Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Access
  • Cited by 57


      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Gut microbiota, the pharmabiotics they produce and host health
        Available formats

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Gut microbiota, the pharmabiotics they produce and host health
        Available formats

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Gut microbiota, the pharmabiotics they produce and host health
        Available formats
Export citation


A healthy gut microbiota plays many crucial functions in the host, being involved in the correct development and functioning of the immune system, assisting in the digestion of certain foods and in the production of health-beneficial bioactive metabolites or ‘pharmabiotics’. These include bioactive lipids (including SCFA and conjugated linoleic acid) antimicrobials and exopolysaccharides in addition to nutrients, including vitamins B and K. Alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota and reductions in microbial diversity are highlighted in many disease states, possibly rendering the host susceptible to infection and consequently negatively affecting innate immune function. Evidence is also emerging of microbially produced molecules with neuroactive functions that can have influences across the brain–gut axis. For example, γ-aminobutyric acid, serotonin, catecholamines and acetylcholine may modulate neural signalling within the enteric nervous system, when released in the intestinal lumen and consequently signal brain function and behaviour. Dietary supplementation with probiotics and prebiotics are the most widely used dietary adjuncts to modulate the gut microbiota. Furthermore, evidence is emerging of the interactions between administered microbes and dietary substrates, leading to the production of pharmabiotics, which may directly or indirectly positively influence human health.

The microbial ecosystem residing in the human gut consists of over 100-fold more genes than the human genome( 1 3 ) and is tantamount to a virtual organ. To a large extent, intestinal ecological conditions are set by the host and resident commensals must adapt to this environment. Host–microbe, environment–microbe and microbe–microbe interactions may also dictate the composition of this microbial community. A symbiotic relationship exists between the gut microbiota and host such that both partners benefit; the host provides protection and nutrients for the micro-organisms to flourish within( 4 ), whereas the microbiota contribute to food digestion, inhibit the growth of potential invading pathogens, convert harmful compounds into less toxic substances and produce bioactive molecules, which play a role in host physiology( 5 ). Disruptions to this symbiotic relationship can occur, for example, during certain disease states and during adoptive pathogenesis by certain commensal gut microbes causing small intestinal bacterial overgrowth( 6 , 7 ) and/or translocation to other tissues and organs( 8 , 9 ). However, it remains unclear whether disease development is causal or consequential of an altered intestinal microbiota, with an increasing body of evidence describing a link between the two.

Microbial colonisation of the infant intestine begins at birth( 10 ). Extrinsic factors contribute to the initial colonisation of the infant gut( 11 , 12 ), including mode of delivery( 13 ), feeding regime( 14 , 15 ), gestational age at birth( 16 ) and antibiotic therapy( 17 , 18 ). Intestinal establishment of a healthy microbiota is believed to have a profound impact on the development and maturation of the immune system( 19 ). Vaginally born infants are initially colonised by faecal and vaginal bacteria from the mother, whereas infants delivered by Caesarean-section render the gut susceptible to colonisation by maternal skin microbiota and bacteria from the hospital environment( 13 , 20 , 21 ). It has been shown that vaginally born babies have higher numbers of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, compared with infants delivered by Caesarean-section( 13 ). The weaning process determines the transition of an unstable infant microbiota to a more complex adult-like microbial ecosystem( 10 , 22 ). The development and diversification of the gut microbiota continues into adulthood and is further influenced by several factors, including diet and environment( 23 ). To a large extent, the gut microbiota remains relatively stable throughout adulthood, unless perturbed by extrinsic or host factors, including antibiotic treatment and inflammation, respectively.

The tools used for studying the link between gut microbial diversity and health status have improved our knowledge of the host–microbe relationship significantly. Culture-independent analysis of the composition and functional capacity of the gut microbiome targets the 16S rRNA gene, due to its presence in all prokaryotes with the existence of variable domains that allow different taxa to be identified. Although compositional studies generate a large volume of data, they fail to provide direct information regarding the microbial viability or the functional potential of the populations present and so the knowledge generated is somewhat limited in these aspects. Metagenomic studies go beyond the 16S rRNA gene to sequence small fragments of metagenomic DNA at random to characterise the full genetic content and functional potential of the microbial community( 2 , 24 , 25 ). The development of methods used to analyse gene expression (metatranscriptomics), protein products (metaproteomics) and metabolic profiles (metabolomics) of the gut microbiota has further enabled such studies to identify the microbial activity and to link this with compositional analysis, to determine host–microbe interactions( 26 ).

Dietary interventions with probiotics and prebiotics, due to the dynamic nature of the gut microbial ecosystem, have become an attractive means of self-manipulating the microbiota to improve health status, and have been extensively reviewed( 27 , 28 ). Probiotics are defined as ‘live micro-organisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host’( 29 ) and have been shown to improve intestinal barrier function, modulate the immune system and enhance the host defence system by competing against pathogens for nutrients and binding sites. In addition, numerous probiotic intervention studies have revealed their functional capacity to improve certain gastrointestinal disorders, for example, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)( 30 , 31 ) and antibiotic-associated diarrhoea( 32 , 33 ). Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the main genera of micro-organisms used as probiotics as many of them can survive gastrointestinal transit, have the capability to adhere to intestinal epithelial cells and are regarded as safe( 34 ). Prebiotics are non-digestible food ingredients that selectively stimulate the growth of beneficial indigenous microbes already established within the gut such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli( 35 ). Typically, prebiotics must reach the large intestine unaltered, resisting host digestion, absorption and adsorption to be fermented by the gut microbiota. Commonly used prebiotics include inulin, fructo-oligosaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides( 36 ). The fermentation of prebiotics by the gut microbiota generates SCFA, such as butyric and acetic acids, which are linked with numerous health benefits in vivo ( 35 , 36 ). This review will focus on the importance of the microbiota to host health and in establishing a healthy immune system and describes some of the known beneficial bioactive metabolites produced by the microbiota that impact on health.

Role of the microbiota in establishing a healthy immune system

During the first year of life, the immature developing gut microbial ecosystem rapidly shapes the maturation of the infant immune system, while the immune system also influences the gut microbiota( 37 ). From birth, breast milk provides passive transfer of maternal antibodies to the infant which shapes both the immature immune system and gut microbiota( 4 ). Much of the information regarding the influence of gut microbes on the host immune system is generated from studies using germ-free animals, i.e. those born and reared without exposure to micro-organisms such that the immune responses have not been influenced by interactions with molecules of commensal and pathogenic micro-organisms. Consequently, germ-free animals show defects in both the development of the immune system and in immune responses. One of the first immunological defects observed in these animals was a marked reduction in antibodies produced within the intestine( 38 ). Furthermore, germ-free animals show extensive defects in the development of gut-associated lymphoid tissue and have fewer and smaller Peyer's patches and mesenteric lymph nodes, compared with animals housed under specific pathogen-free conditions( 39 42 ). Intestinal epithelial cells have many immunological functions; they secrete and respond to various cytokines and express molecules that directly interact with lymphocytes and line the gut to form a physical barrier between the luminal contents (including the microbiota) and the underlying cells of the immune system( 43 ). Germ-free mice demonstrate a reduced number of these cells, whereby their function is compromised( 44 , 45 ) and demonstrate decreased cell turnover rates of these cells( 46 ). Furthermore, animals lacking a gut microbiota are more susceptible to infection due to a poorly developed immune system; e.g. germ-free guinea-pigs challenged with the enteric pathogen Shigella flexneri demonstrated a decrease in the immune resistance to infection coupled with an increase in mortality( 47 ), while infection with the intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes in germ-free mice resulted in decreased pathogen clearance, compared with conventionalised animals( 48 ). Deliberate colonisation of the sterile gut of these animals either with a single microbial species or a defined species mixture, termed ‘gnotobiotics’ is a powerful technological tool for determining which host immune functions are genetically encoded and which require interactions with microbes( 49 ). For example, colonisation of germ-free animals with a single bacterium, Bacteroides fragilis, has been shown to protect against inflammation in an animal model of experimental colitis( 50 , 51 ). Collectively, these observations suggest that developmental defects through the absence of a gut microbial ecosystem compromise immune function of the host at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels and highlight a role of the microbiota in the establishment of a functional immune system.

Implications of a perturbed gut microbiota on immune function and health

Antibiotic therapy soon after birth has been shown to impact gut microbiota composition up to 8 weeks after treatment( 17 , 18 ). This could have a negative impact on the development of the immune system, predisposing the infant to development of asthma, obesity and allergies( 17 , 18 ). Thus, disruptions in the host–microbe relationship can undoubtedly predispose to disease, from infancy to adulthood. There has been a rapid increase in the development of disorders such as IBD, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes and obesity, particularly within developed, Western populations. Indeed, the role of a perturbed gut microbial ecosystem in such diseases is becoming more evident, although future work is needed to decipher the mechanisms involved.

Inflammatory bowel disease

IBD comprises a group of disorders characterised by severe intestinal inflammation and is characterised as either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, based on the location of the gastrointestinal tract affected. Although the exact causes of IBD remain unclear, the onset of both conditions is generally thought to be due to an overall disruption in the host–microbe relationship, and not by a single causal organism( 52 , 53 ). Recently reviewed, numerous studies which indicate a role of the gut microbiota in the manifestation of IBD generally conclude that the gut microbiota are involved in the development of mucosal lesions causing intestinal inflammation( 54 ). Inflammatory damage in IBD has been linked to alterations in the relative abundances of Enterobacteriaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Leuconostocaceae ( 55 ) and an overall decrease in bacterial diversity( 56 , 57 ). The incidence of Clostridium difficile carriage, an opportunistic pathogen frequently linked with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, has been reported to be over 8-fold higher in patients suffering from IBD, compared with healthy controls( 58 ).

Type-1 and type-2 diabetes

The incidence of both type-1- (T1D) and type-2- (T2D) diabetes have increased dramatically in recent decades. Although genetic factors play a role in disease onset, particularly in predisposing individuals to T1D, T2D is principally linked to obesity associated insulin resistance. Recent studies demonstrate disruptions to the host–microbe relationship and gut microbial composition and diversity associated with both T1D and T2D. Compositional sequencing studies have revealed a reduction in the relative proportions of Firmicutes, while Bacteroidetes were enriched in T2D subjects, compared with healthy controls( 59 ). Identification of gut microbial markers associated with the moderate degree of microbial disruption in patients with T2D could be useful in the future management of this disease( 60 ). Furthermore, increases in opportunistic pathogens such as Clostridium were identified as contributing to disruption of host–microbe interactions associated with T2D( 60 ). Creating a link between the gut microbiota and T1D is more difficult, since genetic factors play a more significant role in this disease. However, evidence indicates that alterations in the intestinal microbiota are associated with T1D and subsequent insulin dependence in various models of the disease. While one study demonstrated that the stool of bio-breeding diabetes-resistant rats contained higher relative abundances of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, compared with bio-breeding diabetes-prone rats( 61 ), others have reported that lactate-producing species such as Lactobacillus, Lactococcus and Bifidobacterium were increased in the stool of children who tested positive for T1D-associated autoimmunity( 62 , 63 ). Furthermore, low relative abundances of two of the most common Bifidobacterium species, B. adolescentis and B. pseudocatenulatum have been associated with autoimmunity in children who tested positive for at least two T1D-associated autoantibodies( 64 ).


Excessive energy intake over expenditure is the main cause of obesity, since host-negative feedback signals are insufficient to maintain normal weight in circumstances of plentiful food/energy supply. Although lifestyle, genetic factors, diet and exercise undoubtedly contribute largely to this modern epidemic, an increasing body of evidence suggests that disruptions to the host–microbe relationship also contribute( 65 68 ). Identifying specific populations which may be associated with weight gain has been the subject of much debate, often differing among various models of obesity in both rodent and human subjects. Genetically (ob/ob) and diet-induced obese mice have been shown to harbour an increased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio, compared with their lean counterparts( 66 ). Furthermore, weight loss in human subjects has been linked with decreased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio( 1 ), but yet the relevance of the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio in obesity remains unclear( 69 ). The gut microbiota also increase the dietary energy-harvesting capacity of the host( 70 ) and conventionally raised mice have been shown to contain 40 % more body fat than their germ-free counterparts, while colonisation with a conventional gut microbiota induced hepatic lipogenesis and increased lipid storage in adipocytes( 3 ).

Obesity is also associated with low-grade inflammation, which may be linked to host–microbe interactions. Data from several studies have revealed that the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin derived from certain components of the gut microbiota contributes towards obesity-associated inflammation. Endogenous LPS is continuously produced in the gut as a consequence of inactivation of Gram-negative bacteria, since LPS is a component of the Gram-negative bacterial cell wall and acts through the Toll-like receptor 4/MyD88/NF-κB-signalling pathway. LPS-induced inflammation could also be an early factor which triggers high-fat diet-induced metabolic diseases, otherwise known as metabolic endotoxemia( 71 ). It has been shown that high-fat feeding increased plasma LPS levels throughout the day, compared with controls, resulting in significant increases in fasting blood glucose, insulin, liver TAG content, body weight and proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression, similar to mice that were infused with LPS( 71 ). Further studies examined the effect of changes in the gut microbiota leading to LPS-induced metabolic endotoxemia( 72 ). It was revealed that while plasma LPS levels were increased following high-fat feeding relative to controls, this result was overturned in high-fat diet-fed mice following antibiotic treatment( 72 ). Such studies reveal that disruptions to host–microbe interactions within the gut following obesity and high-fat diet may generate increased gastrointestinal levels of microbial-derived LPS endotoxin, associated with metabolic endotoxemia.

Microbial metabolism of choline and CVD

Choline is a water-soluble essential nutrient, an important component of cell membranes and mediates lipid metabolism and VLDL synthesis in the liver( 73 ). In addition, choline is a precursor to the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, which has important functions in cognition, as discussed later. While small quantities of choline are continuously synthesised by the host, it is mostly obtained from foods such as red meats and eggs. From infancy, breast milk is an important source of choline and the US Food and Drug Administration requires that infant formula not made from cow's milk be supplemented with choline. Much like a choline-deficient diet, microbial metabolism of choline decreases the bioavailable levels of this essential nutrient and triggers non-alcoholic fatty liver disease( 74 ). The gut microbiota play a role in the transformation of dietary choline to trimethylamine with subsequent metabolism in the liver to the toxic methylamine, trimethylamine-N-oxide( 74 , 75 ). Excess plasma levels of the pro-atherosclerotic metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide and its metabolites are associated with CVD( 76 ). One recent study highlighted a direct link between increased plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide levels, increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and the gut microbiota( 77 ). Plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide levels were suppressed following antibiotic treatment, but reappeared following antibiotic withdrawal( 77 ).

Host–microbe interactions, generation of long-chain PUFA and microbial metabolite production with health effects

The products of human enteric microbial metabolism often act as signalling molecules, developing ‘intelligent communication systems’ in the body. These pharmabiotics can exert beneficial health effects, which directly impact host intestinal function but may also affect the liver and brain( 78 ). Host–microbe interactions can together co-metabolise dietary components to produce a large array of molecules with beneficial impacts on health. Commensal bacteria have been shown to synthesise essential vitamins such as vitamin K2 and B vitamins( 79 ), can alter n-3 PUFA metabolism to generate increased levels of long-chain PUFA metabolites such as EPA and DHA( 80 , 81 ), can produce conjugated fatty acid derivatives of PUFA such as conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and conjugated α-linolenic acid( 82 , 83 ) and can increase production of SCFA( 81 ). The beneficial impacts of some of these bioactive compounds on host health are reviewed later and summarised in Table 1.

Table 1. Effects of probiotic metabolite production on host metabolic and psychiatric health

CLA, conjugated linoleic acid; EPS, exopolysaccharides; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid.

Vitamin synthesis

Some commensals of the human gut microbiota possess the ability to synthesise menaquinone (vitamin K2), as well as many of the water-soluble B vitamins such as biotin, cobalamin, folate, nicotinic acid, panthotenic acid, pyridoxine, riboflavin and thiamine( 92 ). In particular, many Bifidobacterium strains have been shown to exhibit vitamin production capabilities( 93 95 ). Vitamin K is a lipophilic vitamin which acts as a co-factor for the enzyme γ-carboxylase, which converts specific glutamyl residues in a limited number of proteins to γ-carboxyglutamyl (Gla) residues, responsible for high-affinity binding of calcium ions( 92 ). The daily requirement for vitamin K is fulfilled by dietary phylloquinone, present in plants and to an undetermined extent, by bacterially produced vitamin K2 ( 92 ). Vitamin K is important for blood clotting, bone and vascular health and deficiencies have been associated with low bone mineral density( 96 , 97 ), increased risk of fracture( 98 , 99 ) and CVD( 100 ).

Vitamin B12 is a type of cobalt corrinoid, particularly of the cobalamin group and is solely synthesised by some bacteria and archea. Vitamin B12 biosynthesis was first identified in Propionibacteria freudenreichii, now used in the commercial production of the vitamin( 101 ). Furthermore, Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1098 was shown to be the first lactic acid producing bacterial strain capable of producing a cobalamin-like compound with an absorption spectrum resembling that of standard cobalamin( 102 ). The genetic pathway responsible for the de novo synthesis of vitamin B12 by L. reuteri has previously been described for two L. reuteri strains( 103 ). More recently, the presence of bifidobacterial genes, predicted to be involved in the biosynthesis of several B vitamins has been identified in bifidobacteria residing in faecal samples of adult subjects( 104 106 ).

PUFA and conjugated fatty acid synthesis

PUFA contain two or more double bonds and are classified as either n-3, n-6 or n-9, based on the location of the last double bond relative to the terminal methyl end of the molecule. Linoleic acid (18:2n-6; precursor to the n-6 series of fatty acids) and α-linolenic acid (18:3n-3; precursor to the n-3 series of fatty acids) are the simplest members of each family of PUFA and are essential fatty acids. PUFA regulate a wide variety of biological functions, ranging from blood pressure and blood clotting, to the development and functioning of the brain and nervous system. It has been shown that the gut microbiota not only affects fat quantity( 3 ), but also affects fat quality( 80 , 86 ) in various animal models. CLA refers to a family of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid, which have been associated with several health benefits. The CLA isomers cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 are most often studied for their beneficial in vitro and in some cases in vivo health effects associated with various types of cancer, atherosclerosis, obesity, diabetes, as well as an ability to improve immune function, body composition and bone formation( 107 119 ). It has recently been shown that plasma CLA metabolite concentrations in human subjects following dietary CLA supplementation were comparable with those previously observed in experimental animal models and sufficient enough to exert health benefits( 120 ). Considerable species variations among bifidobacteria have been observed for PUFA and CLA productions. Although Bifidobacterium breve has been reported as one of the most efficient CLA producers among various strains tested( 121 , 122 ), Bifidobacterium bifidum ( 122 ) and Bifidobacterium dentium ( 121 ) have also demonstrated good conversion rates in vitro. It has been shown that administered CLA-producing strains of bifidobacteria are metabolically active in the gastrointestinal tract of mice and pigs( 80 ). Furthermore, administration of B. breve NCIMB 702258 in combination with linoleic acid resulted in modulation of tissue fatty acid composition, significantly increasing levels of cis-9, trans-11 CLA in the liver of both mice and pigs( 80 ). Increased tissue concentrations of n-3 long-chain PUFA, EPA and DHA were also found in the adipose tissue of both mice and pigs( 80 ). Furthermore, the ratio of arachidonic acid to EPA in the liver and adipose tissue was reduced following B. breve supplementation, coupled with an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in the host( 80 ). Both EPA and DHA have previously been shown to exert anti-inflammatory properties( 123 ). In a related study, it was found that administration of B. breve NCIMB 702258 in combination with α-linolenic acid was associated with alterations in the fatty acid composition of the brain, with elevated levels of EPA and DHA( 81 ). Such studies have demonstrated that manipulation of the gut microbiota with metabolically active strains may represent a therapeutic strategy for various disorders related to inflammation in the host, through the production of long-chain PUFA and PUFA-derived conjugated fatty acids.

Production of SCFA

SCFA are the end products of anaerobic gut microbial fermentation of undigested dietary fibres and have important functions in host energy metabolism. Indeed, SCFA play a key role in the prevention and treatment of metabolic and bowel disorders and certain types of cancer( 124 128 ). The positive influence of SCFA treatment on ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease have been demonstrated in various clinical studies( 129 133 ). Butyrate is the primary energy source for cellular metabolism in the colonic epithelium( 134 ). The colonic epithelial cells of germ-free mice are severely energy-deprived and are characterised by increased activation of AMP-activated protein kinase, which senses cellular energy status( 135 ). SCFA also regulate gene expression in the host by binding to the G-protein-coupled receptors, GPR41 and GPR43 to impact on several different cellular functions in the host, depending on the cell type( 136 ). For example, SCFA suppress inflammation through GPR43 signalling in immune cells( 137 , 138 ) and modulate secretion of the insulin secreting and antidiabetic hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 in the distal small intestine and colon( 139 ).

Microbial production of exopolysaccharides

Many organisms including some resident microbes of the gut microbial ecosystem have the ability to synthesise exopolysaccharides (EPS) with a large variation in composition, charge and molecular structure( 140 ). EPS-producing strains are responsible for a ‘ropy’ phenotype and are beneficial in the food and health industries. Health benefits associated with EPS include immunostimulatory effects( 88 , 141 ), blood cholesterol-lowering effects( 87 , 142 ) and prebiotic effects( 143 , 144 ). β-Glucan is a water-soluble fibre found in cereals, as well as in yeast, bacteria, algae and mushrooms( 145 ). The EPS β-glucan has been reported to have many health promoting properties, including immunomodulatory effects( 146 149 ), lowering serum cholesterol levels( 145 , 150 ), antiosteoporotic( 151 ), antitumourigenic, anticytotoxic and antimutagenic effects( 152 , 153 ). Furthermore, oat β-glucan has also been associated with the ability to modulate satiety, thus controlling appetite( 154 , 155 ). Heterologous expression of the pediococcal glycotransferase (gtf) gene responsible for the synthesis and secretion of the two substituted (1,3) β-d-glucan in Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 increased the stress tolerance of the probiotic, due to EPS production( 140 ). Furthermore, B. breve UCC2003 has been shown to produce two EPS which have been associated with an increased resilience of this strain to tolerate acid and bile while reducing the intestinal colonisation levels of pathogenic Citrobacter rodentium ( 156 ). Thus, EPS production is thought to be important not only in host interactions, but also for protection against pathogenic infection.

The gut–brain axis: microbial metabolite production with implications on host psychiatric health

The gut–brain axis is a bidirectional communication system between the brain and the gut, including the metabolically complex gut microbiota which integrates neural, hormonal and immunological signalling between the gut and the brain( 157 ). The gut microbiota and the metabolites they produce may also modulate the peripheral nervous system and central nervous system (CNS) to influence brain development and function( 158 ). To date, numerous studies have demonstrated the importance of the gut microbiota in the stress response( 159 , 160 ) and neurodevelopmental disorders( 161 163 ). Commensal microbiota have demonstrated the ability to interact with the serotonergic system in the host by regulating the development of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis, a neuroendocrine system that controls reactions to stress( 160 ). Recent studies have demonstrated that germ-free mice display a reduction in anxiety-like behaviour( 164 , 165 ), compared with conventionally colonised mice, possibly through an enhanced hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal response. Another study using germ-free mice described how in the absence of gut microbiota, mice exhibited deficits in social motivation and preference for social novelty, behavioural characteristics indicative of disruptions in distinct normal social behaviours( 162 ). Probiotic intervention has proven successful for the treatment of psychiatric disorders such as anxiety( 90 , 166 ), depression( 91 ) and autism( 167 ). Bifidobacterium infantis 35 624, when administered to a maternal separation animal model of depression, exhibited antidepressant properties( 91 ), Lactobacillus rhamnosus JB-1 has also demonstrated antianxiety and antidepressant properties through activation of the vagus nerve in mice, compared with broth-fed controls( 90 ) and B. fragilis administration alleviated autistic-like behavioural impairments in communication, social behaviour, social abnormalities and restricted/repetitive behaviour in mice symptomatic of this disorder, compared with autistic, untreated controls( 167 ). Furthermore, administration of B. breve NCIMB 702258 to mice had a significant impact on the fatty acid composition of the brain( 81 ). Mice that received the bacteria for 8 weeks exhibited higher concentrations of bioactive fatty acids, arachidonic acid and DHA, compared with unsupplemented controls( 81 ), whereby these bioactive fatty acids have a role in neurotransmission and protection against oxidative stress( 168 , 169 ).

A broad range of microbes, either probiotics or commensals can manufacture and secrete neurochemicals which can positively impact on mental health and thus, could be used for the treatment of CNS disorders, such as anxiety and depression. Recently defined, a psychobiotic is ‘a live micro-organism that, when ingested in adequate amounts, produces a health benefit in patients suffering from psychiatric illness’( 170 ). Moreover, disruptions in the composition of the gut microbiota may lead to a deterioration of gastrointestinal, neuroendocrine and immune pathways, which could in turn lead to alterations in gut–brain interactions and consequently result in disease( 171 ). The gut microbiota produce a range of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, bioactive metabolites which impact on host psychiatric health, only some of which have been demonstrated in vivo (Table 1).

Gamma-aminobutyric acid

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter of the vertebrate CNS and is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. Dysfunctions of GABA have been linked with anxiety and depression( 172 , 173 ). Certain strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium secrete GABA via the same biosynthetic pathway as in neuronal tissue involving conversion of glutamate by the action of the enzyme glutamate decarboxylase and vitamin co-factor pyridoxal phosphate( 174 ). Furthermore, the GABA producing capability of some bacterial strains is thought to protect the organism from the acidic environment of the stomach( 175 ). Several human-derived lactobacilli and bifidobacteria were screened for their ability to produce GABA from monosodium glutamate, and it was found that five strains had this ability( 176 ). Of these strains, Lactobacillus brevis and B. dentium were the most efficient GABA producers( 176 ). Ko et al.( 89 ), recently demonstrated GABA production in black soyabean milk by L. brevis FPA3709 and its administration to rats resulted in an antidepressant effect similar to that of fluoxetine, a common antidepressant drug, but without the side-effects such as appetite and weight loss( 89 ). At the level of gene expression, ingestion of L. rhamnosus JB-1 altered the mRNA expression of both GABAA and GABAB, two GABA receptors which have been implicated in anxiety and depression( 90 ).


Serotonin is a metabolite of the amino acid tryptophan and plays an important role in the regulation of a number of brain functions, including mood( 170 ). The vast majority of antidepressant drugs work to increase serotonin levels in the brain and some studies have shown that bacteria can synthesise serotonin in vivo. For example, plasma serotonin levels were shown to be nearly 3-fold higher in conventional mice than in their germ-free counterparts( 177 ). Oral ingestion of B. infantis 35 624 increased the plasma levels of tryptophan, precursor to serotonin, suggesting that commensal bacteria have the ability to influence tryptophan metabolism and could potentially act as antidepressants( 91 ). This effect on tryptophan metabolism may be mediated by the impact of the microbiota on the expression of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, a key enzyme in the physiologically dominant kynurenine pathway of tryptophan metabolism( 158 ). Early life stress induces changes in the gut microbiota and is a known risk factor for depression in adulthood( 178 ). This phenomenon has been shown in rhesus monkeys, whereby prenatal stressors have been shown to alter the microbiome by reducing the overall numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli( 179 ).

Catecholamines and acetylcholine

Catecholamines such as dopamine and norepinephrine are the major neurotransmitters that mediate a variety of CNS functions such as motor control, cognition, memory processing, emotion and endocrine regulation. Tsavkelova et al.( 180 ), identified a wide range of bacteria, which produce mmol quantities of dopamine( 180 ) and which could be used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and other major depressive disorders whereby dysfunctions in catecholamine neurotransmission are implicated. In addition, bacteria which constitute the normal gut microbiome in mice have been shown to be capable of the production of norepinephrine in vivo ( 181 ). Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter found in the CNS and peripheral nervous system which plays a critical role in cognitive function, particularly in memory and learning. Previous studies have shown that acetylcholine is both a component of bacterial strains, including Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus subtilis ( 182 184 ) and a microbial metabolite.


Pharmabiotics produced by the gut microbiota can undoubtedly influence a variety of physiological and metabolic systems/processes in the human body. At a local level they can induce changes in the gut epithelium and the enteric nervous system, while at a more systemic level processes as wide-ranging as immune function and CNS signalling may be affected( 185 ). Consequently it is not surprising that alternations in the microbial consortium are being found to be associated with a number of disease states such as IBD, diabetes, obesity, anxiety and depression. Disturbances to the delicate host–microbe relationship may disrupt development of the immune system, which may in turn result in disease. The gut microbiota have the ability to produce a variety of metabolites that exert beneficial effects on biological and neurological functions. Probiotics, prebiotics and dietary PUFA offer the potential to modulate the gut microbiota with knock-on health effects. Microbe manipulation to strengthen the host–microbe symbiotic relationship may be crucial for the future prevention of immune and psychiatric-related disorders.

Financial Support

E. P. was supported by funding from the Teagasc Walsh Fellowship Scheme (2010–2013) and the work was supported by the Science Foundation of Ireland – funded Centre for Science, Engineering and Technology, the Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, CSET grant 07/CE/B1368.

Conflicts of Interest



E. P. and C. S. wrote the manuscript; J. F. C., G. F. F., R. P. R. and T. G. D. made substantial contributions to the overall content of the manuscript and all authors had responsibility for the final content.


1. Ley, RE, Turnbaugh, PJ, Klein, S et al. (2006) Microbial ecology – human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444, 10221023.
2. Qin, JJ, Li, RQ, Raes, J et al. (2010) A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–U70.
3. Backhed, F, Ding, H, Wang, T et al. (2004) The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 1571815723.
4. Maynard, CL, Elson, CO, Hatton, RD et al. (2012) Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature 489, 231241.
5. Marques, TM, Wall, R, Ross, RP et al. (2010) Programming infant gut microbiota: influence of dietary and environmental factors. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21, 149156.
6. Bouhnik, Y, Alain, S, Attar, A et al. (1999) Bacterial populations contaminating the upper gut in patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 94, 13271331.
7. Riordan, SM, McIver, CJ, Wakefield, D et al. (2001) Small intestinal mucosal immunity and morphometry in luminal overgrowth of indigenous gut flora. Am J Gastroenterol 96, 494500.
8. Maes, M, Kubera, M, Leunis, JC et al. (2013) In depression, bacterial translocation may drive inflammatory responses, oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS), and autoimmune responses directed against O&NS-damaged neoepitopes. Acta Psychiatr Scand 127, 344354.
9. Teltschik, Z, Wiest, R, Beisner, J et al. (2012) Intestinal bacterial translocation in rats with cirrhosis is related to compromised Paneth cell antimicrobial host defense. Hepatology 55, 11541163.
10. Koenig, JE, Spor, A, Scalfone, N et al. (2011) Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, Suppl. 1, 45784585.
11. Scholtens, PAMJ, Oozeer, R, Martin, R et al. (2012) The early settlers: intestinal microbiology in early life. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 3, 425447.
12. Butel, MJ, Suau, A, Campeotto, F et al. (2007) Conditions of bifidobacterial colonization in preterm infants: a prospective analysis. J Pediatr Gastr Nutr 44, 577582.
13. Dominguez-Bello, MG, Costello, EK, Contreras, M et al. (2010) Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 1197111975.
14. Bezirtzoglou, E, Tsiotsias, A & Welling, GW (2011) Microbiota profile in feces of breast- and formula-fed newborns by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Anaerobe 17, 478482.
15. Fallani, M, Young, D, Scott, J et al. (2010) Intestinal microbiota of 6-week-old infants across Europe: geographic influence beyond delivery mode, breast-feeding, and antibiotics. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 51, 7784.
16. Hallab, JC, Leach, ST, Zhang, L et al. (2013) Molecular characterization of bacterial colonization in the preterm and term infant's intestine. Indian J Pediatr 80, 15.
17. Fouhy, F, Guinane, CM, Hussey, S et al. (2012) High-throughput sequencing reveals the incomplete, short-term recovery of infant gut microbiota following parenteral antibiotic treatment with ampicillin and gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56, 58115820.
18. Hussey, S, Wall, R, Gruffman, E et al. (2011) Parenteral antibiotics reduce bifidobacteria colonization and diversity in neonates. Int J Microbiol; available at
19. Palmer, C, Bik, EM, DiGiulio, DB et al. (2007) Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol 5, 15561573.
20. Penders, J, Thijs, C, Vink, C et al. (2006) Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy. Pediatrics 118, 511521.
21. Huurre, A, Kalliomaki, M, Rautava, S et al. (2008) Mode of delivery – effects on gut microbiota and humoral immunity. Neonatology 93, 236240.
22. Fallani, M, Amarri, S, Uusijarvi, A et al. (2011) Determinants of the human infant intestinal microbiota after the introduction of first complementary foods in infant samples from five European centres. Microbiology 157, 13851392.
23. Yatsunenko, T, Rey, FE, Manary, MJ et al. (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222227.
24. Kurokawa, K, Itoh, T, Kuwahara, T et al. (2007) Comparative metagenomics revealed commonly enriched gene sets in human gut microbiomes. DNA Res 14, 169181.
25. Turnbaugh, PJ, Ridaura, VK, Faith, JJ et al. (2009) The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med 1; available at
26. Guinane, CM & Cotter, PD (2013) Role of the gut microbiota in health and chronic gastrointestinal disease: understanding a hidden metabolic organ. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 6, 295308.
27. Vyas, U & Ranganathan, N (2012) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: gut and beyond. Gastroenterol Res Pract; available at
28. Sanders, ME, Guarner, F, Guerrant, R et al. (2013) An update on the use and investigation of probiotics in health and disease. Gut 62, 787796.
29. FAO/WHO EC (2001) Report of a Joint Expert Consultation. Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk and Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. http://wwwfaoorg/es/ESN/Probio/report
30. Cappello, C, Tremolaterra, F, Pascariello, A et al. (2013) A randomised clinical trial (RCT) of a symbiotic mixture in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): effects on symptoms, colonic transit and quality of life. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 349358.
31. Whelan, K & Quigley, EM (2013) Probiotics in the management of irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 29, 184189.
32. Hempel, S, Newberry, SJ, Maher, AR et al. (2012) Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 307, 19591969.
33. Hickson, M (2011) Probiotics in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and Clostridium difficile infection. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 4, 185197.
34. Marques, TM, Cryan, JF, Shanahan, F et al. (2013) Gut microbiota modulation and implications for host health: dietary strategies to influence the gut–brain axis. Innov Food Sci Emerging Technol 22, 239247.
35. Saulnier, DM, Spinler, JK, Gibson, GR et al. (2009) Mechanisms of probiosis and prebiosis: considerations for enhanced functional foods. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20, 135141.
36. Preidis, GA & Versalovic, J (2009) Targeting the human microbiome with antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics: gastroenterology enters the metagenomics era. Gastroenterology 136, 20152031.
37. Hansen, CHF, Nielsen, DS, Kverka, M et al. (2012) Patterns of early gut colonization shape future immune responses of the host. PLoS ONE 7, e34043.
38. Moreau, MC, Ducluzeau, R, Guy-Grand, D et al. (1978) Increase in the population of duodenal immunoglobulin A plasmocytes in axenic mice associated with different living or dead bacterial strains of intestinal origin. Infect Immun 21, 532539.
39. Macpherson, AJ & Harris, NL (2004) Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 4, 478485.
40. Falk, PG, Hooper, LV, Midtvedt, T et al. (1998) Creating and maintaining the gastrointestinal ecosystem: what we know and need to know from gnotobiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 11571170.
41. Pollard, M & Sharon, N (1970) Responses of the Peyer's patches in germ-free mice to antigenic stimulation. Infect Immun 2, 96100.
42. Hoshi, H, Aijima, H, Horie, K et al. (1992) Lymph follicles and germinal centers in popliteal lymph nodes and other lymphoid tissues of germ-free and conventional rats. Tohoku J Exp Med 166, 297307.
43. Round, JL & Mazmanian, SK (2009) The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease (vol 9, pg 313, 2009). Nat Rev Immunol 9, 600600.
44. Imaoka, A, Matsumoto, S, Setoyama, H et al. (1996) Proliferative recruitment of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes after microbial colonization of germ-free mice. Eur J Immunol 26, 945948.
45. Umesaki, Y, Setoyama, H, Matsumoto, S et al. (1993) Expansion of alpha beta T-cell receptor-bearing intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes after microbial colonization in germ-free mice and its independence from thymus. Immunology 79, 3237.
46. Abrams, GD, Bauer, H & Sprinz, H (1963) Influence of the normal flora on mucosal morphology and cellular renewal in the ileum. A comparison of germ-free and conventional mice. Lab Invest 12, 355364.
47. Sprinz, H, Kundel, DW, Dammin, GJ et al. (1961) The response of the germfree guinea pig to oral bacterial challenge with Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri . Am J Pathol 39, 681695.
48. Zachar, Z & Savage, DC (1979) Microbial interference and colonization of the murine gastrointestinal-tract by Listeria monocytogenes . Infect Immun 23, 168174.
49. Hooper, LV & Macpherson, AJ (2010) Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat Rev Immunol 10, 159169.
50. Mazmanian, SK, Round, JL & Kasper, DL (2008) A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature 453, 620625.
51. Mazmanian, SK, Liu, CH, Tzianabos, AO et al. (2005) An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 122, 107118.
52. Lepage, P, Hasler, R, Spehlmann, ME et al. (2011) Twin study indicates loss of interaction between microbiota and mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 141, 227236.
53. Martinez, C, Antolin, M, Santos, J et al. (2008) Unstable composition of the fecal microbiota in ulcerative colitis during clinical remission. Am J Gastroenterol 103, 643648.
54. Manichanh, C, Borruel, N, Casellas, F et al. (2012) The gut microbiota in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9, 599608.
55. Morgan, XC, Tickle, TL, Sokol, H et al. (2012) Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol 13, R79.
56. Manichanh, C, Rigottier-Gois, L, Bonnaud, E et al. (2006) Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn's disease revealed by a metagenomic approach. Gut 55, 205211.
57. Sokol, H, Seksik, P, Rigottier-Gois, L et al. (2006) Specificities of the fecal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 12, 106111.
58. Clayton, EM, Rea, MC, Shanahan, F et al. (2009) The vexed relationship between Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: an assessment of carriage in an outpatient setting among patients in remission. Am J Gastroenterol 104, 11621169.
59. Larsen, N, Vogensen, FK, van den Berg, FW et al. (2012) Gut microbiota in human adults with type 2 diabetes differs from non-diabetic adults. PLoS ONE 5, e9085.
60. Qin, J, Li, Y, Cai, Z et al. (2012) A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 5560.
61. Roesch, LF, Lorca, GL, Casella, G et al. (2009) Culture-independent identification of gut bacteria correlated with the onset of diabetes in a rat model. ISME J 3, 536548.
62. Brown, CT, Davis-Richardson, AG, Giongo, A et al. (2011) Gut microbiome metagenomics analysis suggests a functional model for the development of autoimmunity for type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE 6, e25792.
63. Giongo, A, Gano, KA, Crabb, DB et al. (2011) Toward defining the autoimmune microbiome for type 1 diabetes. ISME J 5, 8291.
64. de Goffau, MC, Luopajarvi, K, Knip, M et al. (2013) Fecal microbiota composition differs between children with beta-cell autoimmunity and those without. Diabetes 62, 12381244.
65. Ley, RE (2010) Obesity and the human microbiome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 26, 511.
66. Ley, RE, Backhed, F, Turnbaugh, P et al. (2005) Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 1107011075.
67. Tilg, H & Kaser, A (2011) Gut microbiome, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction. J Clin Invest 121, 21262132.
68. Turnbaugh, PJ, Ley, RE, Mahowald, MA et al. (2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444, 10271031.
69. Schwiertz, A, Taras, D, Schafer, K et al. (2010) Microbiota and SCFA in lean and overweight healthy subjects. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18, 190195.
70. Murphy, EF, Cotter, PD, Healy, S et al. (2010) Composition and energy harvesting capacity of the gut microbiota: relationship to diet, obesity and time in mouse models. Gut 59, 16351642.
71. Cani, PD, Amar, J, Iglesias, MA et al. (2007) Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 56, 17611772.
72. Cani, PD, Bibiloni, R, Knauf, C et al. (2008) Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation in high-fat diet-induced obesity and diabetes in mice. Diabetes 57, 14701481.
73. Vance, DE (2008) Role of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis in the regulation of lipoprotein homeostasis. Curr Opin Lipidol 19, 229234.
74. Dumas, ME, Barton, RH, Toye, A et al. (2006) Metabolic profiling reveals a contribution of gut microbiota to fatty liver phenotype in insulin-resistant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 1251112516.
75. Prentiss, PG, Rosen, H, Brown, N et al. (1961) The metabolism of choline by the germfree rat. Arch Biochem Biophys 94, 424429.
76. Wang, Z, Klipfell, E, Bennett, BJ et al. (2011) Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 472, 5763.
77. Tang, WHW, Wang, ZE, Levison, BS et al. (2013) Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk. New Engl J Med 368, 15751584.
78. Shanahan, F (2009) Therapeutic implications of manipulatingand mining the microbiota. J Physiol 587, 41754179.
79. Said, HM (2011) Intestinal absorption of water-soluble vitamins in health and disease. Biochem J 437, 357372.
80. Wall, R, Ross, RP, Shanahan, F et al. (2009) Metabolic activity of the enteric microbiota influences the fatty acid composition of murine and porcine liver and adipose tissues. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 13931401.
81. Wall, R, Marques, TM, O'Sullivan, O et al. (2012) Contrasting effects of Bifidobacterium breve NCIMB 702258 and Bifidobacterium breve DPC 6330 on the composition of murine brain fatty acids and gut microbiota. Am J Clin Nutr 95, 12781287.
82. Barrett, E, Fitzgerald, P, Dinan, TG et al. (2012) Bifidobacterium breve with alpha-linolenic acid and linoleic acid alters fatty acid metabolism in the Maternal Separation Model of Irritable Bowel Syndrome. PLoS ONE 7, e48159.
83. Hennessy, AA, Barrett, E, Ross, RP et al. (2012) The production of conjugated alpha-linolenic, gamma-linolenic and stearidonic acids by strains of bifidobacteria and propionibacteria. Lipids 47, 313327.
84. Lee, HY, Park, JH, Seok, SH et al. (2006) Human originated bacteria, Lactobacillus rhamnosus PL60, produce conjugated linoleic acid and show anti-obesity effects in diet-induced obese mice. Biochim Biophys Acta 1761, 736744.
85. Lee, K, Paek, K, Lee, HY et al. (2007) Antiobesity effect of trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid-producing Lactobacillus plantarum PL62 on diet-induced obese mice. J Appl Microbiol 103, 11401146.
86. Wall, R, Ross, RP, Shanahan, F et al. (2010) Impact of administered bifidobacterium on murine host fatty acid composition. Lipids 45, 429436.
87. Nakajima, H, Suzuki, Y, Kaizu, H et al. (1992) Cholesterol lowering activity of ropy fermented milk. J Food Sci 57, 13271329.
88. Vinderola, G, Perdigon, G, Duarte, J et al. (2006) Effects of the oral administration of the exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens on the gut mucosal immunity. Cytokine 36, 254260.
89. Ko, CY, Lin, HTV & Tsai, GJ (2013) Gamma-aminobutyric acid production in black soybean milk by Lactobacillus brevis FPA 3709 and the antidepressant effect of the fermented product on a forced swimming rat model. Process Biochem 48, 559568.
90. Bravo, JA, Forsythe, P, Chew, MV et al. (2011) Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 1605016055.
91. Desbonnet, L, Garrett, L, Clarke, G et al. (2008) The probiotic Bifidobacteria infantis: an assessment of potential antidepressant properties in the rat. J Psychiatr Res 43, 164174.
92. LeBlanc, JG, Milani, C, de Giori, GS et al. (2013) Bacteria as vitamin suppliers to their host: a gut microbiota perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol 24, 160168.
93. Deguchi, Y, Morishita, T & Mutai, M (1985) Comparative studies on synthesis of water-soluble vitamins among human species of Bifidobacteria . Agric Biol Chem Tokyo 49, 1319.
94. Noda, H, Akasaka, N & Ohsugi, M (1994) Biotin production by Bifidobacteria . J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 40, 181188.
95. Pompei, A, Cordisco, L, Amaretti, A et al. (2007) Folate production by Bifidobacteria as a potential probiotic property. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 179185.
96. Szulc, P, Arlot, M, Chapuy, MC et al. (1994) Serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin correlates with hip bone mineral density in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 9, 15911595.
97. Knapen, MH, Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman, AC, Wouters, RS et al. (1998) Correlation of serum osteocalcin fractions with bone mineral density in women during the first 10 years after menopause. Calcif Tissue Int 63, 375379.
98. Szulc, P, Chapuy, MC, Meunier, PJ et al. (1993) Serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin Is a marker of the risk of hip fracture in elderly women. J Clin Invest 91, 17691774.
99. Luukinen, H, Kakonen, SM, Pettersson, K et al. (2000) Strong prediction of fractures among older adults by the ratio of carboxylated to total serum osteocalcin. J Bone Miner Res 15, 24732478.
100. Geleijnse, JM, Vermeer, C, Grobbee, DE et al. (2004) Dietary intake of menaquinone is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease: the Rotterdam Study. J Nutr 134, 31003105.
101. Roessner, CA, Huang, KX, Warren, MJ et al. (2002) Isolation and characterization of 14 additional genes specifying the anaerobic biosynthesis of cobalamin (vitamin B12) in Propionibacterium freudenreichii (P. shermanii). Microbiology 148, 18451853.
102. Taranto, MP, Vera, JL, Hugenholtz, J et al. (2003) Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1098 produces cobalamin. J Bacteriol 185, 56435647.
103. Saulnier, DM, Santos, F, Roos, S et al. (2011) Exploring metabolic pathway reconstruction and genome-wide expression profiling in Lactobacillus reuteri to define functional probiotic features. PLoS ONE 6, e18783.
104. Klaassens, ES, Boesten, RJ, Haarman, M et al. (2009) Mixed-species genomic microarray analysis of fecal samples reveals differential transcriptional responses of bifidobacteria in breast- and formula-fed infants. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 26682676.
105. Klaassens, ES, Ben-Amor, K, Vriesema, A et al. (2011) The fecal bifidobacterial transcriptome of adults: a microarray approach. Gut Microbes 2, 217226.
106. Gosalbes, MJ, Durban, A, Pignatelli, M et al. (2011) Metatranscriptomic approach to analyze the functional human gut microbiota. PLoS ONE 6, e17447.
107. Belury, MA (2002) Inhibition of carcinogenesis by conjugated linoleic acid: potential mechanisms of action. J Nutr 132, 29952998.
108. Benjamin, S & Spener, F (2009) Conjugated linoleic acids as functional food: an insight into their health benefits. Nutr Metab (Lond) 6, 36.
109. Bhattacharya, A, Banu, J, Rahman, M et al. (2006) Biological effects of conjugated linoleic acids in health and disease. J Nutr Biochem 17, 789810.
110. Brownbill, RA, Petrosian, M & Ilich, JZ (2005) Association between dietary conjugated linoleic acid and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Am Coll Nutr 24, 177181.
111. Chin, SF, Storkson, JM, Albright, KJ et al. (1994) Conjugated linoleic acid is a growth factor for rats as shown by enhanced weight gain and improved feed efficiency. J Nutr 124, 23442349.
112. Churruca, I, Fernandez-Quintela, A & Portillo, MP (2009) Conjugated linoleic acid isomers: differences in metabolism and biological effects. Biofactors 35, 105111.
113. Jaudszus, A, Foerster, M, Kroegel, C et al. (2005) Cis-9, trans-11-CLA exerts anti-inflammatory effects in human bronchial epithelial cells and eosinophils: comparison to trans-10, cis-12-CLA and to linoleic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta 1737, 111118.
114. Kelley, NS, Hubbard, NE & Erickson, KL (2007) Conjugated linoleic acid isomers and cancer. J Nutr 137, 25992607.
115. Nagao, K & Yanagita, T (2005) Conjugated fatty acids in food and their health benefits. J Biosci Bioeng 100, 152157.
116. Pariza, MW, Park, Y & Cook, ME (2001) The biologically active isomers of conjugated linoleic acid. Prog Lipid Res 40, 283298.
117. Silveira, MB, Carraro, R, Monereo, S et al. (2007) Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and obesity. Public Health Nutr 10, 11811186.
118. Valeille, K, Ferezou, J, Parquet, M et al. (2006) The natural concentration of the conjugated linoleic acid, cis-9, trans-11, in milk fat has antiatherogenic effects in hyperlipidemic hamsters. J Nutr 136, 13051310.
119. Watras, AC, Buchholz, AC, Close, RN et al. (2007) The role of conjugated linoleic acid in reducing body fat and preventing holiday weight gain. Int J Obes (Lond) 31, 481487.
120. Mele, MC, Cannelli, G, Carta, G et al. (2013) Metabolism of c9, t11-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in humans. Prostag Leukotr Ess 89, 115119.
121. Coakley, M, Ross, RP, Nordgren, M et al. (2003) Conjugated linoleic acid biosynthesis by human-derived Bifidobacterium species. J Appl Microbiol 94, 138145.
122. Rosberg-Cody, E, Ross, RP, Hussey, S et al. (2004) Mining the microbiota of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract for conjugated linoleic acid-producing bifidobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 46354641.
123. Nobre, ME, Correia, AO, Borges Mde, B et al. (2013) Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid exert anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects in rodents at low doses. Nutr Res 33, 422433.
124. Hu, GX, Chen, GR, Xu, H et al. (2010) Activation of the AMP activated protein kinase by short-chain fatty acids is the main mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of a high fiber diet on the metabolic syndrome. Med Hypotheses 74, 123126.
125. Gao, Z, Yin, J, Zhang, J et al. (2009) Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice. Diabetes 58, 15091517.
126. Blouin, JM, Penot, G, Collinet, M et al. (2011) Butyrate elicits a metabolic switch in human colon cancer cells by targeting the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Int J Cancer 128, 25912601.
127. Scharlau, D, Borowicki, A, Habermann, N et al. (2009) Mechanisms of primary cancer prevention by butyrate and other products formed during gut flora-mediated fermentation of dietary fibre. Mutat Res 682, 3953.
128. Tang, Y, Chen, Y, Jiang, H et al. (2011) G-protein-coupled receptor for short-chain fatty acids suppresses colon cancer. Int J Cancer 128, 847856.
129. Harig, JM, Soergel, KH, Komorowski, RA et al. (1989) Treatment of diversion colitis with short-chain-fatty acid irrigation. N Engl J Med 320, 2328.
130. Breuer, RI, Buto, SK, Christ, ML et al. (1991) Rectal irrigation with short-chain fatty acids for distal ulcerative colitis. Preliminary report. Dig Dis Sci 36, 185187.
131. Vernia, P, Marcheggiano, A, Caprilli, R et al. (1995) Short-chain fatty acid topical treatment in distal ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 9, 309313.
132. Scheppach, W (1996) Treatment of distal ulcerative colitis with short-chain fatty acid enemas. A placebo-controlled trial. German-Austrian SCFA Study Group. Dig Dis Sci 41, 22542259.
133. Di Sabatino, A, Morera, R, Ciccocioppo, R et al. (2005) Oral butyrate for mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22, 789794.
134. den Besten, G, van Eunen, K, Groen, AK et al. (2013) The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res 54, 23252340.
135. Donohoe, DR, Garge, N, Zhang, X et al. (2011) The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon. Cell Metab 13, 517526.
136. Tremaroli, V & Backhed, F (2012) Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489, 242249.
137. Maslowski, KM, Vieira, AT, Ng, A et al. (2009) Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature 461, 12821286.
138. Sina, C, Gavrilova, O, Forster, M et al. (2009) G protein-coupled receptor 43 is essential for neutrophil recruitment during intestinal inflammation. J Immunol 183, 75147522.
139. Tolhurst, G, Heffron, H, Lam, YS et al. (2012) Short-chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion via the G-protein-coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes 61, 364371.
140. Stack, HM, Kearney, N, Stanton, C et al. (2010) Association of beta-glucan endogenous production with increased stress tolerance of intestinal lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol 76, 500507.
141. Kitazawa, H, Harata, T, Uemura, J et al. (1998) Phosphate group requirement for mitogenic activation of lymphocytes by an extracellular phosphopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. Int J Food Microbiol 40, 169175.
142. Maeda, H, Zhu, X, Omura, K et al. (2004) Effects of an exopolysaccharide (kefiran) on lipids, blood pressure, blood glucose, and constipation. Biofactors 22, 197200.
143. Korakli, M, Ganzle, MG & Vogel, RF (2002) Metabolism by bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria of polysaccharides from wheat and rye, and exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis . J Appl Microbiol 92, 958965.
144. O'Connor, E, Barrett, E, Fitzgerald, G et al. (2005) Production of vitamins, exopolysaccharides and bacteriocins by probiotic bacteria. Probiotic Dairy Products 167194.
145. Theuwissen, E & Mensink, RP (2008) Water-soluble dietary fibers and cardiovascular disease. Physiol Behav 94, 285292.
146. Akramiene, D, Kondrotas, A, Didziapetriene, J et al. (2007) Effects of beta-glucans on the immune system. Medicina 43, 597606.
147. Hida, TH, Ishibashi, K, Miura, NN et al. (2009) Cytokine induction by a linear 1,3-glucan, curdlan-oligo, in mouse leukocytes in vitro . Inflamm Res 58, 914.
148. Tsoni, SV & Brown, GD (2008) Beta-glucans and Dectin-1. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1143, 4560.
149. Volman, JJ, Ramakers, JD & Plat, J (2008) Dietary modulation of immune function by beta-glucans. Physiol Behav 94, 276284.
150. Wilson, TA, Nicolosi, RJ, Delaney, B et al. (2004) Reduced and high molecular weight barley beta-glucans decrease plasma total and non-HDL-cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic Syrian golden hamsters. J Nutr 134, 26172622.
151. Shin, HD, Yang, KJ, Park, BR et al. (2007) Antiosteoporotic effect of polycan, beta-glucan from Aureobasidium, in ovariectomized osteoporotic mice. Nutrition 23, 853860.
152. Gu, Y, Fujimiya, Y, Itokawa, Y et al. (2008) Tumoricidal effects of beta-glucans: mechanisms include both antioxidant activity plus enhanced systemic and topical immunity. Nutr Cancer 60, 685691.
153. Mantovani, MS, Bellini, MF, Angeli, JP et al. (2008) Beta-glucans in promoting health: prevention against mutation and cancer. Mutat Res 658, 154161.
154. Beck, EJ, Tapsell, LC, Batterham, MJ et al. (2009) Increases in peptide Y–Y levels following oat beta-glucan ingestion are dose-dependent in overweight adults. Nutr Res 29, 705709.
155. Beck, EJ, Tosh, SM, Batterham, MJ et al. (2009) Oat beta-glucan increases postprandial cholecystokinin levels, decreases insulin response and extends subjective satiety in overweight subjects. Mol Nutr Food Res 53, 13431351.
156. Fanning, S, Hall, LJ & van Sinderen, D (2012) Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 surface exopolysaccharide production is a beneficial trait mediating commensal-host interaction through immune modulation and pathogen protection. Gut Microbes 3, 420425.
157. Collins, SM, Surette, M & Bercik, P (2012) The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain. Nat Rev Microbiol 10, 735742.
158. Forsythe, P, Sudo, N, Dinan, T et al. (2010) Mood and gut feelings. Brain Behav Immun 24, 916.
159. Neufeld, KM, Kang, N, Bienenstock, J et al. (2011) Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 23, 255264, e119.
160. Sudo, N, Chida, Y, Aiba, Y et al. (2004) Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol 558, 263275.
161. de Theije, CGM, Wu, JB, da Silva, SL et al. (2011) Pathways underlying the gut-to-brain connection in autism spectrum disorders as future targets for disease management. Eur J Pharmacol 668, S70S80.
162. Desbonnet, L, Clarke, G, Shanahan, F et al. (2013) Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol Psychiatry 19, 146148.
163. Finegold, SM, Dowd, SE, Gontcharova, V et al. (2010) Pyrosequencing study of fecal microflora of autistic and control children. Anaerobe 16, 444453.
164. Heijtza, RD, Wang, SG, Anuar, F et al. (2011) Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 30473052.
165. Clarke, G, Grenham, S, Scully, P et al. (2013) The microbiome–gut–brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol Psychiatry 18, 666673.
166. Messaoudi, M, Lalonde, R, Violle, N et al. (2011) Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects. Br J Nutr 105, 755764.
167. Hsiao, EY, McBride, SW, Hsien, S et al. (2013) Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 155, 14511463.
168. Henriksen, C, Haugholt, K, Lindgren, M et al. (2008) Improved cognitive development among preterm infants attributable to early supplementation of human milk with docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid. Pediatrics 121, 11371145.
169. Yurko-Mauro, K, McCarthy, D, Rom, D et al. (2010) Beneficial effects of docosahexaenoic acid on cognition in age-related cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement 6, 456464.
170. Dinan, TG, Stanton, C & Cryan, JF (2013) Psychobiotics: a novel class of psychotropic. Biol Psychiatry 74, 720726.
171. Cryan, JF & O'Mahony, SM (2011) The microbiome–gut–brain axis: from bowel to behavior. Neurogastroenterol Motil 23, 187192.
172. Cryan, JF & Kaupmann, K (2005) Don't worry ‘B’ happy!: a role for GABA(B) receptors in anxiety and depression. Trends Pharmacol Sci 26, 3643.
173. Schousboe, A & Waagepetersen, HS (2007) GABA: homeostatic and pharmacological aspects. Prog Brain Res 160, 919.
174. Komatsuzaki, N, Nakamura, T, Kimura, T et al. (2008) Characterization of glutamate decarboxylase from a high gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-producer, Lactobacillus paracasei . Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72, 278285.
175. Higuchi, T, Hayashi, H & Abe, K (1997) Exchange of glutamate and gamma-aminobutyrate in a Lactobacillus strain. J Bacteriol 179, 33623364.
176. Barrett, E, Ross, RP, O'Toole, PW et al. (2012) Gamma-aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine. J Appl Microbiol 113, 411417.
177. Wikoff, WR, Anfora, AT, Liu, J et al. (2009) Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 36983703.
178. O'Mahony, SM, Marchesi, JR, Scully, P et al. (2009) Early life stress alters behavior, immunity, and microbiota in rats: implications for irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric illnesses. Biol Psychiatry 65, 263267.
179. Bailey, MT & Coe, CL (1999) Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev Psychobiol 35, 146155.
180. Tsavkelova, EA, Botvinko, IV, Kudrin, VS et al. (2000) Detection of neurotransmitter amines in microorganisms with the use of high-performance liquid chromatography. Dokl Biochem 372, 115117.
181. Asano, Y, Hiramoto, T, Nishino, R et al. (2012) Critical role of gut microbiota in the production of biologically active, free catecholamines in the gut lumen of mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303, G1288G1295.
182. Girvin, GT & Stevenson, JW (1954) Cell free choline acetylase from Lactobacillus plantarum . Can J Biochem Physiol 32, 131146.
183. Rowatt, E (1948) The relation of pantothenic acid to acetylcholine formation by a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum . J Gen Microbiol 2, 2530.
184. Horiuchi, Y, Kimura, R, Kato, N et al. (2003) Evolutional study on acetylcholine expression. Life Sci 72, 17451756.
185. Cryan, JF & Dinan, TG (2012) Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 13, 701712.