No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. By Deborah Jordan Brooks . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. 221 pp. $26.95 paper. - More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. By Susan J. Carroll and Kira Sanbonmatsu . New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. 160 pp. $28.95 paper. - Shattered, Cracked or Firmly Intact? Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. By Farida Jalalzai . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 305 pp. $73.00 hardcover. - Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office. By Jennifer L Lawless . New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 279 pp. $29.99 paper. - Contagious Representation: Women's Political Representation in Democracies around the World. By Frank C. Thames and Margaret S. Williams . New York: New York University Press, 2013. 208 pp. $45.00 hardcover.
Review products
He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. By Deborah Jordan Brooks . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. 221 pp. $26.95 paper.
More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. By Susan J. Carroll and Kira Sanbonmatsu . New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. 160 pp. $28.95 paper.
Shattered, Cracked or Firmly Intact? Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. By Farida Jalalzai . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 305 pp. $73.00 hardcover.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Online Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016
References
REFERENCE
Dunaway, Johanna, Lawrence, Regina G., Rose, Melody, and Weber, Christopher R.. 2013. “Traits versus Issues: How Female Candidates Shape Coverage of Senate and Gubernatorial Races.” Political Research Quarterly
66 (3): 715–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar