Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Quality parenteral nutrition: an ideal mixed bag

  • Rebecca White (a1)

Abstract

Professor Pennington was an advocate for quality in all aspects of nutrition support and its delivery, ensuring that the patient remained at the centre of all decisions, and that specialist artificial nutrition support was best managed by the multidisciplinary nutrition team and the education of the wider healthcare community. Within the conference theme of ‘Quality’, this commentary aims to outline drivers for and risks to aspects of quality in parenteral nutrition (PN) services. Quality is defined as a particular property or attribute associated with excellence; in the context of the provision of PN this can be translated to quality processes and standards in the assessment, prescription, preparation, administration and monitoring of PN. Quality products and services are delivered through the timely application of knowledge, competence, procedures and standards. Quality can be so easily compromised; inattention, ignorance and arrogance all play their part. PN is a high-risk therapy; the quality of its delivery should not be entirely dependent on the skills, knowledge and competence of those delivering this care but on accepted standards, procedures, communication, resource and infrastructure. Identification of key steps in the provision of PN and a review of the relevant patient safety data reveal points where safeguards can be put in place to ensure quality is not compromised. Full evaluation of standardisation, computerisation and competency-based training as risk-reduction strategies is required.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Quality parenteral nutrition: an ideal mixed bag
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Quality parenteral nutrition: an ideal mixed bag
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Quality parenteral nutrition: an ideal mixed bag
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author: Rebecca White, fax +44 1865 235456, email rjwhite14@aol.com

References

Hide All
1.NCEPOD (2010) A Mixed Bag – An enquiry into the care of hospital patients receiving parenteral nutrition. NCEPOD. June 2010.
2.National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care (2006) Nutrition support in adults Oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition. National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care, London; available at http://www.rcseng.ac.uk
3.Department of Health (2010) Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. Department of Health, July 2010.
4.Kohn, LT, Corrigan, JM & Donaldson, MS (eds.) ( 2000) To Err is Human: Building a Safer Healthcare System. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press.
5.Department of Health (2000) An organisation with a memory. London: Department of Health.
6.Burgmeier, J (2002) Failure mode and effect analysis: An application in reducing risk in blood transfusion. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 28, 331339.
7.Apkon, M, Leonard, J, Probst, L et al. (2004) Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: Failure mode effects analysis. Qual Saf Health Care 13, 265271.
8.Reason, J (2000) Human error: Models and management. Br Med J 320, 768770.
9.FDA (1994) FDA Safety Alert: Hazards of Precipitation Associated With Parenteral Nutrition. April 1994.
10.Ball, PA (2001) Methods of assessing stability of parenteral nutrition regimens. Curr Opin Nutr Metab Care 4, 345349.
11.Rubin, M, Bilik, R, Aserin, A et al. (1989) Catheter obstruction: Analysis of filter content of total nutrient admixture. JPEN 13, 641643.
12.NPSA (2007) NPSA Patient Safety Alert 19. Promoting safer measurement and administration of liquid medicines via oral and other enteral routes. March 2007.
13.Sarvadikar, A, Prescott, G & Williams, D (2010) Attitudes to reporting medication error among differing healthcare professionals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 66, 843853.
14.NPSA (2010) Personal Communication. NPSA. August 2010.
15.NPSA (2009) Safety in Doses: Improving the use of medicines in the NHS. NPSA. September 2009.
16.ASPEN (2010) Reporting Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Therapy and Device related errors; available at http://www.nutritioncare.org
17.Allwood, MC & Kearney, MCJ (1998) Compatibility and stability of additives in parenteral nutrition admixtures. Nutrition 14, 467706.
18.MHRA (2010) New contraindications for calcium gluconate injection in small-volume glass containers. MHRA Drug Safety Update 4(1), 34.
19.Bethune, K, Allwood, MC, Grainger, C et al. . (2001) Use of filters during the preparation and administration of parenteral nutrition: Position paper and guidelines prepared by a British Pharmaceutical Nutrition Group working party. Nutrition 17, 403408.
20.Puntis, J (2010) Safe parenteral nutrition and the role of standardised feeds. Signa Vitae 5, 8–12.
21.Maswoswe, JJ, Newcomer, DR & Quandt, CM (1987) Achieving parenteral nutrition cost savings through prescribing guidelines and formulary restrictions. Am J Hosp Pharm 44, 13761381.
22.Pichard, C, Schwarz, G, Frei, A et al. (2000) Economic investigation of the use of three-compartment total parenteral nutrition bag: Prospective randomized unblinded controlled study. Clin Nutr 19, 245251.
23.Petros, WP & Shank, WA (1986) A standardised parenteral nutrition solution: Prescribing, use, processing and material cost implications. Hosp Pharm 21, 648649, 654656.
24.Smolkin, T, Diab, G, Shohat, I et al. (2010) Standardized versus individualized parenteral nutrition in very low birth weight infants: A comparative study. Neonatology 98, 170178.
25.BPNG (2008) Position Statement on the use of multi-chamber parenteral nutrition bags for use in adult patients; available at http://www.bpng.co.uk
26.McDowell, SE, Ferner, HS & Ferner, RE (2009) The pathophysiology of medication errors: How and where they arise. Br J Clin Pharmacol 76, 605613.
27.O'Hare, MCB, Bradley, AM, Gallagher, T et al. (1995) Errors in administration of intravenous drugs. Br Med J 310, 1536.
28.Taxis, K & Barber, N (2003) Causes of intravenous medication errors: An ethnographic study. Qual Saf Health Care 12, 343348.
29.McDowell, SE, Mt-Isa, S, Ashby, D et al. (2010) Where errors occur in the preparation and administration of intravenous medicines: A systematic review and Bayesian analysis. Qual Saf Health Care 19, 341345.
30.NPSA (2002) NPSA Patient Safety Alert Potassium Chloride Concentrate Solution. October 2002.
31.NPSA (2007) NPSA Patient Safety Alert 20. Promoting Safer use of injectable medicines. March 2007.
32.Bateman, R & Donyai, P (2010). Errors associated with the preparation of aseptic products in UK hospital pharmacies: Lessons from the national aseptic error reporting scheme. Qual Saf Health Care 19(5), e29.
33.Lehmann, CU, Conner, KG & Cox, JM (2004) Preventing provider errors: Online total parenteral nutrition calculator. Pediatrics 113, 748753.
34.Poon, EG, Keohane, CA, Yoon, CS et al. (2010) Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. NEJM 362, 16981707.
35.BPNG (2008) BPNG Competency Framework for Specialist Nutrition Pharmacists, 1st edn., available at http://www.bpng.co.uk
36.NNNG (2010) A Competency Framework for Nutrition Nurse Specialists, 1st edn., available at www.nnng.org
37.Department of Health (2008) A strategic framework for intestinal failure and home parenteral nutrition services for adults in England. April 2008. National Commissioning Group for Highly Specialist Services. Department of Health.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed