Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T22:26:44.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shells and Sherds: Identification of Inclusions in Grooved Ware, with Associated Radiocarbon Dates, from Amesbury, Wiltshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Rosamund M. J. Cleal
Affiliation:
Wessex Archaeology, Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 6EB
John Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London
David Williams
Affiliation:
English Heritage Ceramic Petrology Project, Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton

Abstract

This note reports the results of three radiocarbon determinations on material from two pits in Amesbury parish, one of which, Chalk Plaque Pit, has been published in this journal (Harding 1988). The other pit, at Ratfyn, Amesbury, was excavated in the 1930s and published by Stone (1935). As part of the same research project the shell inclusions in Grooved Ware from these features, and from a similar feature at Woodlands (Stone & Young 1948; Stone 1949), were identified and the presence of glauconite in Grooved Ware from the area established.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

British Geological Survey. 1979. Ten Mile Map South Sheet (Solid), 3rd edn.Google Scholar
Cleal, R. M. J., & Allen, M. J. 1994. Investigation of treedamaged barrows on King Barrow Ridge and Luxenborough Plantation, Amesbury. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 87, 5484.Google Scholar
Finch, L. A. 1971. Report on the petrological examination of sherds from Durrington Walls. In Wainwright, G. J. & Longworth, I. H. 1971, 409410.Google Scholar
Harding, P. 1988. The Chalk Plaque Pit, Amesbury. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 54, 320327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, R. E. M., Housley, R. A., Bronk Ramsey, C., & van Klinken, G. J. 1993. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 17. Archaeometry 35.2, 305326.Google Scholar
Limbrey, S. 1973. Report on the soils. In G. Smith, Excavation of the Stonehenge Avenue at West Amesbury, Wiltshire, 55, Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 68, 4256.Google Scholar
Melville, R. V., & Freshney, E. C. 1982. The Hampshire Basin and Adjoining Areas. British Regional Geology. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. W., & Stuiver, M. 1986. High precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500–2500 BC, in Stuiver, M. and Kra, R.S. (eds), 1986, 839862.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. W., Pilcher, J. R., Baillie, M. G., Corbett, D. M., & Qua, F. 1986 High precision 14C measurement of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from AD 1840–5210 BC, in Stuiver, M. & Kra, R. S. (eds), 1986, 911934.Google Scholar
Plicht, J. van der & Mook, W. G. 1989. Calibration of radiocarbon dates by computer. Radiocarbon 31.3, 805816.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. 1990 The Stonehenge Environs Project. London: English Heritage Monograph 16.Google Scholar
Stone, J. F. S. 1935. Some discoveries at Ratfyn, Amesbury and their bearing on the date of Woodhenge. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 47, 5567.Google Scholar
Stone, J. F. S. 1949. Some Grooved Ware pottery from the Woodhenge area. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 15, 122127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, J. F. S., & Young, W. E. V. 1948. Two pits of Grooved Ware date near Woodhenge. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 52, 287306.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., & Kra, R. S. 1986. Proceedings of the 12th International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim, Norway, Radiocarbon 28.2B.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J. & Longworth, I. H. 1971. Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966–1968. London: Report of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 29.Google Scholar