Skip to main content Accessibility help

Development and testing of the FRESH Foods Survey to assess food pantry clients’ dietary behaviours and correlates

  • Eric E Calloway (a1), Hilary K Seligman (a2), Lisa W Boyd (a1), Katie L Stern (a1), Sophie Rosenmoss (a2) and Amy L Yaroch (a1)...



To use cognitive interviewing and pilot testing to develop a survey instrument feasible for administering in the food pantry setting to assess daily intake frequency from several major food groups and dietary correlates (e.g. fruit and vegetable barriers) – the FRESH Foods Survey.


New and existing survey items were adapted and refined following cognitive interviews. After piloting the survey with food pantry users in the USA, preliminary psychometric and construct validity analyses were performed.


Three US food banks and accompanying food pantries in Atlanta, GA, San Diego, CA, and Buffalo, NY.


Food pantry clients (n 246), mostly female (68 %), mean age 54·5 (sd 14·7) years.


Measures of dietary correlates performed well psychometrically: Cronbach’s α range 0·71–0·90, slope (α) parameter range 1·26–6·36, and threshold parameters (β) indicated variability in the ‘difficulty’ of the items. Additionally, all scales had only one eigenvalue above 1·0 (range 2·07–4·71), indicating unidimensionality. Average (median, Q1–Q3) daily intakes (times/d) across six dietary groups were: fruits and vegetables (2·87, 1·87–4·58); junk foods (1·16, 0·58–2·16); fast foods and similar entrées (1·45, 0·58–2·03); whole-grain foods (0·87, 0·58–1·71); sugar-sweetened beverages (0·58, 0·29–1·29); milk and milk alternatives (0·71, 0·29–1·29). Significant correlations between dietary groups and dietary correlates were largely in the directions expected based on the literature, giving initial indication of convergent and discriminant validity.


The FRESH Foods Survey is efficient, tailored to food pantry populations, can be used to monitor dietary behaviours and may be useful to measure intervention impact.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email


Hide All
1. Coleman-Jensen, A, Rabbitt, MP, Gregory, CA et al. (2017) Household Food Security in the United States in 2016. Economic Research Report No. ERR-237. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
2. Seligman, HK, Laraia, BA & Kushel, MB (2010) Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants. J Nutr 140, 304310.
3. Gundersen, C & Ziliak, JP (2015) Food insecurity and health outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood) 34, 18301839.
4. Simmet, A, Depa, J, Tinnemann, P et al. (2017) The dietary quality of food pantry users: a systematic review of existing literature. J Acad Nutr Diet 117, 563576.
5. Weinfield, NS, Mills, G, Borger, C et al. (2014) Hunger in America 2014: National Report Prepared for Feeding America. Washington, DC: Westat and the Urban Institute.
6. Dinour, LM, Bergen, D & Yeh, MC (2007) The food insecurity–obesity paradox: a review of the literature and the role food stamps may play. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 19521961.
7. Nicholson, LM, Schwirian, PM, Klein, EG et al. (2011) Recruitment and retention strategies in longitudinal clinical studies with low-income populations. Contemp Clin Trials 32, 353362.
8. Kicinski, LR (2012) Characteristics of short and long-term food pantry users. Michigan Sociol Rev 26, 5874.
9. Kirkpatrick, SI, Reedy, J, Butler, EN et al. (2014) Dietary assessment in food environment research: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 46, 94102.
10. Nebeling, LC, Hennessy, E, Oh, AY et al. (2017) The FLASHE study: survey development, dyadic perspectives, and participant characteristics. Am J Prev Med 52, 839848.
11. Erinosho, TO, Pinard, CA, Nebeling, LC et al. (2015) Development and implementation of the National Cancer Institute’s Food Attitudes and Behaviors Survey to assess correlates of fruit and vegetable intake in adults. PLoS One 10, e0115017.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics (2009–2010) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Dietary Screener Questionnaire. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; available at
13. Gordon, W (2005) Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
14. Kushi, LH, Byers, T, Doyle, C et al. (2012) American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin 62, 3067.
15. World Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and The Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: AICR.
16. US Department of Health and Human Services & US Department of Agriculture (2015) Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Washington, DC: USDHHS and USDA; available at
17. Park, S & Pan, LA (n.d.) Data User’s Guide to the BRFSS Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Questions: How to Analyze Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. Atlanta, GA: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; available at
18. Montoye, AH, Pfeiffer, KA, Alaimo, K et al. (2013) Junk food consumption and screen time: association with childhood adiposity. Am J Health Behav 37, 395403.
19. Perrine, CG, Galuska, DA, Thompson, FE et al. (2014) Breastfeeding duration is associated with child diet at 6 years. Pediatrics 134, Suppl. 1, S50S55.
20. Thompson, FE, Kipnis, V, Midthune, D et al. (2008) Performance of a food-frequency questionnaire in the us NIH–AARP (National Institutes of Health–American Association of Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study. Public Health Nutr 11, 183195.
21. Edelen, MO & Reeve, BB (2007) Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res 16, 518.
22. Yaroch, AL, Byker, C, Pinard, CA et al. (2012) Advances in methodologies for assessing dietary intake and physical activity among adolescents. Adolesc Med State Art Rev 23, 610630.
23. Thompson, FE & Byers, T (1994) Dietary assessment resource manual. J Nutr 124, 11 Suppl., S2245S2317.
24. Magarey, A, Watson, J, Golley, RK et al. (2011) Assessing dietary intake in children and adolescents: considerations and recommendations for obesity research. Int J Pediatr Obes 6, 211.
25. Garcia, MT, Sato, PM, Trude, AC et al. (2018) Factors associated with home meal preparation and fast-food sources use among low-income urban African American adults. Ecol Food Nutr 57, 1331.
26. Van Duyn, MA, Kristal, AR, Dodd, K et al. (2001) Association of awareness, intrapersonal and interpersonal factors, and stage of dietary change with fruit and vegetable consumption: a national survey. Am J Health Promot 16, 6978.
27. Shaikh, AR, Yaroch, AL, Nebeling, L et al. (2008) Psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption in adults: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 34, 535543.
28. Kelly, S, Martin, S, Kuhn, I et al. (2016) Barriers and facilitators to the uptake and maintenance of healthy behaviours by people at mid-life: a rapid systematic review. PLoS One 11, e0145074.
29. Boutelle, KN, Fulkerson, JA, Neumark-Sztainer, D et al. (2007) Fast food for family meals: relationships with parent and adolescent food intake, home food availability and weight status. Public Health Nutr 10, 1623.
30. Trapp, GS, Hickling, S, Christian, HE et al. (2015) Individual, social, and environmental correlates of healthy and unhealthy eating. Health Educ Behav 42, 759768.
31. Caspi, CE, Kawachi, I, Subramanian, SV et al. (2012) The relationship between diet and perceived and objective access to supermarkets among low-income housing residents. Soc Sci Med 75, 12541262.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Calloway et al. supplementary material
Calloway et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (225 KB)
225 KB

Development and testing of the FRESH Foods Survey to assess food pantry clients’ dietary behaviours and correlates

  • Eric E Calloway (a1), Hilary K Seligman (a2), Lisa W Boyd (a1), Katie L Stern (a1), Sophie Rosenmoss (a2) and Amy L Yaroch (a1)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed