Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?*

  • G. P. Faulkner (a1), L. K. Pourshahidi (a1), J. M. W. Wallace (a1), M. A. Kerr (a1), T. A. McCrorie (a1) and M. B. E. Livingstone (a1)...

Abstract

Larger portion sizes (PS) may be inciting over-eating and contributing to obesity rates. Currently, there is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of serving size (SS) guidance. The aims of the present review are to evaluate SS guidance; the understanding, usability and acceptability of such guidance, its impact on consumers and potential barriers to its uptake. A sample of worldwide SS guidance schemes (n 87) were identified using targeted and untargeted searches, overall these were found to communicate various inconsistent and often conflicting messages about PS selection. The available data suggest that consumers have difficulty in understanding terms such as ‘portion size’ and ‘serving size’, as these tend to be used interchangeably. In addition, discrepancies between recommended SS and those present on food labels add to the confusion. Consumers generally understand and visualise SS best when expressed in terms of household measures rather than actual weights. Only a limited number of studies have examined the direct impact of SS guidance on consumer behaviour with equivocal results. Although consumers recognise that guidance on selecting SS would be helpful, they are often unwilling to act on such guidance. The challenge of achieving consumer adherence to SS guidance is formidable due to several barriers including chronic exposure to larger PS, distorted consumption norms and perceptions, the habit of ‘cleaning one's plate’ and language barriers for ethnic minorities. In conclusion, the impact of SS guidance on consumers merits further investigation to ensure that future guidance resonates with consumers by being more understandable, usable and acceptable.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?*
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?*
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?*
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author: Professor Barbara Livingstone, fax +44 2870 124471, email mbe.livingstone@ulster.ac.uk

Footnotes

Hide All
*

The authors dedicate this article to the memory of their colleague Professor Julie Wallace (7 April 1971–7 February 2012).

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. House of Commons Health Committee (2001) Tackling Obesity in England. London: The Stationery Office.
2. The NHS Information Centre (2010) Health Survey for England – 2009: Health and Lifestyles. Leeds, UK: The Health and Social Care Information Centre.
3. Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance (2011) National Adult Nutritional Survey – Summary Report on Food and Nutrient Intakes, Physical Measurements, Physical Activity Patterns and Food Choice Motives. Ireland: IUNA.
4. Wang, CY, McPherson, K, Marsh, T et al. (2011) Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet 378, 815825.
5. Nielsen, SJ & Popkin, BM (2003) Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977–1998. JAMA 289, 450453.
6. Smiciklas-Wright, H, Mitchell, DC, Mickle, SJ et al. (2003) Foods commonly eaten in the United States, 1989–1991 and 1994–1996: are portion sizes changing? J Am Diet Assoc 103, 4147.
7. Ello-Martin, JA, Ledikwe, JH & Rolls, BJ (2005) The influence of food portion size and energy density on energy intake: implications for weight management. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 236S241S.
8. Young, LR & Nestle, M (2002) The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic. Am J Public Health 92, 246249.
9. Condrasky, M, Ledikwe, JH, Flood, JE et al. (2007) Chefs’ opinions of restaurant portion sizes. Obesity 15, 20862094.
10. Matthiessen, J, Fagt, S, Biltoft-Jensen, A et al. (2003) Size makes a difference. Public Health Nutr 6, 6572.
11. Rolls, B, Roe, L & Meengs, J (2006) Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 543549.
12. Schusdziarra, V, Hausmann, M, Wittke, C et al. (2010) Contribution of energy density and food quantity to short-term fluctuations of energy intake in normal weight and obese subjects. Eur J Nutr 49, 3743.
13. Japur, CC & Diez-Garcia, RW (2010) Food energy content influences food portion size estimation by nutrition students. J Hum Nutr Diet 23, 272276.
14. Kral, T, Roe, L & Rolls, B (2004) Combined effects of energy density and portion size on energy intake in women. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 962968.
15. Piernas, C & Popkin, BM (2011) Increased portion sizes from energy-dense foods affect total energy intake at eating occasions in US children and adolescents: patterns and trends by age group and sociodemographic characteristics, 1977–2006. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 13241332.
16. Burger, KS, Kern, M & Coleman, KJ (2007) Characteristics of self-selected portion size in young adults. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 611618.
17. Berg, C, Lappas, G, Wolk, A et al. (2009) Eating patterns and portion size associated with obesity in a Swedish population. Appetite 52, 2126.
18. Kelly, MT, Rennie, KL, Wallace, JMW et al. (2009) Associations between the portion sizes of food groups consumed and measures of adiposity in the British National Diet and Nutrition Survey. Br J Nutr 101, 14131420.
19. Burger, KS, Fisher, JO & Johnson, SL (2011) Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: visibility and bite size. Obesity 19, 546551.
20. Steenhuis, IHM, Leeuwis, FH & Vermeer, WM (2010) Small, medium, large or supersize: trends in food portion sizes in The Netherlands. Public Health Nutr 13, 852857.
21. Young, LR & Nestle, M (2007) Portion sizes and obesity: responses of fast-food companies. J Public Health Policy 28, 238248.
22. Wrieden, WL, Gregor, A & Barton, K (2008) Have food portion sizes in the UK increased over the past 20 years? Proc Nutr Soc 67, E211.
23. Benson, C (2009) Increasing portion size in Britain. Soc Biol Hum Aff 74, 420.
24. Church, S (2008) Trends in Portion Sizes in the UK – A Preliminary Review of Published Information. London, UK: Food Standards Agency.
25. Driskell, JA, Meckna, BR & Scales, NE (2006) Differences exist in the eating habits of university men and women at fast-food restaurants. Nutr Res 26, 524530.
26. Vermeer, WM, Steenhuis, IHM & Seidell, JC (2010) Portion size: a qualitative study of consumers’ attitudes toward point-of-purchase interventions aimed at portion size. Health Educ Res 25, 109120.
27. Rolls, BJ, Roe, LS, Kral, TVE et al. (2004) Increasing the portion size of a packaged snack increases energy intake in men and women. Appetite 42, 6369.
28. Raynor, HA & Wing, RR (2007) Package unit size and amount of food: do both influence intake? Obesity 15, 23112319.
29. Flood, JE, Roe, LS & Rolls, BJ (2006) The effect of increased beverage portion size on energy intake at a meal. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 19841990.
30. Rolls, BJ, Roe, LS, Meengs, JS et al. (2004) Increasing the portion size of a sandwich increases energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 367372.
31. Rolls, BJ, Morris, EL & Roe, LS (2002) Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 12071213.
32. Levitsky, DA & Youn, T (2004) The more food young adults are served, the more they overeat. J Nutr 134, 25462549.
33. Diliberti, N, Bordi, PL, Conklin, MT et al. (2004) Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res 12, 562568.
34. Wansink, B & Kim, J (2005) Bad popcorn in big buckets: portion size can influence intake as much as taste. J Nutr Educ Behav 37, 242245.
35. Jeffery, RW, Rydell, S, Dunn, CL et al. (2007) Effects of portion size on chronic energy intake. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4, 27.
36. Rolls, BJ, Roe, LS & Meengs, JS (2007) The effect of large portion sizes on energy intake is sustained for 11 days. Obesity 15, 15351543.
37. Kelly, MT, Wallace, JMW, Robson, PJ et al. (2009) Increased portion size leads to a sustained increase in energy intake over 4d in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Br J Nutr 102, 470477.
38. Freedman, MR & Brochado, C (2010) Reducing portion size reduces food intake and plate waste. Obesity 18, 18641866.
39. Rolls, BJ, Roe, LS & Meengs, JS (2006) Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 1117.
40. Marchiori, D, Waroquier, L & Klein, O (2011) Smaller food item sizes of snack foods influence reduced portions and caloric intake in young adults. J Am Diet Assoc 111, 727731.
41. Raynor, HA, Van Walleghen, EL, Niemeier, H et al. (2009) Do food provisions packaged in single-servings reduce energy intake at breakfast during a brief behavioral weight-loss intervention? J Am Diet Assoc 109, 19221925.
42. Stroebele, N, Ogden, LG & Hill, JO (2009) Do calorie-controlled portion sizes of snacks reduce energy intake? Appetite 52, 793796.
43. Wansink, B, Payne, CR & Shimizu, M (2011) The 100-calorie semi-solution: sub-packaging most reduces intake among the heaviest. Obesity 19, 10981100.
44. The British Dietetic Association (2007) Dietitians Hail Return of Balanced Diet Plate. Birmingham, UK: The British Dietetic Association.
45. Food Standards Agency (2007) The Eatwell Plate. London, UK: Food Standards Agency.
46. Health Canada (2007) Eating Well with Canada's Food Guide. Canada: Health Canada.
47. Young, LR & Nestle, M (2003) Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 231234.
48. Anderson, AS, Barton, K, Craigie, A et al. (2008) Exploration of Adult Food Portion Size Tools. Edinburgh, UK: NHS Health Scotland.
49. Flynn, MAT, O'Brien, CM, Faulkner, G et al. (2012) Revision of food-based dietary guidelines for Ireland, phase 1: evaluation of Ireland's food guide. Public Health Nutr 15, 518526.
50. Britten, P, Haven, J & Davis, C (2006) Consumer research for development of educational messages for the MyPyramid food guidance system. J Nutr Educ Behav 38, S108S123.
51. Brogden, N & Almiron-Roig, E (2011) Estimated portion sizes of snacks and beverages differ from reference amounts and are affected by appetite status in non-obese men. Public Health Nutr 14, 17431751.
52. Institute of Grocery Distribution (2008) Portion Size: a Review of Existing Approaches. England: Institute of Grocery Distribution.
53. Brown, KA, Timotijevic, L, Barnett, J et al. (2011) A review of consumer awareness, understanding and use of food-based dietary guidelines. Br J Nutr 106, 1526.
54. QSR International Pty Ltd (2010) NVivo qualitative data analysis software, version 9. Southport, UK: QSR International Pty Ltd.
55. Nutrition and Health Foundation (2011) Food Pyramid. http://www.nutritionandhealth.ie/Sectors/NHF/NHF.nsf/vPages/Eat_Smart∼food-pyramid?OpenDocument (accessed October 2011).
56. U.S. Department of Agriculture Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (2005) My Pyramid – Steps to a Healthier You. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
57. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2011) ChooseMyPlate.gov website. http://www.choosemyplate.gov/index.html (accessed May 2011).
58. U.S. Department of Agriculture & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
59. Food Standards Agency (2002) Food Portion Sizes, 3rd ed. London: TSO.
60. World Cancer Research Fund (2011) Portion size: finding the balance for cancer prevention. http://www.wcrf-uk.org/PDFs/Portion-Size-finding-the-balance.pdf (accessed December 2011).
61. Grunert, KG & Wills, JM (2007) A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 15, 385399.
62. Pollard, CM, Daly, AM & Binns, CW (2008) Consumer perceptions of fruit and vegetables serving sizes. Public Health Nutr 12, 637643.
63. Institute of Grocery Distribution (2009) Portion Size Communication in Therapeutic Practice: a Survey of Dietitians and Nutritionists. England: Institute of Grocery Distribution.
64. The International Life Sciences Institute (2004) National Food Based Dietary Guidelines: Experiences, Implications and Future Directions. Hungary: ILSI.
65. Hogbin, M, Shaw, A & Anand, RS (1999) Nutrition Insights: Food Portions and Servings how do they Differ? Insight 11. Washington, DC: USDA Centre for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
66. The Dietary Guidelines Alliance (2002) A Focus Group Study to Explore Consumer Attitudes Regarding Portion Management and Dietary Fat. Bethesda, MD: Shugoll Research.
67. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (2011) Portion Distortion. http://hp2010.nhlbihin.net/portion/keep.htm (accessed March 2011).
68. Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity (2006) Research to Practice Series No. 2: Portion Size. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
69. Schwartz, J & Byrd-Bredbenner, C (2006) Portion distortion: typical portion sizes selected by young adults. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 14121418.
70. Ueland, O, Cardello, AV, Merrill, EP et al. (2009) Effect of portion size information on food intake. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 124127.
71. European Food Information Council (2011) Large portions contribute to weight gain. http://www.eufic.org/page/en/show/latest-science-news/fftid/Large-portions-weight-gain/ (accessed October 2011).
72. Waitrose (2012) Portion sizes. http://www.waitrose.com/home/inspiration/health_and_nutrition/weight_loss/portion_sizes.html (accessed February 2012).
73. Institute of Grocery Distribution (2009) Portion Size: Understanding the Consumer Perspective. England: Institute of Grocery Distribution.
74. Williams, C (1995) Healthy eating: clarifying advice about fruit and vegetables. Br Med J 310, 14531455.
75. Young, LR & Nestle, M (1998) Variation in perceptions of a ‘medium’ food portion: implications for dietary guidance. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 458459.
76. Hogbin, M & Hess, M (1999) Public confusion over food portions and servings. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 12091211.
77. Brogden, N & Almiron-Roig, E (2010) Food liking, familiarity and expected satiation selectively influence portion size estimation of snacks and caloric beverages in men. Appetite 55, 551555.
78. Young, LR & Nestle, M (1995) Portion sizes in dietary assessment – issues and policy implications. Nutr Rev 53, 149158.
79. Shah, M, Adams-Huet, B, Elston, E et al. (2010) Food serving size knowledge in African American Women and the relationship with body mass index. J Nutr Educ Behav 42, 99105.
80. Rangan, AM, Schindeler, S, Hector, DJ et al. (2009) Assessment of typical food portion sizes consumed among Australian adults. Nutr Diet 66, 227233.
81. Flynn, MAT, O'Brien, CM, Ross, V et al. (2012) Revision of food-based dietary guidelines for Ireland, phase 2: recommendations for healthy eating and affordability. Public Health Nutr 15, 527537.
82. Smith, A, Kellett, E & Schmerlaib, Y (2003) The Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. Background Information for Nutrition Educators. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
83. Gans, KM, Risica, PM, Kirtania, U et al. (2009) Dietary behaviors and portion sizes of black women who enrolled in SisterTalk and variation by demographic characteristics. J Nutr Educ Behav 41, 3240.
84. Sharma, S, Cade, J, Landman, J et al. (2002) Assessing the diet of the British African-Caribbean population: frequency of consumption of foods and food portion sizes. Int J Food Sci Nutr 53, 439444.
85. Food Standards Agency (2007) Front of Pack Traffic Light Signpost Labelling – Technical Guidance Issue 2. London: Food Standards Agency.
86. British Market Research Bureau Qualitative (2010) Citizens' Forums on Food: Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling. London: Food Standard's Agency.
87. Ashfield-Watt, P (2006) Fruits and vegetables, 5 + a day: are we getting the message across? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 15, 245252.
88. Ayala, G (2006) An experimental evaluation of a group-versus computer-based intervention to improve food portion size estimation skills. Health Educ Res 21, 133145.
89. Bolland, JE, Yuhas, JA & Bolland, TW (1988) Estimation of food portion sizes: effectiveness of training. J Am Diet Assoc 88, 817.
90. Yuhas, JA, Bolland, JE & Bolland, TW (1989) The impact of training, food type, gender and container size on the estimation of food portion sizes. J Am Diet Assoc 89, 14731477.
91. Weber, JL, Tinsley, AM, Houtkooper, LB et al. (1997) Multimethod training increases portion-size estimation accuracy. J Am Diet Assoc 97, 176179.
92. Brown, L & Oler, C (2000) A food display assignment and handling food models improves accuracy of college students’ estimates of food portions. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 10631065.
93. Venter, CS, MacIntyre, UE & Vorster, HH (2000) The development and testing of a food portion photograph book for use in an African population. J Hum Nutr Diet 13, 205218.
94. Byrd-Bredbenner, C & Schwartz, J (2004) The effect of practical portion size measurement aids on the accuracy of portion size estimates made by young adults. J Hum Nutr Diet 17, 351357.
95. Martin, CK, Anton, SD, York-Crowe, E et al. (2007) Empirical evaluation of the ability to learn a calorie counting system and estimate portion size and food intake. Br J Nutr 98, 439444.
96. Colapinto, CK & Malaviarachchi, D (2009) Paint your plate: effectiveness of a point-of-purchase display. Can J Diet Pract Res 70, 6671.
97. Ollberding, NJ, Wolf, RL & Contento, I (2010) Food label use and its relation to dietary intake among US adults. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 12331237.
98. Ashfield-Watt, PAL, Welch, AA, Day, NE et al. (2004) Is ‘five-a-day’’ an effective way of increasing fruit and vegetable intakes? Public Health Nutr 7, 257261.
99. Vermeer, WM, Steenhuis, IHM & Seidell, JC (2009) From the point-of-purchase perspective: a qualitative study of the feasibility of interventions aimed at portion-size. Health Policy 90, 7380.
100. Kothe, EJ & Mullan, BA (2011) Perceptions of fruit and vegetable dietary guidelines among Australian young adults. Nutr Diet 68, 262266.
101. Vermeer, WM, Steenhuis, IHM, Leeuwis, FH et al. (2011) View the label before you view the movie: a field experiment into the impact of portion size and Guideline Daily Amounts labelling on soft drinks in cinemas. BMC Public Health 11, 438.
102. Tavelli, S, Beerman, K, Shultz, J et al. (1998) Sources of error and nutritional adequacy of the Food Guide Pyramid. J Am Coll Health 47, 7782.
103. Riley, WT, Beasley, J, Sowell, A et al. (2007) Effects of a web-based food portion training program on food portion estimation. J Nutr Educ Behav 39, 7076.
104. Nayga, R & Capps, O (1999) US consumers’ perceptions of the importance of following the US dietary guidelines. Food Policy 24, 553564.
105. Hannum, S, Carson, L, Evans, E et al. (2004) Use of portion-controlled entrees enhances weight loss in women. Obes Res 12, 538546.
106. Hannum, S, Carson, L, Evans, E et al. (2006) Use of packaged entrees as part of a weight-loss diet in overweight men: an 8-week randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 8, 146155.
107. Pedersen, SD, Kang, J & Kline, GA (2007) Portion control plate for weight loss in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus – a controlled clinical trial. Arch Intern Med 167, 12771283.
108. Guthrie, J & Smallwood, D (2003) Evaluating the effects of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans on consumer behavior and health: methodological challenges. J Am Diet Assoc 103, S42S49.
109. Trubswasser, U & Branca, F (2009) Nutrition policy is taking shape in Europe. Public Health Nutr 12, 295306.
110. Wood, F, Robling, M, Prout, H et al. (2010) A question of balance: a qualitative study of mothers’ interpretations of dietary recommendations. Ann Fam Med 8, 5157.
111. Anderson, AS, Freeman, J, Stead, M et al. (2005) Consumer views on portion size guidance to assist adult dietary choices. J Hum Nutr Diet 21, 406.
112. Hunter, D, Sampson, L, Stampfer, M et al. (1988) Variability in portion sizes of commonly consumed foods among a population of women in the United-States. Am J Epidemiol 127, 12401249.
113. The European Food Information Council (2011) How Do Consumers Respond to Portion Information on Food and Drink Labels? Brussels: EUFIC.
114. Mian, SI & Brauer, PM (2009) Dietary education tools for south Asians with diabetes. Can J Diet Pract Res 70, 2835.
115. Carlton, D, Kicklighter, J, Jonnalagadda, S et al. (2000) Design, development, and formative evaluation of “Put Nutrition Into Practice,” a multimedia nutrition education program for adults. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 555563.
116. Cousineau, TM, Franko, DL, Ciccazzo, M et al. (2006) Web-based nutrition education for college students: is it feasible? Eval Program Plann 29, 2333.
117. Vermeer, WM, Alting, E, Steenhuis, IHM et al. (2010) Value for money or making the healthy choice: the impact of proportional pricing on consumers’ portion size choices. Eur J Public Health 20, 6569.
118. Watts, ML, Hager, MH, Toner, CD et al. (2011) The art of translating nutritional science into dietary guidance: history and evolution of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Nutr Rev 69, 404412.
119. Goldberg, JP & Sliwa, SA (2011) Session 4. Getting balanced nutrition messages across communicating actionable nutrition messages: challenges and opportunities. Proc Nutr Soc 70, 2637.
120. US Department of Agriculture (1992) Food Guide Pyramid. Washington, DC: USDA Centre for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
121. USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (2000) Serving sizes in the Food Guide Pyramid and on the Nutrition Facts Label: What's Different and Why? Washington, DC: USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
122. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2011) Code of Federal Regulations Title 21: Reference amounts customarily consumed per eating occasion. Sec. 101.12 Reference amounts customarily consumed per eating occasion. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=101.12 (accessed December 2011).
123. Walker, KZ, Woods, JL, Rickard, CA et al. (2008) Product variety in Australian snacks and drinks: how can the consumer make a healthy choice? Public Health Nutr 11, 10461053.
124. Cleanthous, X, Mackintosh, A & Anderson, S (2011) Comparison of reported nutrients and serve size between private label products and branded products in Australian supermarkets. Nutr Diet 68, 120126.
125. Food Safety Authority of Ireland (2011) Scientific Recommendations for Healthy Eating in Ireland. Dublin: Food Safety Authority of Ireland.
126. Ervin, R & Smiciklas-Wright, H (2001) Accuracy in estimating and recalling portion sizes of foods among elderly adults. Nutr Res 21, 703713.
127. Ovaskainen, M, Paturi, M, Reinivuo, H et al. (2008) Accuracy in the estimation of food servings against the portions in food photographs. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 674681.
128. Wrieden, WL & Momen, NC (2009) Workshop 3: novel approaches for estimating portion sizes. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, S80S81.
129. Cypel, YS, Guenther, PM & Petot, GJ (1997) Validity of portion-size measurement aids: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 97, 289292.
130. Wansink, B & Park, S (2001) At the movies: how external cues and perceived taste impact consumption volume. Food Qual Prefer 12, 6974.
131. Geier, AB, Rozin, P & Doros, G (2006) Unit bias – a new heuristic that helps explain the effect of portion size on food intake. Psychol Sci 17, 521525.
132. Vartanian, LR, Herman, CP & Wansink, B (2008) Are we aware of the external factors that influence our food intake? Health Psychol 27, 533538.
133. Wansink, B (2004) Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Annu Rev Nutr 24, 455479.
134. Koh, J & Pliner, P (2009) The effects of degree of acquaintance, plate size, and sharing on food intake. Appetite 52, 595602.
135. Tetley, A, Brunstrom, J & Griffiths, P (2009) Individual differences in food-cue reactivity. The role of BMI and everyday portion-size selections. Appetite 52, 614620.
136. Ferriday, D & Brunstrom, JM (2008) How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes? Br J Nutr 100, 13251332.
137. Huizinga, MM, Carlisle, AJ, Cavanaugh, KL et al. (2009) Literacy, numeracy, and portion-size estimation skills. Am J Prev Med 36, 324328.
138. Rothman, RL, Housam, R, Weiss, H et al. (2006) Patient understanding of food labels – the role of literacy and numeracy. Am J Prev Med 31, 391398.
139. Rolls, BJ, Roe, LS, Halverson, KH et al. (2007) Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 49, 652660.
140. Shah, M, Schroeder, R, Winn, W et al. (2011) A pilot study to investigate the effect of plate size on meal energy intake in normal weight and overweight/obese women. J Hum Nutr Diet 24, 612615.
141. Brunstrom, JM, Shakeshaft, NG & Alexander, E (2010) Familiarity changes expectations about fullness. Appetite 54, 587590.
142. Wansink, B, Painter, J & North, J (2005) Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res 13, 93100.
143. Fay, SH, Ferriday, D, Hinton, EC et al. (2011) What determines real-world meal size? Evidence for pre-meal planning. Appetite 56, 284289.
144. Wansink, B & van Ittersum, K (2007) Portion size me: downsizing our consumption norms. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 11031106.
145. Brunstrom, JM & Shakeshaft, NSG (2009) Measuring affective (liking) and non-affective (expected satiety) determinants of portion size and food reward. Appetite 52, 108114.
146. Brunstrom, JM, Shakeshaft, NG & Scott-Samuel, NE (2008) Measuring ‘expected satiety’ in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite 51, 604614.
147. Brunstrom, JM & Rogers, PJ (2009) How many calories are on our plate? Expected fullness, not liking, determines meal-size selection. Obesity 17, 18841890.
148. Brunstrom, JM, Collingwood, J & Rogers, PJ (2010) Perceived volume, expected satiation, and the energy content of self-selected meals. Appetite 55, 2529.
149. Brunstrom, JM (2011) The control of meal size in human subjects: a role for expected satiety, expected satiation and premeal planning. Proc Nutr Soc 70, 155161.
150. Scheibehenne, B, Todd, PM & Wansink, B (2010) Dining in the dark. The importance of visual cues for food consumption and satiety. Appetite 55, 710713.
151. Shimizu, M, Payne, CR & Wansink, B (2010) When snacks become meals: how hunger and environmental cues bias food intake. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7, 63.
152. Brunstrom, JM, Rogers, PJ, Pothos, EM et al. (2008) Estimating everyday portion size using a ‘method of constant stimuli’: In a student sample, portion size is predicted by gender, dietary behaviour, and hunger, but not BMI. Appetite 51, 296301.
153. Wansink, B & Chandon, P (2006) Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? J Market Res 43, 605617.

Keywords

Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?*

  • G. P. Faulkner (a1), L. K. Pourshahidi (a1), J. M. W. Wallace (a1), M. A. Kerr (a1), T. A. McCrorie (a1) and M. B. E. Livingstone (a1)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed