Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T00:05:05.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Egyptian fever of cattle

The transmission of Theileria annulata (Dzchunkowsky & Luhz 1904) by Hyalomma excavatum, Koch, 1844

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. Daubney  and
M. Sami Said
R. Daubney
Affiliation:
Serum and Vaccine Institute, Abbassiah, Cairo, Egypt
M. Sami Said
Affiliation:
Serum and Vaccine Institute, Abbassiah, Cairo, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The disease, Egyptian fever of cattle, has been observed at the Serum Institute, Abbassiah, in Cyrenaican and Cyprus cattle, and less frequently in native Egyptian cattle. The responsible Theileria has been determined as T. annulata (Dzchunkowsky & Luhz, 1904), and both natural and experimental transmission has been demonstrated with Hyalomma excavatum Koch 1844, of Delpy (1949b).

H. excavatum in Egypt is a three-host tick, which hibernates during the winter months in the walls of buildings in the engorged nymphal and fasting adult stages. Transmission has been effected with nymphae and adults, infected in each case by feeding the preceding stage on reacting or recovered cattle. On no occasion has infection been observed to pass through the egg to the larval stage. Infection can also be transmitted by inoculation of the blood of a reacting animal in which schizonts are demonstrable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 41 , Issue 3-4 , December 1951 , pp. 249 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, S. & Ellenbogen, V. (1935). Arch. Inst. Pasteur, Algér. 13, 541.Google Scholar
Adler, S. & Feldman-Muhsam, B. (1946). Refuah Veterinarith. 3, 91–4.Google Scholar
Adler, S. & Feldman-Muhsam, B. (1948). Parasitology, 39, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitter, H. (1905). C.R. du VIIe Congress Int. Med. Vet. 3.Google Scholar
Carpano, M. (1937). Riv. Parassitol., Roma, 1 309–23.Google Scholar
Delpy, L. P. (1946 a). Arch. Inst. Hessarek. 4, 79–107.Google Scholar
Delpy, L. P. (1946 b). Ann. Parasitol. 31, 267–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delpy, L. P. (1949 a). Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 42, 285–94.Google Scholar
Delpy, L. P. (1949 b). Ann. Parasitol. 24, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delpy, L. P. (1949 c). Ann. Parasitol. 24, 464–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delpy, L. P. (1949 d). Proc. Int. Vet. Congr. London (in the Press).Google Scholar
Doyle, T. M. (1924). J. Comp. Path. 37, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, F. E. (1922). J. Comp. Path. 35, 33–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergent, E., Donatien, A. & Lestoquard, F. (1945). Études sur les piroplasmoses bovines. Publ. Inst. Past., Algerie.Google Scholar