Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:15:21.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time Travel and the Paranormal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Antony Flew
Antony Flew
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 63 , Issue 244 , April 1988 , pp. 266 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Philosophy 62 (1987), 227–236.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. 227.

3 Ibid. 227.

4 Ibid. 227.

5 Ibid. 228. But Sorensen is in error when on the previous page he presents the argument attacked as: ‘if there are miracles, then God exists; there are miracles, so God exists’. For what Hume is primarily concerned to refute is: not any argument of a natural theology; but the contention that the claims of a candidate revelation can be authenticated by the occurrence of endorsing miracles. See, for instance, my Hume's Philosophy of Belief (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961), 166–213.Google Scholar

6 Sorensen, , op. cit. 230.Google Scholar

7 For explanations of these terms see Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Parapsychology, Flew, Antony (ed.) (Buffalo, New York: Prometheus, 1987).Google Scholar

8 See, for instance, ‘The Presuppositions of Survival’, Philosophy 62 (1987) 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar