Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Exploring beliefs about dietary supplement use: focus group discussions with Dutch adults

  • Emília Margit Pajor (a1), Anke Oenema (a1), Sander Matthijs Eggers (a1) and Hein de Vries (a1)

Abstract

Objective

Although dietary supplement use is increasing in Europe and the USA, little research involving adults’ beliefs regarding dietary supplements has been conducted. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore and compare users’ and non-users’ beliefs towards dietary supplements.

Design

Thirteen focus group discussions were conducted of which seven groups were dietary supplement users and six groups were non-users. Based on the socio-cognitive factors of the Integrated Change Model, a semi-structured topic guide was set up. The discussions were audio-recorded and subjected to qualitative content analysis, applying the framework approach.

Setting

Data were collected in Maastricht, the Netherlands, in 2014 and 2015.

Subjects

In total fifty-six individuals participated in the study, of whom twenty-eight were dietary supplement users and twenty-eight non-users. The average age of participants was 42·9 years.

Results

Dietary supplement users’ attitude beliefs were mainly related to mental and physical health enhancement, illness prevention and curative health benefits. Users were critical of the nutritional knowledge of health professionals and of the quality of food products. Non-users were convinced that the human body does not need any support and that regular food is enough to cover one’s nutritional needs. Users and non-users held comparable beliefs regarding the definition and risks of dietary supplements, and perceived social influences.

Conclusions

In their decision about dietary supplement use, both groups were guided by their own convictions to a great extent. Both groups would benefit from improved understanding of the health effects of dietary supplements to improve informed decision making.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Exploring beliefs about dietary supplement use: focus group discussions with Dutch adults
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Exploring beliefs about dietary supplement use: focus group discussions with Dutch adults
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Exploring beliefs about dietary supplement use: focus group discussions with Dutch adults
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

* Corresponding author: Email e.pajor@maastrichtuniversity.nl

References

Hide All
1. Bailey, RL, Gahche, JJ, Thomas, PR et al. (2013) Why US children use dietary supplements. Pediatr Res 74, 737741.
2. Skeie, G, Braaten, T, Hjartåker, A et al. (2009) Use of dietary supplements in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition calibration study. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, Suppl. 4, S226S238.
3. Briefel, RR & Johnson, CL (2004) Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr 24, 401431.
4. Van Rossum, C, Fransen, H, Verkaik-Kloosterman, J et al. (2011) Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007–2010: Diet of Children and Adults Aged 7 to 69 Years. RIVM report no. 350050006/2011. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; available at http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/350050006.pdf
5. Health Council of the Netherlands (2015) Dutch Dietary Guidelines 2015. Advisory Report no. 2015/26E. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands; available at https://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/201524edutch_dietary_guidelines_2015.pdf
6. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health (2015) Multivitamin/mineral supplements. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/MVMS-HealthProfessional/ (accessed May 2015).
7. Harrison, R, Holt, D, Pattison, D et al. (2004) Are those in need taking dietary supplements? A survey of 21 923 adults. Br J Nutr 91, 617623.
8. Okleshen Peters, CL, Shelton, J & Sharma, P (2004) An investigation of factors that influence the consumption of dietary supplements. Health Mark Q 21, 113135.
9. De Jong, N, Ocke, MC, Branderhorst, HA et al. (2003) Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of functional food consumers and dietary supplement users. Br J Nutr 89, 273281.
10. Greger, JL (2001) Dietary supplement use: consumer characteristics and interests. J Nutr 131, 4 Suppl., 1339S1343S.
11. Kirk, SF, Cade, JE, Barrett, JH et al. (1999) Diet and lifestyle characteristics associated with dietary supplement use in women. Public Health Nutr 2, 6973.
12. Bailey, RL, Gahche, JJ, Lentino, CV et al. (2011) Dietary supplement use in the United States, 2003–2006. J Nutr 141, 261266.
13. Blendon, RJ, DesRoches, CM, Benson, JM et al. (2001) Americans’ views on the use and regulation of dietary supplements. Arch Intern Med 161, 805810.
14. Conner, M, Kirk, SF, Cade, JE et al. (2001) Why do women use dietary supplements? The use of the theory of planned behaviour to explore beliefs about their use. Soc Sci Med 52, 621633.
15. Marinac, JS, Buchinger, CL, Godfrey, LA et al. (2007) Herbal products and dietary supplements: a survey of use, attitudes, and knowledge among older adults. J Am Osteopath Assoc 107, 1323.
16. Rozga, MR, Stern, JS, Stanhope, K et al. (2013) Dietary supplement users vary in attitudes and sources of dietary supplement information in East and West geographic regions: a cross-sectional study. BMC Complement Altern Med 13, 1.
17. Nichter, M & Thompson, JJ (2006) For my wellness, not just my illness: North Americans’ use of dietary supplements. Cult Med Psychiatry 30, 175222.
18. Conner, M, Kirk, SF, Cade, JE et al. (2003) Environmental influences: factors influencing a woman’s decision to use dietary supplements. J Nutr 133, issue 6, 1978S1982S.
19. Rehaag, R, Tils, G, Röder, B et al. (2013) Zielgruppengerechte Risikokommunikation zum Thema Nahrungsergänzungsmittel. Abschlussbericht. Berlin: Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung; available at http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/350/zielgruppengerechte-risikokommunikation-zum-thema-nahrungsergaenzungsmittel.pdf
20. De Vries, H, Mudde, A, Leijs, I et al. (2003) The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (EFSA): an example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res 18, 611626.
21. van der Wulp, NY, Hoving, C & de Vries, H (2013) A qualitative investigation of alcohol use advice during pregnancy: experiences of Dutch midwives, pregnant women and their partners. Midwifery 29, e89e98.
22. Jander, A, Mercken, L, Crutzen, R & de Vries, H (2013) Determinants of binge drinking in a permissive environment: focus group interviews with Dutch adolescents and parents. BMC Public Health 13, 1.
23. de Vries, H, Mesters, I, Van de Steeg, H et al. (2005) The general public’s information needs and perceptions regarding hereditary cancer: an application of the Integrated Change Model. Patient Educ Couns 56, 154165.
24. Stewart, DW & Shamdasani, PN (2014) Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
25. Rabiee, F (2004) Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc 63, 655–560.
26. Hijmans, E (1996) The logic of qualitative media content analysis: a typology. Communications 21, 93108.
27. Glaser, BG & Strauss, AL (2009) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Transaction Publishers.
28. Krueger, RA & Casey, MA (2014) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
29. Francis, JJ, Johnston, M, Robertson, C et al. (2010) What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health 25, 12291245.
30. Van Teijlingen, E & Hundley, V (2002) The importance of pilot studies. Nurs Stand 16, 3336.
31. Ritchie, J & Spencer, L (2002) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Qual Res Comp 573, 305329.
32. Lacey, A & Luff, D (2009) Qualitative Data Analysis. Nottingham/Sheffield: The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service for the East Midlands/The NIHR Research Design Service for Yorkshire & the Humber; available at https://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/9_Qualitative_Data_Analysis_Revision_2009.pdf
33. Elo, S & Kyngäs, H (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 62, 107115.
34. Brownie, S & Rolfe, M (2005) Supplement utilisation patterns of older Australians: results from a randomly selected national sample. Nutr Diet 62, 8994.
35. Bailey, RL, Fulgoni, VL, Keast, DR et al. (2011) Dietary supplement use is associated with higher intakes of minerals from food sources. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 13761381.
36. Higgins, ET (2002) How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. J Consum Psychol 12, 177191.
37. Rotter, JB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr 80, 128.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Pajor supplementary material
Supplementary Table

 Word (14 KB)
14 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed