Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:36:28.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phyletic gradualism in a Late Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal lineage; DSDP Site 284, southwest Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Björn A. Malmgren
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Stockholm University, Box 6801, S-113 86 Stockholm, Sweden
James P. Kennett
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, 02881

Extract

Shape measurements have been made on planktonic foraminifera from a South Pacific Late Miocene to Recent temperate evolutionary lineage (Globorotalia conoidea through intermediate forms to G. inflata in DSDP Site 284). The sampling interval is about 0.1 Myr over nearly 8 Myr. Gradual evolution (phyletic gradualism) clearly occurs in all but one measured parameter. No clear evidence exists for abrupt evolutionary steps (punctuated equilibria) within the bioseries. If they occur, they are the exception rather than the rule. The number of chambers in the final whorl decreases almost linearly, despite known paleoceanographic oscillations within the temperate water mass. Mean size and apertural shape variations seem to correlate with paleoceanographic change. It is speculated that certain major morphological changes that took place within this evolutionary bioseries (i.e. loss of keel, rounding of periphery) developed in response to a major latest Miocene cooling, associated with instability in the water column and resulting adjustments of the test structure to water density changes. Changes exhibited in shape measurements may offer a precise method of stratigraphic correlation between temperate South Pacific Late Cenozoic sequences. Four species and two subspecies, long recognized to form the basis of this lineage, are redefined biometrically.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bender, M. L. and Keigwin, L. D. Jr. 1979. Speculations about the upper Miocene change in abyssal Pacific dissolved bicarbonate δ13C. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 45:383393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, W. H. 1969. Planktonic foraminifera: basic morphology and ecologic implications. J. Paleontol. 43:13691382.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. 1977. Late Neogene planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Rio Grande Rise (South Atlantic). Mar. Micropaleontol. 2:265313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, N. A. and Reyment, R. A. 1978. Discriminant analysis of a Cretaceous foraminifer using shrunken estimators. Math. Geol. 10:347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. pp. 82115. In: Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Co.; San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology. 3:115151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. 1949. Suggestions as to quantitative measurement of rates of evolution. Evolution. 3:5156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallam, A. 1978. How rare is phyletic gradualism and what is its evolutionary significance? Evidence from Jurassic bivalves. Paleobiology. 4:1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, K. J., Cita, M. B., and Ryan, W. B. F. 1973. The origin of the Mediterranean evaporites. In: Ryan, W. B. F., K. J. Hsu, et al., eds. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 13:12031231. U.S. Gov. Printing Office; Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. G. 1967. Planktonic foraminiferal zones and new taxa from the lower Miocene to the Pleistocene of New Zealand. New Zealand J. Geol. Geophys. 10:10641078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keigwin, L. D. Jr., Bender, M. L., and Kennett, J. P. 1979. Thermal structure of the deep Pacific Ocean in the Early Pliocene. Science. 205:13861388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, G. 1978. Late Neogene biostratigraphy and paleoceanography of DSDP Site 310 Central North Pacific and correlation with the southwest Pacific. Mar. Micropaleontol. 3:97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, J. P. 1966. The Globorotalia crassaformis bioseries in north Westland and Marlborough, New Zealand. Micropaleontology. 12:235245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, J. P. 1973. Middle and Late Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the southwest Pacific—DSDP Leg 21. In: Burns, R. E., J. E. Andrews, et al., eds. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 21:575639. U.S. Gov. Printing Office; Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Kennett, J. P. 1976. Phenotypic variation in some Recent and Late Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera. pp. 111170. In: Hedley, R. H. and Adams, C. G., eds. Foraminifera. Vol. 2. Academic Press; London.Google Scholar
Kennett, J. P. 1978. The development of planktonic biogeography in the southern ocean during the Cenozoic. Mar. Micropaleontol. 3:301345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, J. P., Watkins, N. D., and Vella, P. 1971. Paleomagnetic chronology of Pliocene–early Pleistocene climates and the Plio-Pleistocene boundary in New Zealand. Science. 171:276279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennett, J. P. and Watkins, N. D. 1974. Late Miocene–early Pliocene paleomagnetic stratigraphy, paleoclimatology, and biostratigraphy in New Zealand. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 85:13851398.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, J. P. and Vella, P. 1975. Late Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera and paleoceanography at DSDP Site 284 in the cool subtropical South Pacific. In: Kennett, J. P., Houtz, R. E., et al., eds. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 24:769799. U.S. Gov. Printing Office; Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Loutit, T. S. and Kennett, J. P. 1979. Application of carbon isotope stratigraphy to Late Miocene shallow marine sediments, New Zealand. Science. 204:11961199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poore, R. Z. and Berggren, W. A. 1975. Late Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and paleoclimatology of Hatton-Rockall Basin, DSDP Site 116. J. Foram. Res. 5:270293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, W. B. F., Cita, M. B., Dreyfus Rawson, M., Burckle, L. H., and Saito, T. 1974. A paleomagnetic assignment of Neogene Stage boundaries and the development of isochronous datum planes between the Mediterranean, the Pacific and Indian Oceans in order to investigate the response of the world ocean to the Mediterranean “salinity crisis.” Rev. Ital. Paleontol. 80:631688.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H. 1973. Ontogeny and shape in Globorotalia menardii. J. Foram. Res. 3:142146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, G. H. 1979. The late Miocene to early Pliocene history of the Globorotalia miozea plexus from Blind River, New Zealand. Mar. Micropaleontol. 4:341361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, G. H. 1980. Globorotalia inflata lineage and G. crassaformis from Blind River, New Zealand: recognition, relationship, and use in latest Miocene–Early Pliocene biostratigraphy. N.Z. J. Geol. Geophys., in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, E., Killingley, J. S., and Berger, W. H. 1980. The magnetic epoch—6 carbon shift: a change in the oceans 13C/12C ratio 6.2 million years ago. Mar. Micropaleontol. 5:185203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar