Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:08:21.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological characteristics of Echinococcus granulosus derived from buffalo in Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

SEYED HOSSEIN HOSSEINI ,
ARASH AMIN POUR  and
PARVIZ SHAYAN
SEYED HOSSEIN HOSSEINI*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
ARASH AMIN POUR
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
PARVIZ SHAYAN
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: hhoseini@ut.ac.ir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Cystic echinococcosis is a significant parasitic disease in Iran, where a variety of animals act as intermediate hosts. In this study, 25 isolates of Echinococcus granulosus obtained from water buffalo from various parts of Iran were characterized on the basis of the morphology of the metacestode and the adult worm. The characteristics of protoscoleces from the different studied areas were nearly similar. They showed 2 rows of alternating large and small hooks and their shapes were smooth in outline. In contrast to the protoscoleces, the adult rostellar hooks showed a rough outline. The results showed that the total length, the blade lengths of the large and small hooks and the number of hooks are almost similar to those isolated from sheep but significantly different from those isolated from camels. The growth rates of adult E. granulosus (total worm length, segmentation and maturation) of buffalo origin, at 35 and 41 days post-infection of dogs, were nearly comparable to the common sheep strain. The form of the strobila and the morphology of the reproductive system were also similar to those of sheep origin. This suggests that the common sheep strain (G1) of E. granulosus may also use buffaloes as its intermediate host.

Keywords

Echinococcus granulosusbuffalomorphologygenotypestrainIran
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 139 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 103 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmadi, N. (2004). Using morphometery of the larval rostellar hook to distinguish Iranian strains of Echinococcus granulosus. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 98, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadi, N. and Dalimi, A. (2006). Characterization of Echinococcus granulosus isolates from human, sheep and camel in Iran. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 6, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almeida, F. B., Silva, J. R. M., Neves, R. H., Romanii, E. L. S. and Sliva, R. M. (2007). Intraspecific variation of Echinococcus granulosus in livestock from Peru. Veterinary Parasitology 143, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amin Pour, A., Hosseini, S. H. and Shayan, P. (2011 a). Comparative genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus infecting buffalo in Iran using Cox1 gene. Parasitology Research 108, 1229–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin Pour, A., Hosseini, S. H. and Shayan, P. (2011 b). The prevalence and fertility of hydatid cysts in buffaloes from Iran. Journal of Helminthology (in the Press).Google Scholar
Constantine, C. C., Thompson, R. C. A., Jenkins, D. J., Hobbs, R. P. and Lymbery, A. J. (1993). Morphological characterization of adult Echinococcus granulosus as a means of determining transmission patterns. Journal of Parasitology 79, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckert, J., Thompson, R. C. A., Michael, S. A., Kumaratilake, L. M. and El-Sawah, H. M. (1989). Echinococcus granulosus of camel origin: development in dogs and parasite morphology. Parasitology Research 75, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckert, J., Thompson, R. C. A., Micheal, S. A., Lymbery, A. J., Paulowski, Z. C., Gottstin, B. and Morgan, U. M. (1993). Further evidence of a distinct strain of Echinococcus granulosus in European pigs. Parasitology Research 79, 42–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Euzeby, J. (1991). The epidemiology of hydatidosis with special reference to the mediterrean area. Parasitology 33, 25–39.Google Scholar
Fasihi Harandi, M., Hobbs, R. P., Adams, P. J., Mobedi, I., Morgan-Ryan, U. M. and Thompson, R. C. A. (2002). Molecular and morphological characterization of Echinococcus granulosus of human and animal origin in Iran. Parasitology 125, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholami, S., Irshadullah, M. and Mobedi, I. (2011). Rostellar hook morphology of larval Echinococcus granulosus isolates from the Indian buffalo and Iranian sheep, cattle and camel. Journal of Helminthology 85, 239–245.Google Scholar
Gill, H. S. and Rao, B. V. (1967). On the biology and morphology of Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch, 1786) of buffalo-dog origin. Parasitology 57, 695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, R. P., Lymbery, A. J. and Thompson, R. C. A. (1990). Rostellar hook morphology of Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch, 1786) from natural and experimental Australian hosts and its implications for strain recognition. Parasitology 101, 273–281.Google Scholar
Hosseini, S. H. and Eslami, A. (1998). Morphological and developmental characteristics of Echinococcus granulosus derived from sheep, cattle and camels in Iran. Journal of Helminthology 72, 337–341.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. J., Roming, T. and Thompson, R. C. A. (2005). Emergence/re-emergence of Echinococcus spp.: a global update. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 1205–1219.Google Scholar
Kumaratilake, L. M. and Thompson, R. C. A. (1984). Morphological characterization of Australian strains of Echinococcus granulosus. International Journal of Parasitology 14, 467–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumaratilake, L. M., Thompson, R. C. A. and Eckert, J. (1986). Echinococcus granulosus of equine origin from different countries possess uniform morphological characteristics. International Journal for Parasitology 16, 529–540.Google Scholar
Latif, A. A., Tanveer, A., Magbool, A., Siddiqi, N., KyawTanner, M. and Traub, R. J. (2010). Morphological and molecular characterization on Echinococcus granulosus in livestock and humans in Punjab, Pakistan. Veterinary Parasitology 170, 44–49.Google Scholar
Lymbery, A. J. (1998). Combining data from morphological traits and genetic markers to determine transmission cycles in the tapeworm, Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology 117, 185–192.Google Scholar
Mariaux, J. (1996). Cestode systematics: any progress? International Journal for Parasitology 26, 231–243.Google Scholar
Mwambete, D. K., Ponce-Gordo, F. and Cuesta-Bandera, C. (2004). Genetic identification and host range of Spanish strains of Echinococcus granulosus. Acta Tropica 91, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedenkar, P., Gatne, M. L., Thompson, R. C. A. and Trub, R. J. T. (2009). Molecular and morphological characteristics of Echinococcus from food producting animals in India. Veterinary Parasitology 165, 58–65.Google Scholar
Ponce Gordo, F. and Cuesta Bandera, C. (1997). Differentiation of Spanish strains of Echinococcus granulosus using larval rostellar hook morphometry. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 41–49.Google Scholar
Rokni, M. B. (2009). Echinococcosis /hydatidosis in Iran. Iranian Journal of Parasitology 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Rostami Nejad, M., Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, E., Nochi, Z., Fasihi Harandi, M., Cheraghipour, K., Mowlavi, G. R. and Zali, M. R. (2008). Echinococcus granulosus strain differentiation in Iran based on sequence heterogeneity in the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. Journal of Helminthology 82, 343–347.Google Scholar
Said, I. M., Abdel-Hafez, S. K. and Al-Yaman, F. M. (1988). Morphological variation of Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces from hydatid cysts of human and various domestic animals in Jordan. International Journal for Parasitology 18, 1111–1114.Google Scholar
Sharbatkhori, M., Mirhendi, H., Fasihi Harandi, M., Rezaeian, M., Mohebali, M., Eshraghian, M., Rahimi, M. and Beigom Kia, E. (2010). Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in livestock of Iran indicating high frequency of G1 genotype in camels. Experimental Parasitology 124, 373–379.Google Scholar
Simsek, S. and Eroksuz, Y. (2008). Occurrence, molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus in Turkish mouflon (Ovis gmelinii anatolica). Acta Tropica 109, 167–169.Google Scholar
Šnábel, V., Altintas, N. D., Amelio, S., Nakao, M., Romig, T., Yolasigmaz, A., Gunes, K., Turk, M., Busi, M., Hüttner, M., Ševcová, D., Ito, A., Altintas, N. and Dubinský, P. (2009). Cystic echinococcosis in Turkey: genetic variability and first record of the pig strain (G7) in the country. Parasitology Research 105, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweatman, G. K. and Williams, R. J. (1963). Comparative studies on the biology and morphology of Echinococcus granulosus from domestic livestock, moose and reindeer. Parasitology 53, 339–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tashani, O. A., Zhang, L. H., Boufana, B., Jegi, A. and McManus, D. P. (2002). Epidemiology and strain characteristics of Echinococcus granulosus in the Benghazi area of eastern Libya. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 96, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R. C. A. (1995). Biology and systematics of Echinococcus. In Echinococcus and Hydatid Disease (ed. Thompson, R. C. A. and Lymbery, A. J.), pp. 1–50. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. C. A. (2008). The taxonomy, phylogeny and transmission of Echinococcus. Experimental Parasitology 119, 439–446.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. C. A., Boxell, A. C., Ralston, B. J., Constantine, C. C., Hobbs, R. P., Shury, T. and Olson, M. E. (2006). Molecular and morphological characterization of Echinococcus in cervids from North America. Parasitology 132, 439–447.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. C. A. and Kumaratilake, L. M. (1985). Comparative development of Australian strains of Echinococcus granulosus in dingoes (Canis familiaris dingo) and domestic dogs (C. f. familiaris), with further evidence for the origin of the Australian sylvatic strain. International Journal for Parasitology 15, 535–542.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. C. A., Kumaratilake, L. M. and Eckert, J. (1984). Observations on Echinococcus granulosus of cattle origin in Switzerland. International Journal for Parasitology 14, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R. C. A. and Lymbery, A. J. (1988). The nature and significance of variation within in the genus Echinococcus. Advance in Parasitology 27, 210–248.Google ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R. C. A., Lymbery, A. J. and Constantine, C. C. (1995). Variation in Echinococcus: towards a taxonomic revision of the genus. Advances in Parasitology 35, 146–176.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. and McManus, D. (2002). Towards a taxonomic revision of the genus Echinococcus. Trends in Parasitology 18, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utuk, A. E., Simsek, S., Koroglub, E. and McManus, D. P. (2008). Molecular genetic characterization of different isolates of Echinococcus granulosus in east and southeast regions of Turkey. Acta Tropica 107, 192–194.Google Scholar
Vural, G., Baca, A. U., Gauci, C. G., Bagci, O., Gicik, Y. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2008). Variability in the Echinococcus granulosus Cytochrome C oxidase 1 mitochondrial gene sequence from livestock in Turkey and a re-appraisal of the G1–3 genotype cluster. Veterinary Parasitology 154, 347–350.Google Scholar
Worbes, H., Thompson, R. C. A. and Eckert, J. (1989). Occurrence of the cattle strain of Echinococcus granulosus in the German Democratic Republic. Parasitology Research 75, 495–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L., Eslami, A., Hosseini, S. H. and McManus, D. P. (1998). Indication of the presence of tow distinct strains of Echinococcus granulosus in Iran by mitochondrial DNA markers. American journals of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 59, 171–175.Google Scholar