Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T02:58:30.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional versus local helminth parasite richness in British freshwater fish: saturated or unsaturated parasite communities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. R. Kennedy  and
J.-F. Guégan
C. R. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, Exeter University, Exeter EX4 4PS
J.-F. Guégan
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, Exeter University, Exeter EX4 4PS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The relationships between regional species richness and local species richness were examined in respect of helminth parasite communities in 32 species of freshwater fish in the British Isles. Fish were divided into 5 categories, for each of which the goodness of fit of the relationship to linear, exponential and power function models was tested. For all categories of fish combined, there was a significant, positive curvilinear relationship. Nested within this were two other patterns. For introduced fish, a linear model provided the best fit; for euryhaline and relict species it was impossible to determine the best model, but for the other categories the relationship was curvilinear and was best fitted by a power function model. The linear relationship found for introduced fish was interpreted as a temporary situation, reflecting the shortage of time for the communities to become saturated. It corresponded to the linear part of the curvilinear relationship of the other categories, which is believed to represent the fundamental form of the relationship for parasite communities. The communities reached a saturation level of richness, corresponding to the asymptote of the curve, which fell well below regional species richness. Explanations for local saturation are discussed, but neither community structure nor supply-side ecology can yet be preferred. It is concluded that local patterns in helminth community richness, in contrast to those in fish assemblages, are not significantly influenced by patterns on a larger, regional spatial scale and so regional species richness is not a key determinant of local species richness, nor does a knowledge of regional patterns improve predictability of local patterns.

Keywords

helminthcommunityspecies richnesssaturationpredictability
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 109 , Issue 2 , August 1994 , pp. 175 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aho, J. M. (1990). Helminth communities of amphibians and reptiles: comparative approaches to understanding patterns and processes. In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (ed. Esch, G., Bush, A. & Aho, J.), pp. 157–195. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, R. M. & Kennedy, C. R. (1990). Interactions between the acanthocephalans Pomphorhynchus laevis and Acanthocephalus anguillae in rainbow trout: testing an exclusion hypothesis. Parasitology 100, 435–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bush, A. O. (1990). Helminth communities in avian hosts: determinants of pattern. In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (ed. Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J.), pp. 197–232. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, E. F. & McCoy, E. D. (1979). The statistics and biology of the species–area relationship. American Naturalist 113, 791–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagnélie;, P. (1988). Théorie et Méthodes Statistiques. Gembloux: Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, A.S.B.L.Google Scholar
Dayton, P. K., Tegner, M. J., Parnell, P. E. & Edwards, P. B. (1992). Temporal and spatial patterns of disturbance and recovery in a kelp forest community. Ecological Monographs 62, 421–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M. (1990). Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Esch, G. W., Kennedy, C. R., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M. (1988). Patterns in helminth communities in freshwater fish in Great Britain: alternative strategies for colonization. Parasitology 96, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, A. J., Doherty, P. J. & Williams, D. McB. (1992). Multi-scale analysis of recruitment of a coral reef fish on the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series 82, 131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. D. (1990). Parasites and host geographic range as illustrated by waterfowl. Functional Ecology 4, 645–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guégan, J.-F. & Kennedy, C. R. (1993). Maximum local helminth parasite community richness in British freshwater fish: a test of the colonization time hypothesis. Parasitology 106, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. C. (1986). Parasites and parasitologists: confrontation and co-operation. Bulletin of the Canadian Society of Zoology 17, 6–8.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1974). A checklist of British and Irish freshwater fish parasites with notes on their distribution. Journal of Fish Biology 6, 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1975). The natural history of Slapton Ley Nature Reserve. VIII. The parasites of fish, with special reference to their use as a source of information about the aquatic community. Field Studies 4, 177–89.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1978). An analysis of the metazoan parasitocoenoses of brown trout Salmo trutta from British lakes. Journal of Fish Biology 13, 255–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1990). Helminth communities in freshwater fish: structured communities or stochastic assemblages? In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (ed. Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M.), pp. 131–156. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1992). Field evidence for interactions between the acanthocephalans Acanthocephalus anguillae and A. lucii in eels, Anguilla anguilla. Ecological Parasitology 1, 122–34.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1993 a). Introductions, spread and colonization of new localities by fish helminth and crustacean parasites in the British Isles: a perspective and appraisal. Journal of Fish Biology 43, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1993 b). The dynamics of intestinal helminth communities in eels Anguilla anguilla in a small stream: long-term changes in richness and structure. Parasitology 107, 71–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. & Bush, A. O. (1994). The relationship between pattern and scale in parasite communities: a stranger in a strange land. Parasitology 109, 187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M. (1986 a). Patterns in helminth communities: why are birds and fish different? Parasitology 93, 205–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, C. R., Hartvigsen, R. & Halvorsen, O. (1991). The importance of fish stocking in the dissemination of parasites throughout a group of reservoirs. Journal of Fish Biology 38, 541–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., Laffoley, D. D'A., Bishop, G., Jones, P. & Taylor, M. (1986 b). Communities of parasites of freshwater fish of Jersey, Channel Islands. Journal of Fish Biology 29, 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73, 1943–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neraasen, T. G. & Holmes, J. C. (1975). The circulation of cestodes among three species of geese nesting on the Anderson River Delta, Canada. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 23, 277–89.Google Scholar
Price, P. W. (1980). Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Price, P. W. & Clancy, K. M. (1983). Patterns in number of helminth parasite species in freshwater fishes. Journal of Parasitology 69, 449–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (1987). Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science (Washington) 235, 167–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothman, L. D. & Darling, D. C. (1991). Spatial density dependence: effects of scale, host spatial pattern and parasitoid reproductive strategy. Oikos 62, 221–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sale, P. F. & Guy, J. A. (1992). Persistence of community structure: what happens when you change taxonomic scale? Coral Reefs 11, 147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry. San Francisco: Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Tonn, W. M. (1990). Climate change and fish communities: a conceptual framework. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119, 337–52.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar