Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T13:12:29.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. IV. The inability of T-cell-deprived mice to resist re-infection, and other in vivo studies on the mechanisms of resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

M. Doenhoff  and
E. Long
M. Doenhoff
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, 395 Hatfield Road, St Albans AL4 0XQ
E. Long
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, 395 Hatfield Road, St Albans AL4 0XQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

CBA mice deprived of their T-cells by means of thymectomy and administration of rabbit anti-mouse thymocyte serum before a primary infection of Schistosoma mansoni, failed to resist re-infection to the same extent as immunologically intact controls. However, little difference was made to the degree of resistance to re-infection acquired by thymectomized S. mansoni-infected mice when the anti-thymocyte serum was administered after the primary infection and just before the challenge. Hydrocortisone acetate, when administered to primarily infected mice just before reinfection appeared to reduce the degree of acquired resistance, but the drug also had a schistosomicidal effect on the challenge-derived organisms. An attempt to specifically suppress the acquisition of resistance against S. mansoni by administering serum from homologously infected, resistant donors before and during the course of a primary infection failed, and partial depletion of complement activity with cobra venom factor that was administered just before challenge also failed to affect resistance. Serum obtained from mice with chronic S. mansoni infections and injected intradermally at the site of subsequent administration of a homologous percutaneous challenge infection failed to markedly inhibit maturation of the challenge in the recipient. Recipients of 3 ml of serum from heavily infected donors were also not significantly more resistant to challenge than untreated controls. However, isolated skin from heavily infected mice allowed fewer cercariae to penetrate and emerge transformed as schistosomula than did isolated skin from uninfected controls.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 171 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ballow, M. & Cochraine, C. G. (1969). Two anti-complementary factors in cobra venom: haemolysis of guinea pig erythrocytes by one of them. Journal of Immunology 103, 944–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bout, D., Dupas, H., Carlier, Y., Afchain, D. & Capron, A. (1977). Protection of mice against Schistosoma mansoni with BCG. IRCS Medical Science 5, 47.Google Scholar
Butterworth, A. E., David, J. R., Franks, D., Mahmoud, A. A. F., David, P. H., Sturrock, R. F. & Houba, V. (1977). Antibody dependent eosinophil-mediated damage to [51Cr]-labelled schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni damage by purified eosinophils. Journal of Experimental Medicine 145, 136–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capron, A., Dessaint, J. P., Joseph, M., Rousseaux, R. & Bazin, H. (1976). Macrophage cytotoxicity mediated by IgE antibody. In Molecular and Biological Aspects of the Acute Allergic Reaction (ed. Johansson, S. G. O., Strandberge, K. and Uonäs, B.), pp. 153–71. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capron, A. & Lesoin, M. A. (1969). Rôle protecteur du BCG dans la schistosomiase experimentale à S. mansoni. Comptes Rendus 269, 2110–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Clegg, J. A. & Smithers, S. R. (1972). The effects of immune rhesus monkey serum on schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni during cultivation in vitro. International Journal for Parasitology 2, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coker, C. M. (1957). Effect of cortisone on natural immunity to Schistosoma mansoni in mice. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 96, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, A. J. & Szenberg, A. (1968). Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology 14, 599–600.Google ScholarPubMed
Dean, D. A., Wistar, R. & Chen, P. (1975). Immune response of guinea pigs to Schistosoma mansoni. I. In vitro effects of antibody and neutrophils, eosinophils and macrophages on schistosomula. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 24, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, D. A., Wistar, R. & Murrell, K. D. (1974). Combined in vitro effects of rat antibody and neutrophilic leukocytes on schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 23, 420–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doenhoff, M., Bickle, Q., Long, E., Bain, J. & McGregor, A. (1978). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. I. Demonstration of resistance to reinfection using a model system that involves perfusion of mice within three weeks of challenge. Journal of Helminthology 52, 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doenhoff, M. J., Janossy, G. & Kerbel, R. S. (1976). Enumeration of polyclonal mitogen-responsive cells in different lymphoid tissues of the mouse. Immunology 30, 367–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Doenhoff, M. J. & Leuchars, E. (1977). Effects of irradiation, anti-thymocyte serum and corticosteroids on PHA and LPS responsive cells of the mouse. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 53, 505–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fauve, R. M. & Dodin, A. (1976). Influence d'une réaction inflammatoire provoquée par le BCG on par un irritant no biodégradable sur la résistance des souris à la bilharziose. Comptes Rendus 282, 131–4.Google Scholar
Fine, D. P., Buchanan, R. D. & Colley, D. G. (1973). Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice depleted of thymus-dependent lymphocytes. I. Eosinophilia and immunologic responses to a schistosomal egg preparation. American Journal of Pathology 71, 193–206.Google ScholarPubMed
Fitch, F. W (1975). Selective suppression of immune responses: regulation of antibody formation and cell-mediated immunity by antibody. Progress in Allergy 19, 195–244.Google ScholarPubMed
Gysin, J. & Le Corroller, Y. (1976). Effect of inflammatory reaction of the mouse on experimental infection with Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Parasitology 62, 697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillyer, G. V., de Diaz, A. L. & Garciá-Blanco, M. (1975). A new approach to the study of immunity to schistosomes. Boletin de la Asociacion Medica de Puerto Rico 67, 381–5.Google Scholar
James, S. L. & Colley, D. G. (1976). Eosinophil-mediated destruction of Schistosoma mansoni eggs. Journal of the Reticuloendothelial Society 20, 359–74.Google ScholarPubMed
James, E. R. & Taylor, M. G. (1976). Transformation of cercariae to schistosomula: a quantitative comparison of transformation techniques and of infectivity by different injection routes of the organisms produced. Journal of Helminthology 50, 223–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lance, E. M. (1970). The selective action of antilymphocyte serum on recirculating lymphocytes. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 6, 789–802.Google ScholarPubMed
Law, L. W., Bradley, T. R. & Rose, G. (1963). Reversal of the thymus dependent influence in radiation leukemagenesis of C57B1 mice. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 31, 1461.Google Scholar
Levey, R. H. & Medawar, P. B. (1966). Some experiments on the action of antilymphoid antisera. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 129, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, F. von, Sher, A. & McIntyre, S. (1977). A lung model of schistosome immunity in mice. American Journal of Pathology 87, 105–20.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, F. von. (1962). Host response to eggs of S. mansoni. I. Granuloma formation in the unsensitized laboratory mouse. American Journal of Pathology 41, 711–31.Google Scholar
Long, E., Doenhoff, M. & Bain, J. (1978). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. 2. The time at which resistance to reinfection develops. Journal of Helminthology 52, 187–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddison, S. E., Geiger, S. J., Botero, B. & Kagan, I. G. (1970). Schistosoma mansoni infection in the rat. II. Effects of immunosuppression and serum and cell transfer on innate and acquired immunity. Journal of Parasitology 56, 1066–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahmoud, A. A. F., Warren, K. S. & Peters, P. A. (1975). A rôle for the eosinophil in acquired resistance to Schistosoma mansoni infection as determined by anti-eosinophil serum. Journal of Experimental Medicine 142, 805–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, B. M., Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1966). Reagin-like antibodies in experimental infections of Schistosoma mansoni and the passive transfer of resistance. Nature, London 209, 1221–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pepys, M. B. (1975). Studies in vivo of cobra factor and murine C′3. Immunology 28, 369–77.Google Scholar
Phillips, S. M., di Conza, J. J., Gold, J. A. & Reid, W. A. (1977). Schistosomiasis in the congenitally athymic (nude) mouse: I. Thymic dependency of eosinophilia, granuloma formation, and host morbidity. Journal of Immunology 118, 594–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, S. M., Reid, W. A., Bruce, J. I., Hedlund, K., Colvin, R. D., Campbell, R., Diggs, C. L. & Sadun, E. H. (1975). The cellular and humoral immune response to S. mansoni infections in inbred rats. I. Mechanisms during initial exposure. Cellular Immunology 19, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramalho-Pinto, F. J., de Souza, J. B. & Playfair, J. H. L. (1976). Stimulation and suppression of response of mouse T-cells to the schistosomules of Schistosoma mansoni during infection. Nature, London 259, 603–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, D. A., Fitch, F. W., Stuart, F. P., Köhler, H. & Cosenza, H. (1973). Specific suppression of immune responses. Science 181, 1133–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A. (1977). Immunity against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (Suppl.) 26, 20–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A., Smithers, S. R. & Mackenzie, P. (1975). Passive transfer of acquired resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in laboratory mice. Parasitology 70, 347–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A., Smithers, S. R., Mackenzie, P. & Broomfield, K. (1977). Schistosoma mansoni: immunoglobulins involved in passive immunization of laboratory mice. Experimental Parasitology 41, 160–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. A., Clegg, J. A., Kusel, J. R. & Webbe, G. (1976). Lung inflammation in immunity to Schistosoma mansoni. Experientia 31, 595–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1965). The infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of adult worms. Parasitology 55, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirewalt, M. A. & Uy, A. (1969). Schistosoma mansoni: cercarial penetration and schistosomule collection in an in vitro system. Experimental Parasitology 26, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tada, T. (1975). Regulation of reaginic antibody formation in animals. Progress in Allergy 19, 122–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, R. B. & Wortis, H. H. (1968). Thymus dependence of antibody response: variation with dose of antigen and class of antibody. Nature, London 220, 927–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walls, R. S., Carter, R. L., Leuchars, E. & Davies, A. J. S. (1973). The immunopathology of trichiniasis in T-cell deficient mice. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 13, 231–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Weinmann, C. J. & Hunter, G. W. (1960). Studies on schistosomiasis. XIV. Effects of cortisone upon the Schistosoma mansoni burden in mice. Experimental Parasitology 9, 239–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar