Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:18:39.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domination and Disobedience: Protest, Coercion and the Limits of an Appeal to Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2018

Guy Aitchison Open the ORCID record for Guy Aitchison [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I offer a conceptual framework for assessing the normative legitimacy of coercive disobedience—involving threats, disruption, force, and deceit—by social movements. A standard liberal view is that while coercion may be required to resist authoritarian regimes, it is illegitimate in a democratic state since it conflicts with majority rule and mutual respect. In restricting disobedience to a form of moral persuasion, this perspective neglects how social power and material interests can distort the conditions for open, fair deliberation. I offer a principled defense of coercive disobedience, not only in repressive states but in plausibly democratic societies. I argue that coercion can be justified on democratic republican grounds as a means to collectively contest objectionable forms of political domination. The use of coercion can be justified as a surrogate tool of political action for those who lack effective participation rights; as a remedial tool to counteract the dominating influence of powerful actors over the process of democratic will formation, and as a mobilizational tool to maintain participation and discipline in collective action. I conclude by proposing democratic constraints on the use of coercive tactics designed to offset the potential movements themselves become a source of arbitrary power.

Type
Special Section: The Persistence of Authoritarianism
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 666 - 679
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

He thanks Associate Editor Daniel I. O’Neill and four anonymous reviewers for Perspectives on Politics for their excellent feedback and assistance in improving the paper. Earlier drafts were presented at conferences at Sciences Po, Paris; the European University Institute, Florence; and the LSE. He would like to thank audiences there for their valuable comments. Special thanks are also due to Rob Jubb, Laura Valentini, Candice Delmas, Richard Bellamy, Temi Ogunye, Simon Stevens, Adam Tebble, Martin Sticker, Steven Klein, John Wilesmith, Bruno Leipold, Christine Hobden, Rutger Birnie, Anthony Barnett, Rainer Bauböck, Avia Pasternak and Bilyana Petkova. He would also like to acknowledge the generous financial support of the Irish Research Council.

References

Aitchison, Guy. 2017. “Three Models of Republican Rights: Juridical, Parliamentary and Populist.” Political Studies 65(2): 339–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109(2): 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Scott A. 2010. “The Enforcement Approach to Coercion.” Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 5(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 2002 [1969]. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Kimberley. 2012. Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, Luis. 2010. The Practice of Global Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celikates, Robin. 2016a. “Rethinking Civil Disobedience as a Practice of Contestation—Beyond the Liberal Paradigm.” Constellations 23(1): 37–45.Google Scholar
Celikates, Robin. 2016b. “Democratizing Civil Disobedience.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 42(10): 982–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, Alan M. S. J. 2015. “Two Spheres of Domination: Republican Theory, Social Norms and the Insufficiency of Negative Freedom.” Contemporary Political Theory 14(1): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Delmas, Candice. 2014. “Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness.” Law and Philosophy 33(4): 465–88.Google Scholar
Gilbert, David. 2012. Love and Struggle: My Life in SDS, the Weather Underground, and Beyond. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–81.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, Jasper, James M., and Polletta, Francesca, eds. 2009. Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex. 2016. “Quitting Work but Not the Job: Liberty and the Right to Strike.” Perspectives on Politics 14(2): 307–23.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985 “Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30: 95–116.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Mathew and Stears, Marc. 2006. “Animal Rights Protest and the Challenge to Deliberative Democracy.” Economy and Society 35(3): 400–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, David. 2007. “On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience.” Ethics 117(2): 202–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, Alexander. 2017. “Between Means and Ends: Reconstructing Coercion in Dewey’s Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 111(3): 522–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, et al. 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. 2012. “Another Realism: The Politics of Gandhian Nonviolence.” American Political Science Review 106(2): 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Daniel. 2004. “Democratic Disobedience.” Yale Law Journal. Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper No.114.Google Scholar
Medearis, John. 2015. Why Democracy Is Oppositional. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1969. “Coercion.” In Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel, ed. Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick, and White, Morton. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 2009. The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard Economic Studies 124. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pasternak, Avia and McTernan, Emily “Political Rioting: A Moral Assessment.” Challenging Injustice: the Ethics and Modalities of Political Engagement, E.U.I., Florence, 15 February 2016.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979. “Civil Disobedience.” In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1973. Democracy and Disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, William. 2013. Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2004. “Terrorism and the Uses of Terror.” Journal of Ethics 8(1): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1970. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War and Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2006. “Democracy and Deceit: Regulating Appearances of Corruption.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 165–66.Google Scholar
Wasow, Omar. 2017. “Do Protest Tactics Matter? Evidence from the 1960’s Black Insurgency.” Working paper, Princeton University. Available at http://www.omarwasow.com/Protests_on_Voting.pdf, accessed March 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Watkins, David. 2015. “Institutionalizing Freedom as Non-domination: Democracy and the Role of the State.” Polity 47(4): 508–34.Google Scholar
Welchman, Jennifer. 2001. “Is Ecosabotage Civil Disobedience?” Philosophy & Geography 4(1): 97–107.Google Scholar
Wilks, Stephen. 2013. The Political Power of the Business Corporation. Cheltlenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Julia Carrie. 2016. “Dakota Access Pipeline: US Denies Key Permit, a Win for Standing Rock Protesters.” The Guardian; available at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/04/dakota-access-pipeline-permit-denied-standing-rock; accessed December 19, 2017.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29(5): 670–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Kevin and Schwartz, Michael. 2014. “A Neglected Mechanism of Social Movement Political Influence: The Role of Anti-corporate and Anti-Institutional Protest in Changing Government Policy.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 19(3): 239–60.Google Scholar