Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-mhr6q Total loading time: 1.146 Render date: 2022-11-28T12:56:55.230Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Roles, perceptions and control of infant feeding among low-income fathers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2009

Kirsten E Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 229 Jessie Harris Building, 1215 West Cumberland, Knoxville, TN 37996-1920, USA
Jennifer C Nicklas
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 229 Jessie Harris Building, 1215 West Cumberland, Knoxville, TN 37996-1920, USA
Marsha Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 229 Jessie Harris Building, 1215 West Cumberland, Knoxville, TN 37996-1920, USA
Katherine Kavanagh
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 229 Jessie Harris Building, 1215 West Cumberland, Knoxville, TN 37996-1920, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email Kirsten.kander33@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Introduction of solid foods before the recommended age of 4–6 months is a common practice in the USA, and appears to be especially prevalent among infants who are enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Currently, little is known about how fathers influence early infant feeding decisions, outside the decision to breast- or formula-feed. The purpose of the current study was to explore how fathers perceive the role they play in feeding and caring for their infants.

Design

Participants were twenty-one male caregivers, who were fathers or partners of the mothers of WIC income-eligible infants residing in two rural East Tennessee counties. In-depth, audio-taped telephone interviews were completed. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed according to standard grounded theory procedures to identify emergent concepts. These concepts were explored and linked together to become themes.

Results

Three themes emerged: (i) fathers’ roles; (ii) fathers’ perceptions; and (iii) control. Concepts within the theme of fathers’ roles included physical and emotional support for both mother and infant, validation of maternal decisions, and financial support. In the present study, fathers’ perceptions were primarily shaped by their own experiences, advice from those with experience, and information sought by the fathers. The theme of control appears to be the linkage between the fathers’ attempts to modify infant behaviour and infants’ response.

Conclusions

A final conceptual model was created to explain the interrelated nature of the themes and may be helpful to those who work with fathers and/or families of new infants.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Childhood overweight and obesity is a complex, multifaceted health concern that is expected to continue its upward trend in the 21st century(Reference James1Reference Dehghan, Akhtar-Danesh and Merchant4). Conditions such as diabetes(Reference Shaw5), metabolic disease(Reference Sun, Liang and Huang6), CVD(Reference Orio, Palomba and Cascella7), asthma(Reference Carroll, Stoltz and Raykov8) and sleep apnoea(Reference Kohler, Lushington and Couper9) are prevalent among overweight children. In addition, there appears to be a health inequity, with weight inversely associated with socio-economic status(Reference Shrewsbury and Wardle10). One piece of the obesity puzzle may be explained by rapid infant weight gain. Several researchers have linked rapid weight gain in early infancy to later overweight in childhood(Reference Ong, Emmett and Noble11Reference Stettler, Zemel and Kumanyika14). It is unclear how the mode of early infant feeding may impact this rapid rate of gain. The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition recommends delaying the introduction of solid foods to at least 4 months of age or longer(Reference Gartner, Morton and Lawrence15). However, recent research suggests that early introduction of solid foods appears to be prevalent in the USA(Reference Briefel, Reidy and Karwe16) and may be associated with accelerated infant weight gain(Reference Ong, Emmett and Noble11). Participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) appear to be more likely than those not participating in WIC to introduce foods before this 4 month recommendation(Reference Jacknowitz, Novillo and Tiehen17).

How families decide to feed infants is likely to be influenced by many factors, including exposure to WIC nutrition education, paediatrician advice, grandmother advice and others(Reference Zehle, Wen and Orr18, Reference Arora, McJunkin and Wehrer19). In addition, several studies have reported on the influence of the infant’s father, or partner of the mother, on the decision to breast- or formula-feed(Reference Arora, McJunkin and Wehrer19Reference Wolfberg, Michels and Shields22). However, little is known about how these male caregivers influence the introduction of foods other than breast milk or formula. The aim of the current project was to investigate the perceptions of male caregivers of 4- to 6-month-old infants regarding their roles in decision making about infant feeding and specifically the introduction to solid foods.

Methods

Script development

An approximately 30 min long interview script was developed based on a topical literature review and feedback received from an expert in maternal and infant nutrition. Six content areas were included in the script (Table 1). The script was used to guide discussions with the male caregivers. However, if new topics arose during a conversation, the researcher could probe more deeply and did not have to follow the script with rigor. This method of interviewing, referred to as the ‘general interview guide approach’, is outlined by Patton(Reference Patton23). As new ideas emerged in the initial interviews, the script was modified to include both questions in these new emergent areas and questions from the original script.

Table 1 Content areas (1–6) and questions from interview script for low-income fathers

WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

Recruitment, screening, eligibility and interviewing

Recruitment was conducted through: (i) a voluntary birth registry housed at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville; (ii) fliers distributed at one WIC clinic; (iii) an advertisement in a daily student newspaper; (iv) and word-of-mouth. Potential participants were encouraged to contact the project’s research lab to be assessed for eligibility. Approval for the study was granted by the Institutional Review Boards from the University of Tennessee and the State of Tennessee.

To identify male participants, mothers were screened first. Eligibility requirements included having an infant who was 0–6 months old; being a WIC participant or meeting the WIC income eligibility guidelines (WIC income eligibility is based on a particular income level per particular household size, set at 185 % of the Federal Poverty Level); and having a male caregiver in the infant’s life who was either the father or someone who functioned as a father figure to the infant. In addition, the male caregiver had to speak English. The male caregiver could not be a male family member (i.e. brother, infant’s grandfather, etc.) or companion (without the role of father figure in the infant’s life) of the mother.

Any mother who contacted the research lab regarding the study was asked if there was a male caregiver involved in the infant’s life. Respondents were generally mothers recruited via flyers from WIC, newspaper or word-of-mouth. Mothers contacted via the voluntary university birth registry had previously agreed to be contacted and screened by the research lab. Screenings occurred over the telephone to determine if an infant had a male caregiver who met eligibility requirements for the current study. If a potential male caregiver was identified, contact information was collected and the lead researcher verified interest via telephone call. If interested in participating, identified male caregivers were mailed a consent form and an interview was scheduled. Informed consent was verified through audio-recorded verbal acknowledgement that the male caregiver had received, read, understood and chose to consent to the interview.

All interviews were conducted by the lead researcher for continuity of questioning and to allow for more rapid identification of emerging themes. Upon completion of the interview, male caregivers were mailed modest compensation. Saturation for the study was defined to be the point at which no new additional themes or categories developed. Few new themes developed after the twelfth interview and saturation was reached by the twenty-first interview. This point of saturation is supported by the estimated number required to generally reach saturation as identified by Guest et al., who found that twelve in-depth interviews are generally enough to reach saturation(Reference Guest, Bunce and Johnson24).

Data coding

Data analysis and development of the conceptual model followed a systematic procedure of coding, constant comparison, categorizing and memoing, as outlined by Miles and Huberman(Reference Miles and Huberman25). Interviews were transcribed verbatim into a word-processing software program by research assistants trained in transcription. Subject names were replaced with identification numbers. Inductive coding(Reference David and Sutton26) was utilized for the creation of descriptive and inferential coding, as explained by Miles and Huberman(Reference Miles and Huberman25). Two researchers coded the first interview separately and independently developed a set of codes which included a detailed description of each code. Subsequently, the researchers met and examined the independently developed codes, and agreed upon the codes and definitions to be used in coding the rest of the transcriptions. Within the second and third interviews, additional codes were identified and added to the list of working codes. Segments of coded text varied in length and depth of topic and could contain multiple codes. The researchers met weekly to discuss any new codes and to reach mutual agreement upon the coding of transcripts. At each weekly meeting, three transcripts were discussed. Inter-reliability scores were calculated for each individual transcript and for the average of the three transcripts coded at each meeting. Initial inter-reliability coding of the first three transcripts was 60 %. Few new codes surfaced after the third meeting. With each meeting, average inter-reliability increased until the researchers reached 97 % original agreement at the final (eighth) coding session. Interviewing continued until saturation was achieved, as determined by the researchers during the coding process.

Data analysis

Data analysis continued, after the descriptive and inferential coding was complete, through a process in a series of integrated steps. First, text from coded transcripts was copied from the word-processing file and inserted into a file in an electronic spreadsheet program. Within the file, each tab housed text for a specific code. As noted prior, each segment of text could contain multiple codes. For this reason, each segment was copied into each relevant tab, thus remaining associated with any other codes that were applied to that segment of coded text. The primary researcher examined each set of data by descriptive and inferential code to determine whether there were patterns within each code. Memoing was utilized several different ways within the spreadsheet of organized codes. First, it was used to summarize or question the content of short passages of coded text. Second, it was used after reviewing all of the text related to a specific code to summarize the ideas within the text applicable to the specific code. Finally, memoing was used to relate the ideas within one code to those present among other codes.

In addition to memoing about how the information between codes related, because all codes were left attached to every section of coded text, the researcher was able to examine the recurrence of multiple codes that appeared frequently in association with the code group being examined. Codes that appeared together frequently were recorded at the top of each code category tab in the spreadsheet. This not only identified patterns that emerged between codes, but also helped to cross-validate linkages. The process of determining ideas and organization within each code and then between codes is similar to that used by Jacelon and O’Dell in nursing research(Reference Jacelon and O’Dell27).

Patterns codes were developed as the researcher began to identify linkages among coded materials through memoing in the spreadsheet. For the current study, pattern coding occurred later in data analysis, after relationships between certain codes were better understood. Organizing robust pattern codes and pattern sub-codes led the researcher to several related concepts, which were categorized into themes.

Through discussion of metaphorical modelling(Reference Miles and Huberman25) and revisiting the memos and pattern codes with two other researchers, several exploratory conceptual models were created. The final model was based on consensus about the concepts related to infant feeding and the interrelationships between the themes identified.

Results

Participants

Ninety-three mothers were screened for presence of an eligible male caregiver. Table 2 outlines recruitment sources of participants and number screened. The primary source for recruiting participants was through the voluntary birth registry. Screening for participants from the WIC occurred late in the screening process, secondary to a delay in receiving the differential institutional review board approval from the State. Fifteen (71 %) participants had WIC-enrolled infants, while six (29 %) had infants who were WIC income-eligible, but did not participate in WIC. The primary reason for ineligibility was reporting income higher than the WIC eligibility criterion (47 % of those screened). Three infants were >6 months of age at the time the mothers were contacted, eight of those screened had no male caregiver, and two male caregivers did not speak English. In addition, eleven identified male caregivers refused to participate. Reasons for ineligibility and refusal to participate are displayed in Table 3.

Table 2 Recruitment venues of screened women (mothers of WIC income-eligible infants) and participants (male caregivers, who were fathers or partners of the mothers), rural East Tennessee

WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

Table 3 Reasons for ineligibility and refusal to participate among the screened women (mothers of WIC income-eligible infants) and participants (male caregivers, who were fathers or partners of the mothers), rural East Tennessee

WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

*Number of those ineligible = 61.

†Number who refused = 11.

All participants resided in one of two East Tennessee counties, ranged in age from 21 to 57 years and represented a variety of racial backgrounds and education levels. These data are presented in Table 4. Infants ranged in age from 3 to 6 months. Ten participants were first-time fathers, with the remainder reporting having between two and four other children. Ten participants were married to their partners, while eleven were not. Based on data from the initial screen, three participants were not the biological father. Twenty participants perceived themselves as being ‘more involved’ in the care of their infants than other fathers they knew. However, one participant reported he was at least ‘as involved’ as other fathers. All men participated in the interview as if they were the father figure in the infant’s life and therefore are referred to as the ‘father’ for the remainder of the paper.

Table 4 Characteristics of the participating low-income fathers: male caregivers, who were fathers or partners of the mothers of WIC income-eligible infants residing in two rural East Tennessee counties

WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

*Demographic data for only fourteen of the fathers were obtained for these variables.

Emergence of themes

Initially pattern codes were categorized into the following five major themes: (i) perceptions; (ii) motivators; (iii) roles; (iv) behaviour modification; and (v) control. However, it became apparent during the process that two of the five themes, behaviour modification and motivators, were actually smaller, interrelated concepts within the three major themes of perceptions of fathers, roles of fathers, and control related to the interaction between the father and the infant. Each theme is built on several concepts.

Roles

The theme of roles is built on a number of concepts identified by fathers. These could be proximal, such as feeding or entertaining the infant, or more distal, such as supporting the mother through validation of her decisions or taking care of other children or herself. Therefore, this theme is comprised of the concepts of physical and emotional support, validation of maternal decisions, and financial support. Physically, this role was manifested in the performance of daily tasks, such as preparing bottles, changing diapers, and holding and playing with the infant. This also could include simply taking the infant into another physical space to allow the mother the ability to ‘do whatever she needs to do’, including showering, working out or tending to other children. Among fathers with more than one child, the importance of involving both parents was especially common in order to accomplish daily tasks.

Fathers spoke of their role of offering emotional support to the family. The infant received direct emotional support through play and activities meant to entertain the infant. Fathers talked about wanting to make the infant smile or laugh and identified a healthy infant as one who was ‘happy’ or ‘content’. Development of the infant also was important to the fathers and resulted in activities with the infant that were inherently educational or conducive for infant development. Less proximal was emotional support offered to mothers, which was manifested in offering to perform caregiver duties, thus allowing mothers to have space and time for themselves. Fathers spent time with their partners and talked about offering emotional support through ‘being an advocate’ or being there if mothers needed to ‘vent’.

The fathers’ roles appeared to encompass validation of their partners’ decisions through justification, gathering second opinions or stating justification for decisions regarding infant feeding. The following quote portrays this sentiment:

Well, she thinks about it more than I do, so she’s always thinking of ways to improve whatever we do. She talks to me about it, and we’ll make a joint decision. Honestly, I don’t initiate much of the, you know, I kind of follow her lead because I think her intuition is better than mine…. as far as like decisions about what type of formula and stuff, we both have input but she is probably more of the decider.

Financial support of the family presented itself in the fathers’ stories when they addressed the different types of activities in which they were engaged with the infant. This was often in the context of time, which was offered as a reason why they did not spend more or as much time as they would like with the infants. In this regard, unless the father clearly identified himself as a stay-at-home caregiver, the fathers noted the importance of their role in financially supporting the family as means of indirectly caring for the infant.

Perception

Perceptions of the fathers with regard to infant feeding were influenced by a number of concepts. In order of influence, these concepts included personal experience, advice from those with experience, advice sought by the father from sources such as books, the Internet, magazines, etc., and finally unsolicited advice that may or may not be generated by those who had experience with children. Fathers’ personal experience generally came from those fathers who had other children, although some who did not have other children had experience with other infants, such as younger siblings or other relatives such as nieces or nephews. If mothers had previous experience with children, the fathers regarded this experience similarly to their own experiences. If previous experience was viewed as positive, this increased its value. Fathers with older children, whose development they were satisfied with, remarked on things like: ‘If you do similar things you would expect a similar result’; or ‘We liked the way our first son turned out. And we have been trying to copy what we did with him’. As experience increased, the less the fathers sought advice elsewhere: ‘I actually raised my sister’s baby from 2 days to 3 years. So, I didn’t really have to learn anything this time around. I kind of knew what to expect’.

Advice from those who had raised children was important. Fathers sought advice and second opinions from experienced people and generally thought this advice was superior to advice from others with little direct care-giving experience. Advice from health-care professionals also was held to this standard. Generally, paediatricians and nurses at paediatric clinics did serve as a good source of advice owing to their experience as professionals who care for infants and children. Despite this, advice from health-care professionals who did not have children was less valued than advice from health-care professionals who had experienced parenthood.

They [doctors] seem kind of eloquent sometimes. I guess you take it with a grain of salt sometimes, too. You know, like is this person telling me this and they probably don’t even have any children? You know?

Other sources of advice included infant care books, the Internet, magazines, and pamphlets from their doctors’ office or classes they attended on infant care. Although classes could be hosted by health-care providers or businesses marketing products to infants and children, there was no indication of valuing advice from either of these sources over another. When advice actively was sought from these sources, fathers generally regarded the information as trustworthy and accurate. However, unsolicited advice was perceived to be less valuable and, especially if the source was a mother or mother-in-law, possibly outdated. The decisions of whether or not to accept and act on advice were ultimately filtered through fathers’ own experiences and whether or not the advice seemed sensible.

Control

The theme of control emerged from concepts related to behaviour modification activities by the father and the infant’s response. Behaviour modification actions of fathers directly related to feeding included feeding the infant, introducing cereal and introducing solid foods. Fathers used feeding to modify crying or fussing behaviours in infants. If infants’ responses were positive, then the behaviour modification strategy continued. Although generally aware of infant hunger and satiety cues, these cues were not always attended to if there were other pressures exerted on the fathers, such as prescriptive advice from mothers. In situations where feeding the infant did not produce the desired behaviour, the solution was to explore use of alternative infant formulas until the behaviour was acceptably modified (i.e. lactose intolerance, spitting-up).

Introduction of cereal was another concept within the theme of control. Behaviours targeted for modification included quelling perceived extreme hunger (‘…they weren’t getting enough’), sleeping through the night or spitting-up after feedings. If the infant’s response was positive, such as the infant appearing satisfied with the feed, extended duration of sleep or spitting-up less, fathers continued adding cereal to the infant’s bottle. Introduction of solid foods was initiated for similar reasons, although behaviours targeted for modification were less frustrating for fathers than those targeted by infant cereal. Although there was some recognition that paediatricians recommend starting solid foods at particular developmental stages, the primary motivation for introducing these foods was that the infant appeared to desire the food, by, for example, reaching for or staring at foods. The cyclical relationship between behaviour modification and infant response was apparent in some situations, such as when fathers perceived that the infants’ diet would contribute to constipation and that offering juice would resolve this issue.

Conceptual model

The conceptual model, shown in Fig. 1, was created to show the relationship between the three identified themes described above. This conceptual model shows the relationship between the constructs of fathers’ roles and perceptions that affect control of infant feeding habits is mitigated by interaction between behaviour modification and infant’s response.

Fig. 1 Conceptual model depicting the relationship of fathers’ perceptions, roles and control with regard to infant feeding

The centre of the circle represents the control of infant feeding as the convergence of the father’s roles and perceptions, and being directly shaped through behaviour modification activities by the father and response of the infant. The centre circle of ‘control’ is not dissected by the horizontal line and represents the convergence of the father’s roles and perceptions directly related to the infant and the cyclical nature of behaviour modification and infant response.

The outer layers of the model represent roles and perceptions, with distal and proximal concepts represented by distance to the infant, or centre. The lower portion of the model encompasses the main roles of the father. Layers closest to control in the centre represent the most direct roles the father plays in the infant’s life. As layers get further from the centre they represent roles that are increasingly less directly associated with infant feeding and care. The upper portion of the model represents the many factors that shape the father’s perceptions related to infant feeding. These layers, too, respectively show the most to least influential factor from the centre to the outermost layers.

Discussion

Research has shown that fathers can have an important influence on infant feeding decisions; in particular the decision to breast- or formula-feed has been well documented(Reference Arora, McJunkin and Wehrer19Reference Wolfberg, Michels and Shields22). To our knowledge little has been reported about how fathers view their role in infant feeding beyond breast- or formula-feeding. The model developed here delineates how a father may function in this role and is supported by Gavin et al., who found using an ecological model that it may be possible to clarify relationship boundaries between the father and the mother and that of the father and child(Reference Gavin, Black and Minor28). Therefore, our objective in the present study was to describe the roles and perceptions of low-income fathers regarding infant feeding practices.

Control – circle centre

Behaviour modification activities, such as feeding cereal in the bottle to alleviate infant fussing, increase the period of the infant’s sleep and decrease spitting-up behaviour, and solid foods to satisfy the infant’s desire for these foods, are concepts supported by research with mothers(Reference Anderson, Guthrie and Alder29Reference Habibi, Anderson and Spence31). The introduction of cereal and other solid foods earlier than medically recommended, as was found in the current study, is common practice in the USA(Reference Briefel, Reidy and Karwe16, Reference Jacknowitz, Novillo and Tiehen17). These actions constitute control over behaviour modification and are represented by the control function at the centre of the circle.

Roles – lower portion of circle

Included among the roles of the father are physical and emotional support to both the mother and infant, which have been documented as perceived roles of the father in several other research studies(Reference Premberg, Hellstrom and Berg32Reference Goodman34). A study of families using a new infant’s ‘system’s perspective’ delineated how mothers and fathers perceived their different roles. These researchers found that while fathers took a more central role in playing with the infant, the mother was more central to ‘caring’ for(Reference Bell, Goulet and St-Cyr Tribble35) and feeding the infant(Reference Bramhagen, Axelsson and Hallstrom36). While there are mixed findings in the literature as to how new parents manage chores and tasks(Reference St John, Cameron and McVeigh33, Reference Bell, Goulet and St-Cyr Tribble35), our study found that parents divide tasks based on who has the time and energy for them. The role of providing financial support to the family reflects that found in other literature(Reference St John, Cameron and McVeigh33, Reference Barclay and Lupton37).

Perceptions – upper portion of circle

The present study identified a father’s previous experience as the most influential factor in infant care within the theme of perceptions. Additional research similarly has identified that first-time fathers are less secure in their abilities than experienced fathers(Reference St John, Cameron and McVeigh33). In addition, mothers have been shown to receive advice on infant feeding from family members and health-care professionals(Reference Zehle, Wen and Orr18, Reference Arora, McJunkin and Wehrer19, Reference Habibi, Anderson and Spence31), which were common sources of advice for these fathers. Several successful interventions targeting fathers have demonstrated that when fathers seek information from classes or experienced health-care professionals, their infants are more likely to be fed in accordance with infant feeding recommendations than are infants whose fathers do not seek this trusted, accurate advice(Reference Arora, McJunkin and Wehrer19Reference Wolfberg, Michels and Shields22).

Strengths and limitations

There were strengths and limitations to our study. One strength was that male caregivers were interviewed directly, which research has indicated may provide more accurate data(Reference Caspi, Taylor and Smart38). Another strength was in gaining access to fathers, who are known to be difficult to recruit(Reference Mitchell, See and Tarkow39). Some limitations included that the sample was self-selected and that there was a wide range of ages and varying cultural backgrounds. Although this could be considered a strength, in light of the myriad cultural-feeding practices at large, here it is seen as a limitation because it may have muddied the results(Reference Baughcum, Burklow and Deeks40Reference Wagner and Wagner45). Several male caregivers who were eligible chose not to participate or did not complete the interview process. In addition, permission to recruit via the WIC clinic was received rather late in the recruitment process. It is possible that a larger representation from male caregivers could have come from WIC and the results could have been different had recruitment started earlier. Although these results are not intended to be generalizable, due to the lack of research on the role that fathers play in early infant feeding decisions, the present study provides a first step in filling that knowledge gap. In addition, the conceptual model created may be tested, modified and ultimately used by health-care professionals to develop curricula to educate fathers of low-income infants more effectively.

Conclusion

Fathers appear to play an important role in the lives of their infants, primarily through support of the mother, and are both directly and indirectly involved with food and fluid introduction. Although it appears that it is the mother who is ultimately responsible for making the final decisions associated with infant feeding, fathers are an important filter for information from others, as self-identified researchers regarding infant feeding recommendations and supporters of those decisions ultimately reached by the mother.

Implications

Testing of this theory will be an important first step towards confirmation, modification and ultimate use of the theory among health-care providers. Health-care providers seeking to increase adherence of low-income parents to infant feeding recommendations may wish to use this model to assist with interpreting actions of fathers regarding infant feeding. The model will be tested through use of in-depth interviews with eligible fathers to determine development of survey questions. WIC professionals, who are familiar with fathers of their participants, could be the subject of in-depth interviews as well, to increase the validity of future survey questions. Additional fathers could then be given questionnaires to quantify their relationships to the roles of infant feeding, etc. Understanding how advice may be interpreted by low-income fathers may increase effectiveness of nutrition education. Working collaboratively to include fathers in infant feeding education may increase adherence to recommendations and increase the health of their communities.

Acknowledgements

Source of funding: Internal University funds (K.K. start-up funds). Conflict of interest declaration: No conflicts of interest to note from any author. Authors’ contributions: This is a publication arising from K.E.A.’s Masters thesis. With the assistance of M.S. and K.K., K.E.A. developed the research questions, performed the interviews, analysed the data and wrote up the results. J.C.N. assisted with data analysis, performing the role of coder along with K.E.A., and contributed intellectually to the analysis and theme development. M.S. contributed qualitative research expertise and assisted in the development of the research plan, analysis and model development. K.K. contributed expertise related to infant feeding and low-income populations, and assisted with development of the research plan, write-up and model development. We thank the twenty-one fathers and their families for sharing their stories and their time, and for their good humour. It is hoped that, in some small way, this work will help the research community to serve them, and all families in East Tennessee, in the years to come.

References

1.James, WP (2008) The epidemiology of obesity: the size of the problem. J Intern Med 263, 336352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Wang, Y & Lobstein, T (2006) Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes 1, 1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Kosti, RI & Panagiotakos, DB (2006) The epidemic of obesity in children and adolescents in the world. Cent Eur J Public Health 14, 151159.Google Scholar
4.Dehghan, M, Akhtar-Danesh, N & Merchant, AT (2005) Childhood obesity, prevalence and prevention. Nutr J 4, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Shaw, J (2007) Epidemiology of childhood type 2 diabetes and obesity. Pediatr Diabetes 8, Suppl. 9, 715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Sun, SS, Liang, R, Huang, TT et al. (2008) Childhood obesity predicts adult metabolic syndrome: the Fels Longitudinal Study. J Pediatr 152, 191200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Orio, F Jr, Palomba, S, Cascella, T et al. (2007) Cardiovascular complications of obesity in adolescents. J Endocrinol Invest 30, 7080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Carroll, CL, Stoltz, P, Raykov, N et al. (2007) Childhood overweight increases hospital admission rates for asthma. Pediatrics 120, 734740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Kohler, M, Lushington, K, Couper, R et al. (2008) Obesity and risk of sleep related upper airway obstruction in Caucasian children. J Clin Sleep Med 4, 129136.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Shrewsbury, V & Wardle, J (2008) Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990–2005. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16, 275284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Ong, KK, Emmett, PM, Noble, S et al. (2006) Dietary energy intake at the age of 4 months predicts postnatal weight gain and childhood body mass index. Pediatrics 117, E503E508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Stettler, N, Bovet, P, Shamlaye, H et al. (2002) Prevalence and risk factors for overweight and obesity in children from Seychelles, a country in rapid transition: the importance of early growth. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26, 214219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Stettler, N, Stallings, VA, Troxel, AB et al. (2005) Weight gain in the first week of life and overweight in adulthood: a cohort study of European American subjects fed infant formula. Circulation 111, 18971903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Stettler, N, Zemel, BS, Kumanyika, S et al. (2002) Infant weight gain and childhood overweight status in a multicenter, cohort study. Pediatrics 109, 194199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Gartner, LM, Morton, J, Lawrence, RA et al. ; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding (2005) Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 115, 496506.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Briefel, RR, Reidy, K, Karwe, V et al. (2004) Feeding infants and toddlers study: improvements needed in meeting infant feeding recommendations. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 1 Suppl. 1, S31S37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Jacknowitz, A, Novillo, D & Tiehen, L (2007) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children and infant feeding practices. Pediatrics 119, 281289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Zehle, K, Wen, LM, Orr, N & et al. (2007) ‘It’s not an issue at the moment’: a qualitative study of mothers about childhood obesity. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 32, 3641.Google Scholar
19.Arora, S, McJunkin, C, Wehrer, J et al. (2000) Major factors influencing breastfeeding rates: mother’s perception of father’s attitude and milk supply. Pediatrics 106, E67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Giugliani, ER, Caiaffa, WT, Vogelhut, J et al. (1994) Effect of breastfeeding support from different sources on mothers’ decisions to breastfeed. J Hum Lact 10, 157161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Freed, GL, Fraley, JK & Schanler, RJ (1992) Attitudes of expectant fathers regarding breast-feeding. Pediatrics 90, 224227.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Wolfberg, AJ, Michels, KB, Shields, W et al. (2004) Dads as breastfeeding advocates: results from a randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191, 708712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Patton, MQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
24.Guest, G, Bunce, A & Johnson, L (2006) How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18, 5982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Miles, M & Huberman, A (editors) (1994) An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
26.David, M & Sutton, CD (2004) Social Research: The Basics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
27.Jacelon, CS & O’Dell, KK (2005) Analyzing qualitative data. Urol Nurs 25, 217220.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Gavin, LE, Black, MM, Minor, S et al. (2002) Young, disadvantaged fathers’ involvement with their infants: an ecological perspective. J Adolesc Health 3, 266276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Anderson, AS, Guthrie, CA, Alder, EM et al. (2001) Rattling the plate – reasons and rationales for early weaning. Health Educ Res 16, 471479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Heinig, MJ, Follett, JR, Ishii, KD et al. (2006) Barriers to compliance with infant-feeding recommendations among low-income women. J Hum Lact 22, 2738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Habibi, M, Anderson, K, Spence, M et al. (2008) Well-fed and sleeping. Motivations driving infant feeding practices in rural Appalachia. FASEB J 22, 452.3.Google Scholar
32.Premberg, A, Hellstrom, AL & Berg, M (2008) Experiences of the first year as father. Scand J Caring Sci 22, 5663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.St John, W, Cameron, C & McVeigh, C (2005) Meeting the challenge of new fatherhood during the early weeks. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 34, 180189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Goodman, JH (2005) Becoming an involved father of an infant. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 34, 190200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Bell, L, Goulet, C, St-Cyr Tribble, D et al. (2007) Mothers’ and fathers’ views of the interdependence of their relationships with their infant: a systems perspective on early family relationships. J Fam Nurs 13, 179200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Bramhagen, AC, Axelsson, I & Hallstrom, I (2006) Mothers’ experiences of feeding situations – an interview study. J Clin Nurs 15, 2934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Barclay, L & Lupton, D (1999) The experiences of new fatherhood: a socio-cultural analysis. J Adv Nurs 29, 10131020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Caspi, A, Taylor, A, Smart, M et al. (2002) Can women provide reliable information about their children’s fathers? Cross-informant agreement about men’s antisocial behaviour. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42, 915920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Mitchell, SJ, See, HM, Tarkow, AK et al. (2007) Conducting studies with fathers: challenges and opportunities. Appl Dev Sci 11, 239244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Baughcum, AE, Burklow, KA, Deeks, CM et al. (1998) Maternal feeding practices and childhood obesity – a focus group study of low-income mothers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152, 10101014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Heinig, MJ, Follett, JR, Ishii, KD et al. (2006) Barriers to compliance with infant-feeding recommendations among low-income women. J Hum Lact 22, 2738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Horodynski, M, Olson, B, Arndt, MJ et al. (2007) Low-income mothers’ decisions regarding when and why to introduce solid foods to their infants: influencing factors. J Community Health Nurs 24, 101118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Sacco, LM, Bentley, ME, Carby-Shields, K et al. (2007) Assessment of infant feeding styles among low-income African-American mothers: comparing reported and observed behaviors. Appetite 49, 131140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Spear, HJ (2006) Breastfeeding behaviors and experiences of adolescent mothers. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 31, 106113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Wagner, CL & Wagner, MT (1999) The breast or the bottle? Determinants of infant feeding behaviors. Clin Perinatol 26, 505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Content areas (1–6) and questions from interview script for low-income fathers

Figure 1

Table 2 Recruitment venues of screened women (mothers of WIC income-eligible infants) and participants (male caregivers, who were fathers or partners of the mothers), rural East Tennessee

Figure 2

Table 3 Reasons for ineligibility and refusal to participate among the screened women (mothers of WIC income-eligible infants) and participants (male caregivers, who were fathers or partners of the mothers), rural East Tennessee

Figure 3

Table 4 Characteristics of the participating low-income fathers: male caregivers, who were fathers or partners of the mothers of WIC income-eligible infants residing in two rural East Tennessee counties

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Conceptual model depicting the relationship of fathers’ perceptions, roles and control with regard to infant feeding

You have Access
13
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Roles, perceptions and control of infant feeding among low-income fathers
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Roles, perceptions and control of infant feeding among low-income fathers
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Roles, perceptions and control of infant feeding among low-income fathers
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *