Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T08:51:28.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactive effects of selection for growth and protein supply on the consequences of gastrointestinal parasitism on growth performance in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

J.G.M. Houdijk*
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Health Team, SAC, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom
L. Bünger
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Development Team, SAC, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The consequence of sub-clinical gastrointestinal parasitism in farm animals, i.e. reduced food intake and growth, is often more pronounced in breeds with a high production potential compared with breeds with a low one (Houdijk et al., 2001). It cannot be excluded that such differences in disease resistance may arise from between-breed differences in genetic resistance to parasites rather than production potential per se, as within-breed selected farm animals with sufficiently different production potentials are not readily available. However, appropriately selected mouse lines are available (Bünger et al., 2001) to explore the hypothesis that selection for growth may reduce the animal’s capacity to cope with pathogens. We have recently shown in mice divergently selected for growth potential that in some lines, the absolute penalty of sub-clinical parasitism on high growth mice was higher than in their low growth counterparts (Houdijk and Bünger, 2006). Here, we test the hypothesis that this penalty on growth in one of these lines can be reduced through increased protein supply.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bünger, L., Laidlaw, A.H., Bulfield, G., Eisen, E.J., Medrano, J.F., Bradford, G.E., Pirchner, F., Renne, U., Schlote, W. and Hill, W.G. (2001). Inbred lines of mice derived from long-term growth selected lines: unique respources for mapping growth genes. Mammalian Genome 12: 678–686.Google Scholar
Houdijk, J.G.M., Jessop, N.S. and Kyriazakis, I. (2001). Nutrient partitioning between reproductive and immune functions in animals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 60: 515–525.Google Scholar
Houdijk, J.G.M. and Bünger, L. (2006). Selection for growth increases the penalty of parasitism on growth performance in mice. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society (in press).Google Scholar