Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:24:26.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal comparison of energy and nutrient intakes from food diaries completed for a longitudinal study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2009

Kim Giles
Affiliation:
Osteoporosis Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Alexandra Mavroeidi
Affiliation:
School of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Fiona O'Neill
Affiliation:
Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, King's CollegeLondon 1st Floor South Wing, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK
Antonia Hardcastle
Affiliation:
Osteoporosis Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
David Reid
Affiliation:
Osteoporosis Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Helen Macdonald
Affiliation:
Osteoporosis Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

The current gold standard for estimating dietary intakes is the 7 d weighed-food record(Reference Willett1). There is increasing use of food diaries that use estimated portion sizes, which avoids subjects having to weigh every food they consume. However, food-diary completion is still burdensome to the individual, and time-consuming and expensive to analyse. Consequently, there is a paucity of information on the reproducibility and/or seasonal variation in nutrient intake calculated from estimated food diaries. The aim of the present study was to examine the variation in nutrient intake, reported by post-menopausal women, at 3-monthly intervals over a single year.

As part of a longitudinal study examining the role of diet and sunlight on vitamin D status, 357 post-menopausal women (age range 58–65 years) attended visits and were requested to complete food records, based on the EPIC(Reference Bingham, Gill and Welch2) food diary, in summer and autumn 2006, winter 2006–7 and spring 2007. The food diaries were analysed for nutrient content using WinDiets (Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen).

For the first three visits the majority of women completed diaries for 7 d; however, by the last visit (in spring 2007) more than half the subjects only completed 4 d diaries (including one weekend day). The average daily energy and nutrient intakes according to season are shown in the Table. Throughout the study, the ratio of mean energy intake (EI) to basal metabolic rate (BMR) remained above 1.40.

* Significance by repeated measures of log transformed variables (where required) [n 285].

There appeared to be a statistically significant seasonal variation in dietary intakes of some nutrients. Vitamin C and folate intakes were highest in summer 2006 and spring 2007 and lowest in winter 2006–7, possibly reflecting higher intakes of salads and fruit in the summer and spring. At present, there is no explanation for the vitamin D nadir in autumn or why Ca intakes should be highest in spring.

Further evaluation of seasonal variations in nutrient intakes is required. Nevertheless, any differences in nutrient intakes between the seasons appear to be small and may be negligible for the purposes of examining diet and health outcomes.

This work was funded by the Food Standards Agency. Any views expressed are the authors' own.

References

1. Willett, WC (1990) Nutritional Epidemiology, pp. 127132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2. Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A et al. (1997) Int J Epidemiol 26, Suppl. 1, S137S151.Google Scholar
Figure 0

*