Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:57:52.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary investigation into the effects of SlimBiome on food cravings and responsiveness to the food environment in healthy overweight and obese women following standard nutritional advice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

I. Achebe
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK
H. Brennan
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK
S. Kolida
Affiliation:
OptiBiotix Health Plc, Heslington, York, YO10 5DG, UK.
S. OHara
Affiliation:
OptiBiotix Health Plc, Heslington, York, YO10 5DG, UK.
H. Lightowler
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK
L. Ahlstrom
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

The prevalence of obesity is rising, with current UK statistics indicating that 68 % of men and 58 % of women are classified as overweight or obese(1). Consequently, effective weight management is of increasing importance and considerable attention is being placed on the use of functional ingredients in foods that are less energy dense and more satiating. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of SlimBiome, a commercially available product, on food cravings and the responsiveness of individuals to the food environment, which are characteristics associated with hunger(Reference Steel, Kemps and Tiggemann2, Reference Forman, Hoffman and McGrath3), in overweight and obese women following standard nutritional advice. SlimBiome contains fibre (glucomannan), prebiotics and chromium, which have been shown to increase satiety and reduce energy intake, hunger and fat cravings in overweight and obese adults(Reference Parnell and Reimer4Reference Anton, Morrison and Cefalu6).

A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 20 overweight and obese women over a 4-week period. Inclusion criteria included women aged 18–65 years, with a body mass index between 25–35 kg/m2, no significant health problems, and no history of dieting within the month prior to starting the study. Participants attended three study visits at week 0, week 1 and week 4. At week 0 they were randomly assigned to receive the test drink or placebo and were instructed to consume the drink three times a day for 4 weeks. At each visit, participants rated subjective sensations of appetite before and after consuming the test drink or placebo and completed the Control of Eating Questionnaire (CofEQ)(Reference Dalton, Finlayson, Hill and Blundell7) and the Power of Food Scale (POF)(Reference Cappelleri, Bushmakin and Gerber8). During the week 0 visit, standard nutritional advice based on the Eat Well Guide was provided to all participants. Differences in week 0 and week 4 POF Scale scores for both groups were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Differences between group week 4 CofEQ scores were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), including baseline scores from week 0 as covariates.

For the CofEQ, ratings in response to ‘How hungry have you felt?’ at week 4 were significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the placebo group (P = 0·034). No significant differences were observed between the groups at week 4 for CofEQ items assessing frequency or strength of food cravings (P > 0·05 for all items). For the POF Scale, scores decreased significantly after the 4-week intervention period in both the placebo group (P = 0·035) and the treatment group (P = 0·007).

In conclusion, subjective feelings of hunger measured by the CofEQ were significantly reduced in women who consumed SlimBiome compared to placebo. Although cravings appeared to subside more in women consuming SlimBiome, no significant difference was seen compared to placebo. This may be due to both groups becoming less responsive to the food environment, a characteristic shown to predict strength of and ability to resist cravings(Reference Forman, Hoffman and McGrath3).

References

2.Steel, D, Kemps, E & Tiggemann, M (2006 Jan 1) Appetite 46(1), 3640.Google Scholar
3.Forman, EM, Hoffman, KL, McGrath, KB et al. (2007 Oct 1) Behav Res Ther 45(10), 2372–86.Google Scholar
4.Parnell, JA & Reimer, RA (2009 Apr 22) Am J Clin Nutr 89(6), 1751–9.Google Scholar
5.Archer, BJ, Johnson, SK, Devereux, HM & Baxter, AL (2004 Apr) Br J Nutr 91(4), 591–9.Google Scholar
6.Anton, SD, Morrison, CD, Cefalu, WT et al. (2008 Oct 1) Diabetes Technol Ther 10(5), 405–12.Google Scholar
7.Dalton, M, Finlayson, G, Hill, A & Blundell, J (2015 Dec) Eur J Clin Nutr 69(12), 1313.Google Scholar
8.Cappelleri, JC, Bushmakin, AG, Gerber, RA et al. (2009 Aug) Int J Obes 33(8), 913.Google Scholar