Slow event-related potentials (ERP) were examined in healthy
and aphasic subjects in two-stimulus designs comprising a word
comprehension and a rhyming task. Aphasics, though selected
to perform above chance level, made significantly more errors
and responded more slowly than controls, although canonical
correlations did not indicate a statistical relationship between
performance measures and ERP amplitudes. A discriminant analysis
of ERP amplitudes distinguished the groups for the slow wave
(SW; 0.5–1.0 s post-S1 onset) in the word comprehension,
for the SW and the initial contingent negative variation (iCNV;
1.0–2.0 s post-S1 onset) in the rhyming task. Similarly
for both tasks, ERP topography showed left-anterior predominance
of the negative SW and iCNV in controls, whereas participants
with aphasia showed smaller anterior and larger left-posterior
amplitudes. The centroparietal terminal CNV (tCNV; 1 s pre-S2)
was smaller in participants with aphasia than in controls, but
similar in topography. Results suggest left-anterior activation
for those language processes that were presumably provoked in
the present tasks, like lexical access, or phonological encoding.
The pattern of participants with aphasia may indicate effects
of language impairment and recovery, but also consequences of
the brain damage.