Many state and local emergency medical services (EMS) systems may wish to modify provider levels and their scope of practice to align their systems with the recommendations of the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint. To determine any changes that may be needed in a typical EMS system, the knowledge and skills of EMS providers in one rural area of North Carolina were compared with the knowledge and skills recommended in the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint.

A survey listing 175 items of patient care-oriented knowledge and skills described in the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint was developed. EMS providers from five rural eastern North Carolina counties were asked to identify on the survey those items of knowledge and skills they believed they possessed. The skills and knowledge selected by the respondents at the five different North Carolina levels of certification were compared with the knowledge and skills listed for comparable provider levels delineated by the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint. The proportions of the recommended skills reported to be possessed by the respondents were compared to determine which North Carolina certification levels best correlate with the Blueprint.

One hundred forty-five EMS providers completed the survey. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) ranked significantly lower than did the skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in five of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Defibrillator-level personnel ranked lower than did those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in seven of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Intermediates ranked lower than did those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in nine of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Advanced Intermediates ranked lower than were the skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in two of the 10 Blueprint elements. Finally, the proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Paramedics ranked lower than were those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in one of the 10 Blueprint elements.

In North Carolina, combining the EMT and EMT-Defibrillator levels and eliminating the EMT-Intermediate level would create three levels of certification, which would be more consistent with levels recommended by the Blueprint. The results of this study should be considered in any effort to revise the levels of EMS certification in North Carolina and in planning the training curricula for bridging those levels. Other states may require similar action to align with the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint.

The use of direct medical control (DMC) in the out-of-hospital setting often is beneficial, but has the disadvantage of consuming emergency medical services (EMS) resources.

Uncomplicated, nontrauma, adult patients with chest pain can be treated safely and transported by paramedics without DMC.

Retrospective chart review of all nontrauma, adult patients with chest pain treated in a combined rural and suburban EMS system during a 2-year period (December 1990 through November 1992) was conducted. Before November 1991, DMC was mandatory for all patients with chest pain. Beginning 01 November 1991, if a patient had resolution of pain either spontaneously, with administration of oxygen, or after a single dose of nitroglycerin, DMC was at the discretion of the paramedic. Using the above criteria for inclusion, three study groups were defined: Group 1, before protocol change; Group 2, after protocol change without DMC; and Group 3, after protocol change when physician contact was obtained, but not required. These groups were compared for the following parameters: 1) scene time; 2) time to administration of first dose of nitroglycerin; 3) time interval between measurement of vital signs; 4) oxygen use; 5) intravenous access; and 6) electrocardiographic monitoring. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed by multivariate and univariate analysis of variance and chi-square tests, respectively.

Of 308 nontrauma, adult patients with chest pain, 71 met inclusion criteria in Group 1, 40 in Group 2, and 34 in Group 3. No statistically significant differences were identified in any of the study parameters.

Adult patients with chest pain who have no other symptoms or complicating conditions can be treated appropriately by paramedics without DMC.

Rapid transport from scene to closest trauma center requires optimal use of public safety first responder (FR), basic life support (BLS), advanced life support (ALS), and transport resources (ground or air). In some parts of this regional emergency medical services (EMS) system, on-scene ALS requires contact with on-line medical command (OLMC) to obtain authorization for air medical helicopter (AMH) dispatch, because some EMS medical directors believe that this may decrease overutilization of AMH services.

The hypothesis of this study was that requiring prior OLMC for AMH dispatch prolongs mean time to a trauma center versus either FR or BLS request for AMH.

Computer mapping programs were used to model the most rapid driving time to the closest trauma center from 167 actual AMH responses to the scene of a motor vehicle accident. In an OLMC-ALS model, only OLMC-ALS can request an AMH. In a BLS model, BLS units arrive on the scene and the crew requests simultaneous dispatch of an ALS response and an AMH. In the FR model, on arrival at the scene, a FR requests simultaneous dispatch of a BLS unit, an ALS unit, and an AMH.

The OLMC-ALS model resulted in a longer mean value for time to trauma center by an AMH than did the computer model for all ground transport settings. The FR model yielded a shorter mean time for AMH compared with the mean values for time to trauma center for all settings. Differences in mean values for time in urban settings were small (ground: 42 minutes, air: 36 minutes), whereas those for the suburban (ground: 52 minutes, air: 41 minutes), and those for rural (ground: 69 minutes, air: 47 minutes) were significant clinically. For the BLS model, these differences persisted, but were significant clinically only in the rural setting (ground: 68 minutes, air: 53 minutes).

Optimal use of AMH requires balancing the need for early helicopter dispatch to fully exploit its speed advantage with the disadvantage of expensive overutilization. This computer model indicates that the best person to request AMH varies by venue: in urban settings, the OLMC physician should request AMH dispatch; in suburban venues, BLS should request AMH dispatch; and in rural venues, FRs should request AMH dispatch.

This paper describes the 1994 Northridge earthquake experience of the local emergency medical services (EMS) agency. Discussed are means that should improve future local agency disaster responses.

Data reported are descriptive and were collected from multiple independent sources, and can be reviewed publicly and confirmed. Validated data collected during the disaster by the Local EMS Agency also are reported.

The experience of the Los Angeles County EMS Agency was similar to that of earthquake disasters previously reported. Communication systems, water, food, shelter, sanitation means, power sources, and medical supplies were resources needed early in the disaster. Urban Search and Rescue Teams and Disaster Medical Assistance Teams were important elements in the response to the Northridge earthquake. The acute phase of the disaster ended within 48 to 72 hours and public health then became the predominant health-care issue. Locating community food and water supplies near shelters, providing transportation to medical care, and public-health visits to shelter locations helped prevent the development of long-term park encampments. An incident command system for the field, hospitals, and government responders was necessary for an organized response to the disaster.

Disaster preparedness, multiple forms of reliable communication, rapid mobilization of resources, and knowledge of available state and federal resources are necessary for a disaster response by a local EMS agency.

Triage of injured children poses a significant challenge for prehospital-care providers because there is no single trauma triage tool in use that has been developed specifically for children. The pediatric trauma score (PTS) probably is the single most studied and tested trauma triage tool developed solely for the pediatric population, and is an effective predictor of both severity of injury and potential mortality in injured children. However, the pediatric trauma score has been found to be an ineffective prehospital triage tool because it is not “user friendly” for field personnel. As such, the PTS has been modified to generate the more user-friendly ”pediatric trauma triage checklist (PTTC).”

This study retrospectively reviewed 106 prehospital run reports to determine whether the patient met one or more of the criteria in the PTTC. By applying the MacKenzie algorithm to outcome data for each case, it was possible to determine whether the patient should have been sent to a trauma center.

The PTTC demonstrated a sensitivity of 86.2%, a specificity of 41.6%, and an accuracy of 66.0%. The PTTC demonstrate an overtriage rate of 58.3% and an under-triage rate of 13.8%. When compared with a previous study, the PTTC demonstrated a 74 % increase in overtriage. However, the 59% reduction in undertriage is more important.

Use of the PTTC appears to have merit as a pediatric prehospital trauma triage tool but further study is recommended. The PTTC should be tested in a prospective, multiregional study involving a sample size sufficient to reach statistical significance.

To describe the epidemiology of pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) practice in a large patient population from several geographic areas.

Retrospective computer analysis of EMS databases from four states using a common data set and analysis system.

Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Nevada (except Clark County), 1990 through 1992.

All patient-care reports of patients 14 years old and younger were extracted from the EMS databases and analyzed for the following factors: age, gender, date, elapsed pre-hospital times, incident type, mechanism of injury, call disposition, illness or injuries encountered, severity of illness/injury (by abnormal vital signs), and basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) treatment delivered.

A total of 1,512,907 patient care reports were reviewed. Those of 61,132 children were extracted for analysis. These children comprised about 4% of prehospital responses. Male subjects predominated (56%), and children aged 7 through 14 years represented 46% of cases. Most calls occurred in the evening and daylight hours. Children were transported by ambulance in 89% of cases, and care was refused in 7.7%. Mean response time was 9±16 minutes, mean scene time 12±14 minutes, and mean transport time 14±20 minutes. Traumatic incidents predominated at 42%, with motor vehicle accidents and falls the most common mechanisms. Blunt injuries accounted for 94% of trauma, whereas respiratory problems, seizures, and poisoning/overdose were the most common medical problems. Vital signs were obtained in 56% of cases. Abnormal vital signs were noted in 21% of these, and the presumptive causes were similar in distribution to those of the general population, with the addition of cardiac arrest. The most commonly used treatments were spinal immobilization, oxygen administration, intravenous access and several ALS medications. An ALS capability was available in more than half the runs, but ALS treatment was delivered in only 14% of those cases. Outcome data were not available.

This multistate analysis of pediatric EMS epidemiology confirms findings reported in smaller regional studies, with several exceptions. Excessive scene times were not noted. Few children had serious disorders as evidenced by abnormal vital signs. An ALS treatment, when available, was used infrequently. These findings have implications for EMS planners and educators.

Many colleges and universities appear to exist in relative isolation from community-based emergency medical services (EMS) systems. In response, some have developed their own EMS systems.

To determine the extent of this phenomenon and to delineate the characteristics of these systems.

Questionnaires were mailed to 1,503 colleges/universities in the United States and Canada. The questionnaire asked whether the institution had an EMS system and included 19 questions about the characteristics of the system.

A total of 919 (61 %) responses were received. Of the institutions responding, 234 (25%) had an EMS system and 31 (3.4%) were considering starting a system. Characteristics of the systems were as follows: 1) Types of patients—the two most common call types were medical and trauma/surgical; 134 (57%) reported one-fourth of calls to be medical and 91 (39%) reported one-fourth of calls to be trauma/surgical. 2) Type of service—133 (57%) services transport patients; 195 (83%) respond only to the campus or other university property; the remainder also respond to the community; and 135 (58%) function all year. 3) Dispatch—178 (76%) are dispatched by the campus police, although most services are dispatched by several sources; 46 (20%) use 9-1-1. 4) Personnel—two systems (0.85%) exclusively employ paramedic; 141 systems (60%) have at least one emergency medical technician; the remainder use emergency care attendants and first-aid providers; 118 (50%) have medical directors, of these 76 (64 %) are student health physicians and 21 (18%) are community physicians. 5) Demographic Information—The majority of the campus-based EMS systems exist on small campuses in urban areas.

A significant number of colleges/universities have EMS systems and one-half transport patients. However, the level of training of the personnel and medical direction may be below the standard for the EMS systems in the communities in which these campus-based systems exist.

Significant differences exist in the outcome of patients with altered level of consciousness (ALOC) cared for by advanced life support (ALS) compared with basic life support (BLS) prehospital providers.

Patients transported by ambulance to a community teaching hospital during an 11-month period were studied retrospectively. Study patients were those considered not alert by prehospital personnel. Exclusion criteria included: trauma, intoxication, drowning, shock, and cardiac arrest. Data were abstracted from the ambulance reports and hospital records.

Two hundred three patients with an ALOC were identified; 113 were transported by ALS providers (56%) and 90 (44%) by BLS providers. Prehospital levels of consciousness, according to the “alert, verbal, painful, unresponsive” scale (ALS vs BLS) were: “verbal” (40% vs 51%), “painful” (23% vs 23%), and “unresponsive” (37% vs 25%). The mean value for scene time was 15±6 minutes for ALS versus 10±4 minutes for BLS (p <0.001). On arrival in the emergency department, the LOC of 72 (64 %) ALS patients and 58 (64%) BLS patients had improved to “alert.” The level of consciousness in one ALS patient worsened. Fifty-two ALS (46%) and 38 (42%) BLS patients were admitted. Principal final diagnoses were seizure (27% ALS vs 38% BLS), hypoglycemia (23% ALS vs 23% BLS), and stroke (22% ALS vs 20% BLS). Remaining diagnoses each constituted less than 7% of total discharge diagnoses. No statistically significant differences in measures of outcome were noted between ALS or BLS patients. Diagnoses of seizure, stroke, and hypoglycemia were studied individually. No differences in admission rate, mortality rate, or disposition were identified. Hypoglycemic patients conveyed by ALS provider had significantly shorter emergency department treatment times than did those transported by BLS providers (160±62 minutes ALS vs 229±67 minutes BLS [p <0.005]).

Advanced life support levels of care of patients with an ALOC does not significantly change outcome compared with those receiving BLS care with the exception of shorter emergency department treatment times for hypoglycemic patients.

Blood pressure (BP) in the out-of-hospital setting is one of the most important diagnostic tools used by emergency medical services (EMS) providers. Conventional methods of palpation and auscultation can be time consuming, and the measurements often are inaccurate because of the adverse working conditions encountered. Pulse oximetry waveform systolic blood pressure (POWSBP) measurement has been used successfully in emergency departments to monitor BP. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of field POWSBP measurements obtained by noninvasive electronic BP measurement (NIBPM), auscultation, and palpation in the out-of-hospital environment.

Blood pressure measurements used for this study were obtained by POWSBP, NIBPM (PROPAQ model 102; Protocol Systems, Beaverton, Oregon USA), auscultation, and palpation on patients in moving ambulances. Measurement of POWSBP was accomplished by observing the return of the waveform on the pulse oximeter at the time of cuff deflation. The order in which the readings were obtained as well as the arm chosen for measurement were randomized.

Paramedics and emergency medical technicians in an urban, inner-city emergency medical services (EMS) system.

Bloopressure measurements were sampled from 69 patients. Regression analysis identified significant correlation between POWSBP and the four methods utilized, with r = 0.92 for NIPBM, r = 0.95 for auscultation, and r = 0.97 for palpation, all significant at p<0.0001.

The use of POWSBP measurement is a fast, easy, and accurate technique with which to measure systolic BP in the field. It may have special importance for noisy environments and moving vehicles in which conventional methods of auscultation or palpation may be difficult.

There is conflicting research regarding the extent to which patient care is a source of stress for emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Some research indicates that it is important, whereas other studies suggest that it takes a “back seat” to administrative and organizational problems. This study sought to explore this issue further by investigating the relationship between caring for patients, daily workday stress, and daily nonworkday stress among EMTs.

All EMTs employed by East Baton Rouge Parish Emergency Medical Services were eligible for participation. After the study was described, subjects completed a demographic information sheet and informed consent was obtained. Participants then completed 30 days of monitoring with a standardized measure of daily stress (the Daily Stress Inventory) and a measure of patient-care stress designed for use in this study (Emergency Call Questionnaire).

A very large portion of the variance in the EMTs' overall daily workday stress was associated with patient care (r = 0.677, p <0.001). Additionally, patient care stress on workdays significantly predicted overall daily stress on the following nonworkday (i.e., post-workday) (r = 0.633, p <0.001). Finally, EMTs who had stressful pre-workdays rated their patient care as more stressful on the following workday (r = 0.512, p <0.01).

Results suggest that patient care is a critical factor in daily stress among EMTs, both on workdays and post-workdays, providing preliminary evidence for a carryover effect. Evidence also suggests that stress on the day before work may influence EMTs' perceptions of their patients on workdays.