Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:06:12.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Action of Certain Drugs and Chemicals on Balantidium coli Malm. in Cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. Pringle Jameson
A. Pringle Jameson
Affiliation:
(From the Institute of Animal Pathology, Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In vitro work on intestinal protozoa, employing the latest culture methods, seems to approach very closely to the normal conditions in the gut of the host.

2. Balantidium coli is readily cultivated in a medium composed of an inspissated horse-serum slope covered with Ringer's solution to which egg-albumen and starch are added.

3. Tested in this medium ipecacuanha and its alkaloids emetine and cephaeline show a considerable degree of toxicity.

4. Isoemetine, methylpsychotrine and demethoxyemetine are not toxic.

5. Arsenic compounds are not very toxic, atoxyl being the most toxic of those tried and stovarsol hardly at all toxic.

6. Colloidal silver compounds are at best feebly toxic.

7. Quinine is very feebly toxic.

8. There is evidence of a distinct correspondence between B. coli and E. histolytica in their reaction to certain drugs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , April 1928 , pp. 66 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axter-Haberfeld, R. (1915). München. med. Wochenschr. 62, 152.Google Scholar
Barret, H. P. and Yarbrough, N. (1921). Amer. J. Trop. Med. 1, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrenroth, E. (1913). Arch.f. Verdauungskrankh. 19 (Erg.-H.), 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeck, W. C. and Drbohlav, J. (1925). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Washington, 2, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, (1919). München. med. Wochenschr. 66, 587.Google Scholar
Corbet, A. S. and Jameson, A. P. (1927). Biochem. J. 21, 986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, H. H. and Dobell, C. (1917). J. Pharmacol. and Exp. Therap. 10, 399.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. and Laidlaw, P. P. (1926). Parasitology, 18, 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. and Laidlaw, P. P. (1926 a). Parasitology, 18, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. and O'connor, F. W. (1921). The intestinal Protozoa of Man (London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutcher, B. H. (1915). Amer. J. Trop. Dis. and Prev. Med. 2, 663.Google Scholar
Hermitte, L. C. D., Gupta, S. C. S. and Biswas, T. N. (1926). Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop Med. and Hyg. 20, 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howitt, B. F. (1926). Univ. California Publ. Zool. 28, 173.Google Scholar
Jameson, A. P. (1927). Parasitology, 19, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmer, J. A. (1926). Principles and Practice of Chemotherapy. (Philadelphia and London.).Google Scholar
Labbé, M. (1917). Paris Méd. 27, 161.Google Scholar
Lanzenberg, A. (1918). Bull. Soc. Path. Exot. 11, 558.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, J. D. (1922). Univ. California Publ. Zool. 20, 243.Google Scholar
Reis, Van Der (1923). München. med. Wochenschr. 70, 835.Google Scholar
Ségal, J. (1926). Rev. Méd. et Hyg. Trop. 18, 176.Google Scholar
Tixier, L. (1919). Gaz. des Hôp. (Paris), 92, 1117.Google Scholar
Walker, E. L. (1913). Philippine J. Sci. (B. Trop. Med.), 8, 1.Google Scholar