Skip to main content Accessibility help

Dealing with farmers’ Ethnolinguistic differences when collecting crop diversity on-farm

  • Joseph Ireri Kamau (a1), Vanesse Labeyrie (a2), Grace Njeri Njoroge (a3), Anthony Kibira Wanjoya (a3), Peterson Weru Wambugu (a1), Zachary Kithinji Muthamia (a1) and Christian Leclerc (a2)...


Identification and characterization of the farmers’ named crop varieties cultivated around the world is a major issue for conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources. Intraspecific diversity is strongly determined by farmers’ socio-cultural environment, but this has little been documented. In this paper, we tested, on a contact zone among three ethnolinguistic groups located on the Mount Kenya region, whether farmers’ socio-cultural differences have an impact on the morphological characteristics of the farmers’ named sorghum varieties. Eighteen qualitative morphological traits of the panicles were measured. We first compared the morphological diversity of the named varieties among ethnolinguistic groups using multivariate analysis of homogeneity of groups’ dispersion and tested their differentiation using permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Discriminant analysis of principal components was then used to categorize the morphological diversity without a priori, and this classification was compared with farmers’ local taxonomy (vernacular names) in the three ethnolinguistic groups. Our results show that some morphotypes are peculiar to some ethnolinguistic groups and that a morphotype can bear different variety names while the same variety name can be used to identify different morphotypes. Morphological differentiation that was explained by ethnolinguistic groups was higher for local landraces than for improved varieties. Our findings imply that socio-cultural diversity of farmers and the criteria they use to identify and maintain landraces need to be considered in studying and sampling crop diversity for in situ as well as for ex situ conservation.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Anderson, MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 3246.
Anderson, MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62: 245253.
Anderson, MJ, Ellingsen, KE and McArdle, BH (2006) Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecology Letters 9: 683693.
Barnaud, A, Deu, M, Garine, E, McKey, D and Joly, HI (2007) Local genetic diversity of sorghum in a village in Northern Cameroon: structure and dynamics of landraces. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 237248.
Barth, F (1969) Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Long Grove, Illinois: Little, Brown & Co.
Boster, JS (1986) Exchange of varieties and information between Aguaruna Manioc cultivators. American Anthropologist 88: 428436.
Brush, SB (1995) In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity. Crop Science 35: 346354.
Brush, SB (2000) Genes in the Field: on-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity. Ottawa, Canada: IDRC.
Camberlin, P, Boyard-Michaud, J, Philippon, N, Baron, C, Leclerc, C and Mwongera, C (2014) Climatic gradients along the windward slopes of Mount Kenya and their implication for crop risks. Part 1: climate variability. International Journal of Climatology 34: 21362152. doi: 10.1002/joc.3427
de Wet, JMJ (1978) Systematics and evolution of Sorghum (Gramineae). American Journal of Botany 65: 477484.
Harlan, J and de Wet, JMJ (1972) A simplified classification of cultivated sorghum. Crop Science 12: 172176.
IPGRI (1993) Descriptors for Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Rome, Italy: IBP-GR/ICRISAT.
Jaetzold, R, Schmidt, H, Hornetz, B and Shisanya, C (2007) Farm Management Handbook of Kenya (2nd edition), vol.II, part C East Kenya. Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information. Nairobi: Ministry of Agriculture.
Jombart, T (2008) adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24: 14031405.
Jombart, T, Devillard, S and Balloux, F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genetics 11: 94.
Labeyrie, V, Deu, M, Barnaud, A, Calatayud, C, Buiron, M, Wambugu, P, … Leclerc, C (2014a) Influence of ethnolinguistic diversity on the sorghum genetic patterns in subsistence farming systems in Eastern Kenya. PLoS ONE 9: e92178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092178
Labeyrie, V, Rono, B and Leclerc, C (2014b) How social organization shapes crop diversity: an ecological anthropology approach among Tharaka farmers of Mount Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values 31: 97107.
Leclerc, C and Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge, G (2012) Social organization of crop genetic diversity. The GxExS interaction model. Diversity 4: 132. doi: 10.3390/d401001
Leclerc, C, Mwongera, C, Camberlin, P and Moron, V (2014) Cropping system dynamics, climate variability, and seed losses among East African smallholder farmers: a retrospective survey. Weather, Climate and Society 6: 354370. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00035.1
Lewis, MP, Simons, GF and Fennig, CD (2009) Ethnologue: Languages of the World. (Vol. 9). Dallas, Texas: SIL international.
Middleton, J and Kershaw, G (1965) The Central Tribes of the North-eastern Bantu: The Kikuyu, Including Embu, Meru, Mbere, Chuka, Mwimbi, Tharaka, and the Kamba of Kenya. London: International African Institute.
Mokuwa, A, Nuijten, E, Okry, F, Teeken, B, Maat, H, Richards, P and Struik, PC (2013) Robustness and strategies of adaptation among farmer varieties of African rice (Oryza glaberrima) and Asian rice (Oryza sativa) across West Africa. PloS ONE 8: e34801.
Mokuwa, A, Nuijten, E, Okry, F, Teeken, B, Maat, H, Richards, P and Struik, PC (2014) Processes underpinning development and maintenance of diversity in rice in West Africa: evidence from combining morphological and molecular markers.
Mwongera, C, Boyard-Michaud, J, Baron, C and Leclerc, C (2014) Social process of adaptation to environmental changes: how Eastern African societies intervene between crops and climate. Weather, Climate and Society 6: 341353. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00034.1
Nuijten, E and Almekinders, CJ (2008) Mechanisms explaining variety naming by farmers and name consistency of rice varieties in the Gambia. Economic Botany 62: 148160.
Oksanen, J, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, O'Hara, B, Stevens, MHH, Oksanen, MJ and Suggests, M (2015) The vegan package. Community Ecology Package version 2.3-0.
Perales, HR, Benz, BF and Brush, SB (2005) Maize diversity and ethnolinguistic diversity in Chiapas, Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 949954.
Pressoir, G and Berthaud, J (2004) Population structure and strong divergent selection shape phenotypic diversification in maize landraces. Heredity 92: 95101.
Quiros, C, Brush, SB, Douches, DS, Zimmerer, KS and Huestis, G (1990) Biochemical and folk assessment of variability of Andean cultivated potatoes. Economic Botany 44: 254266.
Rabbi, IY, Geiger, HH, Haussmann, BI, Kiambi, D, Folkertsma, R and Parzies, HK (2010) Impact of farmers’ practices and seed systems on the genetic structure of common sorghum varieties in Kenya and Sudan. Plant Genetic Resources 8: 116126.
Smale, M and Jayne, TS (2003) Maize in Eastern and Southern Africa: “seeds” of success in retrospect. EPTD Discussion 97: 187.
Smale, M, Byerlee, D and Jayne, T (2011) Maize Revolutions in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 5659: 1–32.
Team, RC (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2012. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
Xie, Y (2013) knitr: a general-purpose package for dynamic report generation in R. R Package Version 1: 111.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Kamau supplementary material S1
Kamau supplementary material

 Unknown (78 KB)
78 KB
Supplementary materials

Kamau supplementary material S2
Kamau supplementary material

 Unknown (127 KB)
127 KB
Supplementary materials

Kamau supplementary material S3
Kamau supplementary material

 Unknown (71 KB)
71 KB
Supplementary materials

Kamau supplementary material S4
Kamau supplementary material

 Unknown (70 KB)
70 KB
Supplementary materials

Kamau supplementary material S5
Kamau supplementary material

 Unknown (86 KB)
86 KB
Supplementary materials

Kamau supplementary material S6
Kamau supplementary material

 Unknown (95 KB)
95 KB
Supplementary materials

Kamau supplementary material S7
Kamau supplementary material

 Word (545 KB)
545 KB

Dealing with farmers’ Ethnolinguistic differences when collecting crop diversity on-farm

  • Joseph Ireri Kamau (a1), Vanesse Labeyrie (a2), Grace Njeri Njoroge (a3), Anthony Kibira Wanjoya (a3), Peterson Weru Wambugu (a1), Zachary Kithinji Muthamia (a1) and Christian Leclerc (a2)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed