegrains, legumes, nuts and seeds, food policies oriented towards increasing the intake of these food groups is also critical for dietary quality improvement(Reference Afshin and Murray4). Such policies should be designed in a holistic framework and then consider both supply- and demand-side interventions to create food environments that allow the population to make healthy choices(Reference Lartey, Hemrich and Amoroso50). Additionally, it might be convenient to include in the dietary guidelines recommendations according to the degree of food processing, including recommendations such as avoiding the consumption of UPF and increasing the consumption of natural foods, combinations of foods, dishes, and meals, and the social and cultural dimensions of dietary patterns in concordance with Brazil and Uruguay guidelines, neighbour countries with similar conditions to Argentina.

Potential limitations should be considered. The analysis was performed from one 24-h recall. However, the standardised methods and approach minimise possible error and bias, particularly for assessing population averages as focused on in the present study. In addition, although information indicative of food processing was collected, these data were missing for some food items and thus may have led to errors in food classification. As we had a conservative position regarding the classification of UPF (they were only classified as UPF when there was absolute certainty), exists a possible under-estimation in the estimation of consumption of these products. These data are more than a decade old. They correspond to the first national nutrition and health survey, the only one available so far, and it is expected that the new study in progress can update the landscape. At the same time, this analysis will provide a baseline and comparison point for future research. Though the addition of salt to meals is not included in the study. The high intake of Na in all fractions suggests that in addition to reducing the Na content of industrialised foods, it is necessary to strengthen campaigns to minimise the addition of salt to meals during their preparation or consumption at the domestic level.

Our study has several strengths. We studied a large, nationally representative sample of the infant and maternal Argentina population. This study is the first to evaluate the dietary contribution of UPF and the NCD-related nutrient profile of Argentinian diets providing updated and relevant results for informing the public health agenda. These may also serve as baseline results to measure the impact of a set of regulations being implemented by the Argentinian government aimed at improving diets.

Conclusion

UPF consumption contributed to the total energy intake in Argentina’s children and women of reproductive age, reaching more than 25 %. In addition, the dietary share of UPF negatively affected the consumption of fresh and whole foods. It was positively associated with the intake of critical nutrients for NCD development, mainly free sugar.

Due to the high prevalence of overweight/obesity and other food-related NCD in Argentina, decreasing the consumption of UPF through food policies is urgent. However, these initiatives should be accompanied by different strategies that aim to improve dietary quality by increasing unprocessed or minimally processed foods consumption to guide the population to achieve healthy eating recommendations.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: We acknowledge the Ministry of Health permission to use the Nutrition and Health National Survey, 2005 database.

Financial support: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Authorship: M.E.Z., G.C., A.R., E.C. and C.A.M. designed the research. M.E.Z. and A.R. analysed the data. M.E.Z., G.C., E.A. and A.R. drafted the paper with contributions from the other authors. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and the CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; 2016). All procedures were approved by Ethics Committee of the Clínicas Hospital of the University of Buenos Aires.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022002543

References

Fanzo, J, Drewnowski, A, Blumberg, J et al. (2020) Nutrients, foods, diets, people: promoting healthy eating. Curr Dev Nutr 4, nzaa069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwingshackl, L, Schwedhelm, C, Hoffmann, G et al. (2017) Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr 105, 14621473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, DD, Li, Y, Afshin, A et al. (2019) Global improvement in dietary quality could lead to substantial reduction in premature death. J Nutr 149, 10651074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Afshin, A & Murray, CJL (2019) Uncertainties in the GBD 2017 estimates on diet and health – authors’ reply. Lancet 394, 18021803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NCD Countdown Collaborators (2018) NCD countdown 2030: worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards sustainable development goal target 3.4. Lancet 392, 10721088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Levy, RB et al. (2019) Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr 22, 936941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P, Machado, P, Santos, T et al. (2020) Ultra-processed foods and the nutrition transition: global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers. Obes Rev 21, e13126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poti, JM, Mendez, MA, Ng, SW et al. (2015) Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households? Am J Clin Nutr 101, 12511262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, CA, Moubarac, JC, Cannon, G et al. (2013) Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes Rev 14, Suppl. 2, 2128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elizabeth, L, Machado, P, Zinocker, M et al. (2020) Ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a narrative review. Nutrients 12, 1955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louzada, M, Ricardo, CZ, Steele, EM et al. (2018) The share of ultra-processed foods determines the overall nutritional quality of diets in Brazil. Public Health Nutr 21, 94102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez Steele, E, Popkin, BM, Swinburn, B et al. (2017) The share of ultra-processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. Popul Health Metr 15, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moubarac, JC, Batal, M, Louzada, ML et al. (2017) Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite 108, 512520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parra, DC, da Costa-Louzada, ML, Moubarac, JC et al. (2019) The association between ultra-processed food consumption and the nutrient profile of the Colombian diet in 2005. Salud Publica Mex 61, 147154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marrón-Ponce, JA, Flores, M, Cediel, G et al. (2019) Associations between consumption of ultra-processed foods and intake of nutrients related to chronic non-communicable diseases in Mexico. J Acad Nutr Diet 119, 18521865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, PP, Steele, EM, Levy, RB et al. (2019) Ultra-processed foods and recommended intake levels of nutrients linked to non-communicable diseases in Australia: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 9, e029544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cediel, G, Reyes, M, Cor, valan, C et al. (2021) Ultra-processed foods drive to unhealthy diets: evidence from Chile. Public Health Nutr 24, 16981707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marron-Ponce, JA, Sanchez-Pimienta, TG, Rodriguez-Ramirez, S et al. (2022) Ultra-processed foods consumption reduces dietary diversity and micronutrient intake in the Mexican population. J Hum Nutr Diet. Published online: 12 March 2022. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13003.Google ScholarPubMed
Lane, MM, Davis, JA, Beattie, S et al. (2021) Ultraprocessed food and chronic noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies. Obes Rev 22, e13146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagliai, G, Dinu, M, Madarena, MP et al. (2021) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 125, 308318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srour, B, Fezeu, LK, Kesse-Guyot, E et al. (2020) Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes among participants of the NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. JAMA 180, 283291.Google ScholarPubMed
Mendonca, RD, Lopes, AC, Pimenta, AM et al. (2017) Ultra-processed food consumption and the incidence of hypertension in a Mediterranean cohort: the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra project. Am J Hypertens 30, 358366.Google Scholar
Srour, B, Fezeu, LK, Kesse-Guyot, E et al. (2019) Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Santé). BMJ 365, l1451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X, Zhang, Z, Yang, H et al. (2020) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Nutr J 19, 86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiolet, T, Srour, B, Sellem, L et al. (2018) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Sante prospective cohort. BMJ 360, k322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zapata, ME, Soruco, AI & Carmuega, E (2020) Malnutrition in all its forms and socio-economic indicators in Argentina. Public Health Nutr 23, Suppl. 1, s13s20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Secretaría de Gobierno de Salud (2019) 2° Encuesta Nacional de Nutrición y Salud 2018 (2nd National Survey of Nutrition and Health 2018). Resultados Preliminares Argentina. https://bancos.salud.gob.ar/recurso/2deg-encuesta-nacional-de-nutricion-y-salud-indicadores-priorizados (accessed May 2021).Google Scholar
Secretaría de Gobierno de Salud (2019) 4° Encuesta Nacional de Factores de Riesgo (4th National Survey of Risk Factors). Informe definitivo. In: Transmisibles DNdPdlSyCdECN, editor. Argentina. https://bancos.salud.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2020-01/4ta-encuesta-nacional-factores-riesgo_2019_informe-definitivo.pdf (accessed May 2021).Google Scholar
Organización Panamericana de la Salud (2019) Alimentos y Bebidas Ultraprocesados en América Latina: Ventas, Fuentes, Perfiles de Nutrientes e Implicaciones (Ultra-Processed Foods and Beverages in Latin America: Sales, Sources, Nutrient Profiles and Implications). Washington, DC: OPS.Google Scholar
Drake, I, Abeya Gilardon, E, Mangialavori, G et al. (2018) Description of nutrient consumption based on the level of industrial food processing: national survey on nutrition and health of 2005. Arch Argent Pediatr 116, 345352.Google Scholar
Zapata, ME, Rovirosa, A & Carmuega, E (2016) La Mesa Argentina en Las Últimas dos Décadas: Cambios en el Patrón de Consumo de Alimentos y Nutrientes 1996–2013 (The Argentine Table in the Last Two Decades: Changes in the Pattern of Food and Nutrient Consumption 1996–2013). Argentina: CESNI.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Salud de la Nación (2007) Encuesta Nacional de Nutrición y Salud (National Survey of Nutrition and Health). Documento de Resultados. https://bancos.salud.gob.ar/recurso/encuesta-nacional-de-nutricion-y-salud-documento-de-resultados-2007 (accessed July 2021).Google Scholar
Universidad Nacional de Luján (2014) Tabla de Argenfoods (Argenfoods table). Proyecto Infoods, Universidad de Naciones Unidas. http://www.argenfoods.unlu.edu.ar/Tablas/Tabla.htm (accessed March 2020).Google Scholar
USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (2016) National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/ (accessed March 2020).Google Scholar
Souci, W, Fachmann, H & Kraut, MBH (2000) Food Composition and Nutrition Tables. Stuttgart: Medpharm Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Nutrición (1945) Tablas de Composición Química de los Alimentos (Food Chemical Composition Tables). Argentina: Dirección Nacional de Salud Pública, Ministerio del Interior.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2003) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 916, 6171.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2007) Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series, 935. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2009) Fats and Fatty Acids in Human Nutrition: Report of an Expert Consultation. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper, 91. Geneva: FAO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2013) WHO Issues New Guidance on Dietary Salt and Potassium. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2012) Effect of Increased Potassium Intake on Cardiovascular Disease, Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Cancer Research Foundation (2009) Energy Density: Finding the Balance for Cancer Prevention. London: World Cancer Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (2021) GBD Compare. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed July 2021).Google Scholar
Popkin, BM, Barquera, S, Corvalan, C et al. (2021) Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9, 462470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moodie, R, Stuckler, D, Monteiro, C et al. (2013) Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet 381, 670679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caro, JC, Corvalan, C, Reyes, M et al. (2018) Chile’s 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: an observational study in an urban environment. PLoS Med 15, e1002597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taillie, LS, Reyes, M, Colchero, MA et al. (2020) An evaluation of Chile’s law of food labeling and advertising on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: a before-and-after study. PLoS Med 17, e1003015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreira, PV, Hyseni, L, Moubarac, JC et al. (2018) Effects of reducing processed culinary ingredients and ultra-processed foods in the Brazilian diet: a cardiovascular modelling study. Public Health Nutr 21, 181188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J, Hofman, K, Moubarac, JC et al. (2020) Public health response to ultra-processed food and drinks. BMJ 369, m2391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lartey, A, Hemrich, G, Amoroso, L et al. (2016) Influencing Food Environments for Healthy Diets.. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Contribution to the daily energy intake of each NOVA food group (first bar) and share of total energy of ultra-processed food (second bar). Argentinian children and women population (2005).

Figure 1

Table 1 Distribution of total energy intake according to NOVA food groups. Argentinian children and women population (2005)

Figure 2

Table 2 Indicators of diet quality of the overall diet and two diet fractions. Argentinian children and women population (2005)

Figure 3

Table 3 Indicators of diet quality across quintiles of the dietary share of ultra-processed foods. Argentinian children and women population (2005)

Supplementary material: File

Zapata et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Zapata et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.1 KB