Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T11:45:06.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the infracommunity structure of adult cestodes in freshwater fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. I. Andersen  and
E. T. Valtonen
K. I. Andersen
Affiliation:
Zoological Museum, University of Oslo, Norway
E. T. Valtonen
Affiliation:
University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biology, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The distribution–co-occurrence and exchange of adult cestode species in two fish communities (the Bothnian Bay and Lake Yli-Kitka both in Finland) was studied. Coexistence of two or more mature cestode species in the same fish host population was zero for all fish species studied (33) except pike in the Bothnian Bay and whitefish in the lake. It was found that 60% of the fish species studied in the Bothnian Bay and 80% of the fish species studied from Lake Yli-Kitka harboured only 1 mature cestode species. Exchange of adult cestode species between the different fish species in these two fish communities was found to be as rare as coexistence. The infra-community structure of adult cestodes in freshwater fish thus turned out to be markedly different from what is known to be the situation in birds. The evolutionary explanation behind the differences is discussed.

Keywords

cestodesinfracommunity structureexchangecoexistence
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 101 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 257 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alasaarela, E. (1979). Phytoplankton and environmental conditions in central and coastal areas of the Bothnian Bay. Annales Botanica Fennici 16, 241–74.Google Scholar
Andersen, K. I. (1979). Variation in scolex morphology within and between some species of the genus Proteocephalus Weinland (Cestoda: Proteocephala) with to strobilar morphology. Zoologica Scripta 8, 241–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, K. & Kennedy, C. R. (1983). The systematics of the genus Eubothrium Nybelin, 1927 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea): with a partial re-description of the different species. Zoologica Scripta 12, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasson, S. & Petersson, B. (1982). The fish fauna of the Gulf of Bothnia. In Coastal Research in the Gulf of Bothnia: Monographiae Biologicae, vol. 45 (ed. Müller, K.), pp. 301–315. The Hague, Boston and London: Dr W. Junk Publishers.Google Scholar
Avery, R. A. (1969). The ecology of tapeworm parasites in wild fowl. Wildfozd Trust England 20, 59–69.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. E. & Margolis, L. (1987). Comparison of parasite fauna of juvenile sockey salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) from southern British Columbian and Washington State lakes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65, 420–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakke, T. A. (1985). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway. XL. The Common Gull Larus canus L. as final host for Cestoda (Platyhelminthes). Fauna Norvegica Series A6, 42–54.Google Scholar
Borgström, R. & Halvorsen, O. (1968). Studies of the Helminth Fauna of Norway XL Caryophyllaeides fennica (Schneider) (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea) in Lake Bogstad. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 16, 20–3.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. R. (1980). Allopatric speciation and non-interactive parasite community structure. Systematic Zoology 30, 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. O. & Holmes, J. C. (1986). Intestinal helminths of lesser scaup ducks: an interactive community. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 142–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connely, J. J. & McCarthy, T. K. (1984). The metazoan parasites of freshwater fishes in the Corrib catchment area, Ireland. Journal of Fish Biology 24, 363–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czaplinski, B. (1975). Hymenolepididae parasitizing wild mute swans Cygnus olor (Gm) of different age in Poland. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 23, 305–27.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. P. (1985). The population dynamics of competition between parasites. Parasitology 66, 371–2.Google Scholar
Dogiel, V. A., Petrushevski, G. K. & Polyanski, Y. L. (1961). Parasitology of Fishes. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, O. (1971). Studies on the helminth fauna of Norway. XVIII. On the composition of the parasite fauna of coarse fish in the River Gloma, south-eastern Norway. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 19, 181–92.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, O. & Kurimo, H. (1977). The postglacial history of Kitkajärvi, North-eastern Finland, as indicated by trend-surface analysis and radio-carbon dating. Fennia 153, 1–32.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. (1973). Site selection by parasitic helminths: interspecific interactions, site segregation, and their importance to the development of helminth communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 51, 333–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. C. (1979). Parasite populations and host community structure. In Host–Parasite Interfaces (ed. Nickol, B. B.). New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hyytinen, L. (1985). [Fishery research in the lake complex Kitkajärvi during the years 1981–1983. A review of the present stage]. Oulanka Biological Station Reports, No. 8 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1981). Parasitocoenoses dynamics in freshwater ecosystems in Britain. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademia Nauk, USSR 108, 9–22.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M. (1986). Patterns in helminth communities: why are birds and fish different? Parasitology 93, 205–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotecki, N. R. (1970). Circulation of the cestode fauna of Anseriformes in the Municipal Zoological Garden in Warsawa. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 17, 329–55.Google Scholar
Kuperman, B. I. (1973). Tapeworms of the Genus Triaenophorus Parasites of Fishes. Nauka Publishers Leningrad Section, Leningrad (English translation 1981 Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi).Google Scholar
Leong, T. S. & Holmes, J. C. (1981). Communities of metazoan parasites in open water fishes of Cold Lake, Alberta. Journal of Fish Biology 18, 693–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, L. & Borgstrom, R. (1973). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway. XXXI: Distribution and seasonal occurrence of Proteocephalus sp. Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephala) in brown trout, Salmo trutta L. from southern Norway. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 21, 293–7.Google Scholar
Margolis, L. & Arthur, J. R. (1979). Synopsis of the parasites of the fishes of Canada. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 199, 1–269.Google Scholar
Michajlow, W. (1962). Species of the genus Triaenophorus (Cestoda) and their hosts in various geographical regions. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 10, 1–36.Google Scholar
Miller, R. B. (1952). A review of the Triaenophorus problem in Canadian lakes. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 95, 1–42.Google Scholar
Neraasen, T. G. & Holmes, J. C. (1975). The circulation of cestodes among three species of geese nesting on the Anderson River Delta, Canada. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 23, 277–89.Google Scholar
Persson, L. (1983). Food consumption and competition between age classes in a perch Perca fluviatilis population in a shallow eutrophic lake. Oikos 40, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W. (1980). Evolutionary biology of parasites. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Price, P. W. & Clancy, K. M. (1983). Patterns in number of helminth parasite species in freshwater fishes. Journal of Parasitology 69, 449–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, F., Renaud, F., Mathieu, E. & Gabrion, C. (1988). Importance of the paratenic host in the biology of Bothriocephalus gregarius (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea), a parasite of the turbot. International Journal for Parasitology 18, 611–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohde, K. (1979). A critical evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic factors responsible of niche restriction in parasites. American Naturalist 114, 648–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuring, L. (1930). Beobachtung zur Biologi des Genus Triaenophorus und Betrachtung über das jahreszeitliche Auftreten von Bandwürmern. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 2, 157–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. S. (1987). Helminth parasites of the alimentary tract of the hakes (Merluccius, Urophycis, Phycis: Teleostei) of the Scotian Shelf. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65, 304–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, T. M. & Holmes, J. C. (1987). Host specificity and exchange of intestinal helminths among four species of grebes (Podicipedidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 65, 669–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valtonen, E. T. (1983). Relationships between Corynosome semerme and C. strumosum (Acanthocephala) and their paratenic fish hosts in the Bothnian Bay, Baltic Sea. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis A. No. 155 Biology 21, 1–32.Google Scholar
Valtonen, E. T. & Crompton, D. W. T. (1990). Acanthocephala in fish from the Bothnian Bay, Finland. Journal of Zoology 220, 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valtonen, E. T., Rintamäki, P. & Lappalainen, M. (1989). Triaenophorus nodulosus and T. crassus in fish from Northern Finland. Folia Parasitologica 36, 351–70.Google Scholar
Wisniewski, W. L., Szymanik, K. & Bazanska, K. (1958). The formation of a structure in tapeworm populations. Ceskoslovenska Parazitologie 5, 195–212.Google Scholar
Wootten, R. (1973). The metazoan parasite-fauna of fish from Hanningfield Reservoir, Essex, in relation to features of habitat and host populations. Journal of Zoology 171, 323–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar