Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:20:21.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food choice motives of Royal Navy personnel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

A.M. Shaw
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, PO12 2DL Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ
T. Davey
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, PO12 2DL
A.J. Allsopp
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, PO12 2DL
E.L. Parsons
Affiliation:
Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD.
S.A. Wootton
Affiliation:
Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD.
J.L. Fallowfield
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, PO12 2DL
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

The United Kingdom Armed Forces are not exempt from the obesity epidemic(Reference Wood1). This is of concern due to the health, occupational and economic risks that it poses. Poor dietary habits and physical inactivity have traditionally been identified as major factors associated with overweight and obesity(Reference Prentice and Jebb2), where understanding the factors influencing an individual's food choice decisions may help inform interventions to improve dietary behaviours and hence tackle obesity. Thus, the present study investigated the motives for food choice of Royal Navy (RN) personnel.

A stratified convenience sample of n 600 RN personnel (males 52 %, females 48 %), mean (SD) age 29 (8) years (n 201 aged 18–24 years, n 246 aged 25–34 years, n 153 ⩾35 years) volunteered to participate in the study between May 2012 and January 2013. Participants completed a motives for food choice questionnaire(Reference Steptoe, Pollard and Wardle3), demographics questionnaire and had their height, body weight and waist circumference measured. Risk of obesity-related diseases, according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) was determined(4).

The highest rated motives for food choice were Sensory Appeal, Health and Price. The lowest rated factors were Familiarity and Ethical Concern. Female participants were more likely to be motivated by Sensory Appeal, Weight Control, Convenience and Mood compared with male participants (P < 0·05; Table 1).

Table 1.

* P < 0·05 difference to females; † P < 0·05 difference to ⩾35 year age group; ‡ P < 0·05 difference to 25–34 year age group.

Participants aged 18–24 years old rated Mood higher and Sensory Appeal, Ethical Concern and Natural Content lower compared with participants aged ⩾35 years old (P < 0·05; Table 1). Participants in the 25–34 year age group rated Sensory Appeal lower and Natural Content higher compared with participants in the ⩾35 and 18–24 year age groups, respectively (P < 0·05; Table 1).

Participants classified as being at any increased risk of obesity-related diseases rated Health lower compared with participants at no increased risk (2·6 [0·7] vs. 2·8 [0·7], P < 0·05).

In conclusion, the findings from the present study suggest that interventions to improve the dietary behaviours of RN personnel should be targeted based on demographic factors and NICE risk classification, rather than adopting a “one size fits all” approach.

© Crown Copyright (MOD) 2018: Published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO.

References

1.Wood, P (2007) Dstl Report No.: TR27252. Dstl, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
2.Prentice, AM & Jebb, SA (1995) BMJ. 311, 437.Google Scholar
3.Steptoe, A, Pollard, RM & Wardle, J (1995) Appetite. 25(3), 267284.Google Scholar
4.NICE (2014) NICE guidelines CG189. NICE, London, UK.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1.