Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T23:14:21.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ΠΙΣΤΙΣ in Romans 3.25: Neglected Evidence for the ‘Faithfulness of Christ’?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Bruce W. Longenecker
Affiliation:
(St John's College, Durham DH1 3RJ, England)

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Study
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Without attempting to be comprehensive, I have noted the following scholars who have favoured the ‘faith of Christ’ reading since 1982: Johnson, L. T., ‘Romans 3:21–26 and the Faith of Jesus’, CBQ 44 (1982) 7790Google Scholar; Hays, R. B., The Faith of Jesus Christ (SBLDS 56; Chico, CA: Scholars, 1983);Google ScholarChilton, B., Beginning New Testament Study (London: SPCK, 1986) 68Google Scholar; Byrne, B., Reckoning with Romans (Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1986) 7980Google Scholar; Williams, S. K., ‘Again Pistis Christou’, CBQ 49 (1987) 431–47Google Scholar; Gaston, L., Paul and the Torah (Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 1987) 103, 113, 117Google Scholar; Keck, L., ‘“Jesus” in Romans’, JBL 108 (1989) 443–60, 452–7Google Scholar; Hooker, M. D., ‘Πίστις Χριστο’, NTS 35 (1989) 321–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stowers, S., ‘Έκ πίστεως and δι⋯ τ⋯ς πίστεως in Romans 3.30’, JBL 108 (1989) 665–74Google Scholar; Davies, G. N., Faith and Obedience in Romans (JSNTS 39; Sheffield: JSOT, 1990) 107–12Google Scholar; Maccoby, H., Paul and Hellenism (London: SCM, 1991) 76Google Scholar. Most recently, see the excellent study of Campbell, D. A., The Rhetoric of Righteousness in Romans 3.21–26 (JSNTS 65; Sheffield: JSOT, 1992).Google Scholar

2 See, for instance, Hultgren, A. J., ‘The Pistis Christou Formulations in Paul’, NovT 22 (1980) 248–63Google Scholar, and the response article by Williams, ‘Pistis Christou’.

3 See, for instance, Hays, Faith, 164–7; Dunn, J. D. G., Romans 1–8 (Dallas: Word, 1988) 166–7.Google Scholar

4 Käsemann, E., Commentary on Romans (trans. Bromiley, G. W.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980) 98.Google Scholar

5 Moreover, the concept of God's covenant fidelity is mentioned later in the formula by the term δικαιοσύη, rather than πίστις (3.25b-26).

6 Cf. Gaston, Torah, 113,172.

7 Paul's charge, of course, is the product of a highly polemical argument, and has little substance outside of that arena. For Paul's argument to work, the success of Jesus requires the failure of Israel as a necessary precondition. For fuller treatment of Paul's dialogue with ‘the Jew’ of Romans 2–3, see my Eschatology and the Covenant: A Comparison of 4 Ezra and Romans 1–11 (JSNTS 57; Sheffield: JSOT, 1991) 172202.Google Scholar

8 Cf. C. F. D. Moule: in Paul's presentation, ‘Jesus Christ epitomizes Israel – indeed, is Israel’ (‘Jesus, Judaism and Paul’, Tradition and Interpretation in the New Testament [ed. G. F. Hawthorne, O. Betz; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans/Tübingen: Mohr, 1987]) 4352, 45Google Scholar. I have been influenced here expecially by the work of N. T. Wright. With reference to Paul's thought, see his The Climax of the Covenant (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1991)Google Scholar; with reference to Jesus' ministry, see his ‘Jesus, Israel and the Cross’, SBL 1985 Seminar Papers (ed. K. H. Richards; Atlanta: Scholars, 1985) 7595Google Scholar. To my knowledge, Wright has yet to advocate the reading ‘faithfulness of Christ’.