Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:10:50.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frequency distributions of parasites in a population of three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., with particular reference to the negative binomial distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Linda Pennycuick
Linda Pennycuick
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All three species of parasites found in sticklebacks from Priddy had overdispersed distributions, similar in shape to host–parasite distributions described by other authors.

The distributions of both Echinorhynchus clavula and Diplostomum gasterostei were fitted closely by the negative binomial. The values of k were similar for both species, being always less than unity; the Diplostomum distributions were more overdispersed and therefore had higher values of p.

The Schistocephalus distributions were mostly described by the log normal, but the high percentage infection and relatively low overdispersion meant that the fit was often not close. There was also some truncation at the upper end.

The relationship between the parameters of the negative binomial (p and k) and the shape and parameters of the original distribution have been investigated, both theoretically and with respect to the distributions of the stickleback parasites.In general p varied as the overdispersion and k as the percentage infection.

The advantages of an overdispersed distribution to the host and parasite populations are discussed and related to the life cycles of the parasites.

I am most grateful to Dr H. D. Crofton for his help and encouragement during this study, and to the staff of the Computer Unit, University of Bristol for their assistance with programming problems. This work was supported by a Science Research Council research studentship and a NATO studentship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , December 1971 , pp. 389 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, O. N. (1958). Relationships between host fishes and their parasites. In Parasitology of Fishes. Ed. Dogiel, V. A., Petrushevski, G. K. and Polyanski, Yu.I.Leningrad University Press. (English translation by Kabata, Z., 1961. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.)Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I. & Fisher, R. A. (1953). Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics 9, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brass, W. (1958). Simplified methods of fitting the truncated negative binomial distribution. Biometrika 45, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassie, R. M. (1962). Frequency distribution models in the ecology of plankton and other organisms. Journal of Animal Ecology 31, 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1971). A quantitative approach to parasitism. Parasitology 62, 179–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1941). The negative binomial distribution. Annals of Eugenics 11, 182–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, H. B. N. & Nicholas, W. L. (1963). The importance of the acanthocephalan Polymorphus minutus as a parasite of domestic ducks in the United Kingdom. Journal of Helminthology 37, 185–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, B. L. and Llewellyn, L. C. (1967). A quantitative analysis of helminth infestation in some passerine birds found dead on the Island of Skomer. Journal of Helminthology 41, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, B. L. & Srivastava, L. P. (1967). The occurrence of Podocotyle atomon (Rud., 1802) (Digenea), Bothriocephalus scorpii (Müller, 1776) (Cestoda), Contracaecum clavatum (Rud., 1809) (Nematoda) and Echinorhynchus gadi Zoega, in Müller, 1776 (Acanthocephala) in the five-bearded rockling, Onos mustelus (L.). Journal of Natural History 1, 363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. Y. & Hsü, H. F. (1951). On the frequency distribution of parasitic helminths in their naturally infected hosts. Journal of Parasitology 37, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennycuick, L. (1971 a). Quantitative effects of three species of parasites on a population of three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Journal of Zoology, London 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycuick, L. (1971 b). Seasonal variations in the parasite infections in a population of three-spined sticklebacks. Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Parasitology 63, 373–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycuick, L. (1971 c). Differences in the parasite infections in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) of different sex, age and size. Parasitology 63, 407–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srivastava, L. P. & James, B. L. (1967). The morphology and occurrence of Gyrodactylus medius Katharina, 1894 (Monogenoidea) from Onos mustelus (L.). Journal of Natural History 4, 481–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1944). Some applications of the logarithmic series and the index of diversity to ecological problems. Journal of Ecology 32, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1964). Patterns in the Balance of Nature. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar